by The Cap » 03 Dec 2023 19:54
by AthleticoSpizz » 03 Dec 2023 20:21
by Snowflake Royal » 03 Dec 2023 20:26
AthleticoSpizz Thought he got it spot-on for a tournament that we will not make any significant impact in.
We lost, boo-hoo, afew run-outs for our nervous squad against cloggers and ex pro’s, the substitutions were spot-on.
Some of our players looked like they were actually enjoying playing for a change.
Just my opinion obvs, being there and all that.
by AthleticoSpizz » 03 Dec 2023 20:32
by Hound » 03 Dec 2023 20:35
Snowflake RoyalAthleticoSpizz Thought he got it spot-on for a tournament that we will not make any significant impact in.
We lost, boo-hoo, afew run-outs for our nervous squad against cloggers and ex pro’s, the substitutions were spot-on.
Some of our players looked like they were actually enjoying playing for a change.
Just my opinion obvs, being there and all that.
A competition we could have realistically earned an additional £million or so from though. And it's not like we were bossed. Better management and selection would likely have seen a win.
We lose on fine margins. The sort of fine margins good selection and coaching eradicates.
by AthleticoSpizz » 03 Dec 2023 20:38
by YorkshireRoyal99 » 03 Dec 2023 20:39
by AthleticoSpizz » 03 Dec 2023 20:48
Holmes did well, the ‘useless’ Mola got forward andYorkshireRoyal99 It's a (very) small sample admittedly, but we made minimal changes (just 1 in the first XI I believe which was enforced) between Wycombe and Carlisle and picked up back-to-back wins.
For me, Selles' biggest problem has been changing the team too much. I can understand forward areas to an extent, but we shouldn't really be changing our back 4 that much and yet we still seem to be experimenting in that area as well.
by St Pauli » 03 Dec 2023 21:52
AthleticoSpizz The “next round” lol…it could’ve been Walsall, Port Vale or anyone….as it would’ve been, Barnet or Newport….
Nice
by Royal_jimmy » 03 Dec 2023 22:07
AthleticoSpizzHolmes did well, the ‘useless’ Mola got forward andYorkshireRoyal99 It's a (very) small sample admittedly, but we made minimal changes (just 1 in the first XI I believe which was enforced) between Wycombe and Carlisle and picked up back-to-back wins.
For me, Selles' biggest problem has been changing the team too much. I can understand forward areas to an extent, but we shouldn't really be changing our back 4 that much and yet we still seem to be experimenting in that area as well.
It didn’t pay-off, but it was a bit of a free-hit today, and something worth looking at. Even Steve Coppell gave his first teamers a bit of a rest in cup games.
by Royal_jimmy » 03 Dec 2023 22:08
St PauliAthleticoSpizz The “next round” lol…it could’ve been Walsall, Port Vale or anyone….as it would’ve been, Barnet or Newport….
Nice
Would have loved Newport tbf.
Main reason I’m so po we didn’t progress.
by Snowflake Royal » 03 Dec 2023 23:42
AthleticoSpizz The “next round” lol…it could’ve been Walsall, Port Vale or anyone….as it would’ve been, Barnet or Newport….
Nice
by rabidbee » 04 Dec 2023 00:01
St PauliAthleticoSpizz The “next round” lol…it could’ve been Walsall, Port Vale or anyone….as it would’ve been, Barnet or Newport….
Nice
Would have loved Newport tbf.
Main reason I’m so po we didn’t progress.
by Hound » 04 Dec 2023 09:10
by WestYorksRoyal » 04 Dec 2023 09:19
by Sutekh » 04 Dec 2023 10:00
WestYorksRoyal Not sure if this is the thread to post it, but reports that Wilder is returning to Sheffield United. Who knows how close we were, but clearly a sinking ship in the PL is better than a sinking ship in L1.
by tidus_mi2 » 04 Dec 2023 10:17
by Royalwaster » 04 Dec 2023 10:23
Hound Think Eastleigh was the final straw for me with Selles. Haven’t been able to go or watch recent games and was interested to see if talk of the new formation etc was making us any better
We just look exactly the same. No real plan, the high pressing looks good when it comes off a couple of times a match, otherwise leaves us out of shape. Knibbs is the best at it, but some of the others can’t do it very well at all
Don’t have obvious ideas of how to create with possession. Some vague tactics towards getting it to the FBs for crossing, but then Yiadom and Dorsett (first choice FBs) aren’t good at crossing
Midfield is still a big hole half the time, though Craig helps that a bit
Wing and Smith are excellent. Azeez is a very decent player at this level who is just starting to get that final ball right. Individual moments from these three along with Knibbs just being busy seem our only route to goal. Look crap form set pieces and the left.
Defence shaky and still exposed. Still beaten physically too often. Holmes, Dean and Mola did nothing to suggest they should be in front of Abbey and Binden. Holmes passing was poor - often backwards and horrible floaty balls towards a pressing forward. Dean actually brought it out of defence quite well
And team selection was poor. Eastleigh manager clearly delighted with it. He knew full well who are dangermen were and they were on the bench
by URZZZZ » 04 Dec 2023 11:14
Snowflake RoyalAthleticoSpizz The “next round” lol…it could’ve been Walsall, Port Vale or anyone….as it would’ve been, Barnet or Newport….
Nice
Yeah, so that's £67k, plus gate receipts, plus good chance of £100k prize money and then more gate receipts.
The team was just starting to rebuild some confidence after a dreadful period. Well guess what, a poor performance against non-league opposition and a last minute defeat, on TV, after the high of a late equaliser just undid all that.
Woo, USelles got two of the most obvious subs ever right. Of course, his other three were shit. As was half his original team selection.
by Hound » 04 Dec 2023 11:38
URZZZZSnowflake RoyalAthleticoSpizz The “next round” lol…it could’ve been Walsall, Port Vale or anyone….as it would’ve been, Barnet or Newport….
Nice
Yeah, so that's £67k, plus gate receipts, plus good chance of £100k prize money and then more gate receipts.
The team was just starting to rebuild some confidence after a dreadful period. Well guess what, a poor performance against non-league opposition and a last minute defeat, on TV, after the high of a late equaliser just undid all that.
Woo, USelles got two of the most obvious subs ever right. Of course, his other three were shit. As was half his original team selection.
Think there’s too much talk of the team selection going on. Ones I’d question is Mola at CB (although he was one of the better players IMO - we do love a scapegoat here) and Elliott out left (that one made little sense)
I don’t think he’s a very good manager but the performance yesterday reflects more on the players’ than the manager. The first goal was so poor, Elliott cheaply giving the ball away and the two fullbacks marking space rather than their respective players. You can’t always legislate for that. Likewise our two CB’s going awol in the 90th minute
Users browsing this forum: Horsham Royal, Royals and Racers, windermereROYAL and 227 guests