CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

6094 posts
User avatar
tmesis
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2829
Joined: 16 Aug 2013 20:26

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by tmesis » 18 Dec 2023 11:37

Snowflake Royal When we talk about losing face, I don't think he cares about the public perception. I think he cares about his millionaire pcunt 'friends'.

What he doesn't realise is that being responsible for one of the oldest teams in world football and the biggest club to fold in the home of football for at least 40 years, is going to be a bit of a bigger deal than his other clubs when it comes to losing face.

When was the last time an English club bigger than Reading folded?

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6274
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 18 Dec 2023 11:41

tmesis
Snowflake Royal When we talk about losing face, I don't think he cares about the public perception. I think he cares about his millionaire pcunt 'friends'.

What he doesn't realise is that being responsible for one of the oldest teams in world football and the biggest club to fold in the home of football for at least 40 years, is going to be a bit of a bigger deal than his other clubs when it comes to losing face.

When was the last time an English club bigger than Reading folded?

We're not big enough to move the dial.

If Moshiri simply refused to sell Everton and let them get liquidated, parliament would magically discover the power to protect them as they did with Chelsea and Abramhovic. We wouldn't even make the back pages; we'd get a Dan Roan BBC article then a long, angry read on the Athletic and then would be forgotten about.

User avatar
From Despair To Where?
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24850
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: See me in m'pants and ting

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by From Despair To Where? » 18 Dec 2023 11:42

I guess Bristol City were of equal size in 1982. They technically folded.

User avatar
Hendo
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 21930
Joined: 25 Mar 2012 20:53
Location: Lambs to the cosmic slaughter

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Hendo » 18 Dec 2023 11:42

tmesis
Snowflake Royal When we talk about losing face, I don't think he cares about the public perception. I think he cares about his millionaire pcunt 'friends'.

What he doesn't realise is that being responsible for one of the oldest teams in world football and the biggest club to fold in the home of football for at least 40 years, is going to be a bit of a bigger deal than his other clubs when it comes to losing face.

When was the last time an English club bigger than Reading folded?


Wimbledon?

They obviously weren't bigger than us at the time and we're probably still bigger than them when we folded, but from a history point of view - they're probably bigger than us. Having played for a number of years in the top flight, which also included an FA Cup win.

Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 20253
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Stranded » 18 Dec 2023 12:11

From Despair To Where? I guess Bristol City were of equal size in 1982. They technically folded.


Middlesbrough technically folded in 1986 but rules then allowed a new company to be set up and continue the football side from the same position.


WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6274
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 18 Dec 2023 12:25

Stranded
From Despair To Where? I guess Bristol City were of equal size in 1982. They technically folded.


Middlesbrough technically folded in 1986 but rules then allowed a new company to be set up and continue the football side from the same position.

Different era. Wasn't that before promotion to the football league on pure footballing merit? These days, EFL clubs would never allow a club to re-form at this level, nor the NL.

User avatar
6ft Kerplunk
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14447
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:09
Location: Shoegazing Sheißhaus

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by 6ft Kerplunk » 18 Dec 2023 12:41

Stranded
From Despair To Where? I guess Bristol City were of equal size in 1982. They technically folded.


Middlesbrough technically folded in 1986 but rules then allowed a new company to be set up and continue the football side from the same position.

They also had to repay all debts in full not just football iirc, unlike the clubs that have gone bust and carried on since.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 42855
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 18 Dec 2023 12:57

Royalwaster
Snowflake Royal When we talk about losing face, I don't think he cares about the public perception. I think he cares about his millionaire pcunt 'friends'.

What he doesn't realise is that being responsible for one of the oldest teams in world football and the biggest club to fold in the home of football for at least 40 years, is going to be a bit of a bigger deal than his other clubs when it comes to losing face.


You're clutching at straws mate ...

I'm not sure you understand the post if you think that's clutching at straws. I've not said anything about it meaning any sort of positive outcome for us. The reverse, in fact.

User avatar
tmesis
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2829
Joined: 16 Aug 2013 20:26

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by tmesis » 18 Dec 2023 12:59

Hendo
tmesis
Snowflake Royal When we talk about losing face, I don't think he cares about the public perception. I think he cares about his millionaire pcunt 'friends'.

What he doesn't realise is that being responsible for one of the oldest teams in world football and the biggest club to fold in the home of football for at least 40 years, is going to be a bit of a bigger deal than his other clubs when it comes to losing face.

When was the last time an English club bigger than Reading folded?


Wimbledon?

They obviously weren't bigger than us at the time and we're probably still bigger than them when we folded, but from a history point of view - they're probably bigger than us. Having played for a number of years in the top flight, which also included an FA Cup win.

Wimbledon were a poorly supported club who had a few years in the sun. Their top flight crowds were a joke until they moved and could give away teams up to 20,000 seats.

They weren't bigger than Reading, just more successful.

Regarding clubs that just started a new company and carried on, like Bristol City, I don't think they count.


User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 42855
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 18 Dec 2023 13:10

Hendo
tmesis
Snowflake Royal When we talk about losing face, I don't think he cares about the public perception. I think he cares about his millionaire pcunt 'friends'.

What he doesn't realise is that being responsible for one of the oldest teams in world football and the biggest club to fold in the home of football for at least 40 years, is going to be a bit of a bigger deal than his other clubs when it comes to losing face.

When was the last time an English club bigger than Reading folded?


Wimbledon?

They obviously weren't bigger than us at the time and we're probably still bigger than them when we folded, but from a history point of view - they're probably bigger than us. Having played for a number of years in the top flight, which also included an FA Cup win.

They had a major trophy win and more time in the top flight but they had lower support (10k in 93/94 in the PL) and much less time in the league than us - they didn’t get out of Non League until the late 70s.

I'd say they were smaller, but had bigger achievements. But a case could be argued, its fairly close.

They're also blurred by being moved and rebranded rather than ceasing to exist. And neither Middlesbrough or, I presume, Brizzle ceased to exist.

Elm Park Kid
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2099
Joined: 05 Feb 2013 10:45

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Elm Park Kid » 18 Dec 2023 14:02

From what i've heard, Dai has just completely disengaged. He doesn't follow what's going on at the club at all and isn't taking any of the takeover stuff seriously.

User avatar
SouthDownsRoyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11315
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 12:48

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by SouthDownsRoyal » 18 Dec 2023 14:20

Elm Park Kid From what i've heard, Dai has just completely disengaged. He doesn't follow what's going on at the club at all and isn't taking any of the takeover stuff seriously.


Sounds about right

It’s like he’s just got bored, but why not sell up and go away with a few quid

blythspartan
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2416
Joined: 05 Jun 2012 20:50

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by blythspartan » 18 Dec 2023 14:35

SouthDownsRoyal
Elm Park Kid From what i've heard, Dai has just completely disengaged. He doesn't follow what's going on at the club at all and isn't taking any of the takeover stuff seriously.


Sounds about right

It’s like he’s just got bored, but why not sell up and go away with a few quid


I agree, maybe sell us to Ashley for a half a million or something.

If he really has no further interest in the club it’ll just end in liquidation and there’s nothing anyone can do about it. It’s very sad that 152/3 years of history will be gone. I just wish there was a way to force him to sell.


WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6274
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 18 Dec 2023 14:49

Elm Park Kid From what i've heard, Dai has just completely disengaged. He doesn't follow what's going on at the club at all and isn't taking any of the takeover stuff seriously.

Pretty contradictory with other reports. First, we know he paid HMRC last month. Why do that if you don't care? And now the rumour is he has moved the goalposts on the sale. That's not the actions of someone disinterested. If someone offers you £30m for something you don't care about, you just accept and get out.

We're all speculating, but my guess he increased the price because of a couple of good results but also he's a compulsive gambler who enjoys the games. That doesn't mean he's lost interest in selling.

Clyde1998
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2821
Joined: 04 Mar 2010 16:27

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Clyde1998 » 18 Dec 2023 17:18

WestYorksRoyal
Elm Park Kid From what i've heard, Dai has just completely disengaged. He doesn't follow what's going on at the club at all and isn't taking any of the takeover stuff seriously.

Pretty contradictory with other reports. First, we know he paid HMRC last month. Why do that if you don't care? And now the rumour is he has moved the goalposts on the sale. That's not the actions of someone disinterested. If someone offers you £30m for something you don't care about, you just accept and get out.

We're all speculating, but my guess he increased the price because of a couple of good results but also he's a compulsive gambler who enjoys the games. That doesn't mean he's lost interest in selling.

It might also be because there are multiple interested parties he feels he's able to start a bidding war for the club.

Elm Park Kid
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2099
Joined: 05 Feb 2013 10:45

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Elm Park Kid » 18 Dec 2023 17:19

WestYorksRoyal
Elm Park Kid From what i've heard, Dai has just completely disengaged. He doesn't follow what's going on at the club at all and isn't taking any of the takeover stuff seriously.

Pretty contradictory with other reports. First, we know he paid HMRC last month. Why do that if you don't care? And now the rumour is he has moved the goalposts on the sale. That's not the actions of someone disinterested. If someone offers you £30m for something you don't care about, you just accept and get out.

We're all speculating, but my guess he increased the price because of a couple of good results but also he's a compulsive gambler who enjoys the games. That doesn't mean he's lost interest in selling.


Imagine someone who bought a holiday home and made a big fuss about it to their mates. But the house turns out to be a money pit and the area becomes unpopular. They have no interest in going anymore, but also loathed to sell for an 'embarrassing' amount. So, they put it on the market, but rebuff every 'sensible' offer, sending over the absolute minimum amount of money to keep it going each month. They don't give a shit about the house, but don't want to have to publicly admit the amount of money they lost.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 42855
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 18 Dec 2023 17:24

Elm Park Kid
WestYorksRoyal
Elm Park Kid From what i've heard, Dai has just completely disengaged. He doesn't follow what's going on at the club at all and isn't taking any of the takeover stuff seriously.

Pretty contradictory with other reports. First, we know he paid HMRC last month. Why do that if you don't care? And now the rumour is he has moved the goalposts on the sale. That's not the actions of someone disinterested. If someone offers you £30m for something you don't care about, you just accept and get out.

We're all speculating, but my guess he increased the price because of a couple of good results but also he's a compulsive gambler who enjoys the games. That doesn't mean he's lost interest in selling.


Imagine someone who bought a holiday home and made a big fuss about it to their mates. But the house turns out to be a money pit and the area becomes unpopular. They have no interest in going anymore, but also loathed to sell for an 'embarrassing' amount. So, they put it on the market, but rebuff every 'sensible' offer, sending over the absolute minimum amount of money to keep it going each month. They don't give a shit about the house, but don't want to have to publicly admit the amount of money they lost.

Doesn't really fit. And we're not talking just the odd quid for standing charges for gas, electricty and water. We're talking about salaries and tax for upwards of a couple hundred people.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6274
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 18 Dec 2023 17:24

Elm Park Kid
WestYorksRoyal
Elm Park Kid From what i've heard, Dai has just completely disengaged. He doesn't follow what's going on at the club at all and isn't taking any of the takeover stuff seriously.

Pretty contradictory with other reports. First, we know he paid HMRC last month. Why do that if you don't care? And now the rumour is he has moved the goalposts on the sale. That's not the actions of someone disinterested. If someone offers you £30m for something you don't care about, you just accept and get out.

We're all speculating, but my guess he increased the price because of a couple of good results but also he's a compulsive gambler who enjoys the games. That doesn't mean he's lost interest in selling.


Imagine someone who bought a holiday home and made a big fuss about it to their mates. But the house turns out to be a money pit and the area becomes unpopular. They have no interest in going anymore, but also loathed to sell for an 'embarrassing' amount. So, they put it on the market, but rebuff every 'sensible' offer, sending over the absolute minimum amount of money to keep it going each month. They don't give a shit about the house, but don't want to have to publicly admit the amount of money they lost.

Doesn't want to admit publicly to what he's lost? We can all see that he's already lost over £200m on his failed gamble; it's reported everywhere!

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20303
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Undiscovered pyramid somewhere in Egypt

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Sutekh » 18 Dec 2023 18:17

tmesis
Snowflake Royal When we talk about losing face, I don't think he cares about the public perception. I think he cares about his millionaire pcunt 'friends'.

What he doesn't realise is that being responsible for one of the oldest teams in world football and the biggest club to fold in the home of football for at least 40 years, is going to be a bit of a bigger deal than his other clubs when it comes to losing face.

When was the last time an English club bigger than Reading folded?


Bury.

Bury spent more years in the top diviosion, Bury soent more season in the second division. Bury won the FA Cup.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6274
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 18 Dec 2023 18:20

Sutekh
tmesis
Snowflake Royal When we talk about losing face, I don't think he cares about the public perception. I think he cares about his millionaire pcunt 'friends'.

What he doesn't realise is that being responsible for one of the oldest teams in world football and the biggest club to fold in the home of football for at least 40 years, is going to be a bit of a bigger deal than his other clubs when it comes to losing face.

When was the last time an English club bigger than Reading folded?


Bury.

Bury spent more years in the top diviosion, Bury soent more season in the second division. Bury won the FA Cup.

Is this a joke? 12k ground normally half full, not in the top flight since before the 2nd World War. Like those people who claim Preston are a massive club because of those 1800s titles.

6094 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ankeny, Fox Talbot, Google Adsense [Bot] and 283 guests

It is currently 01 Dec 2024 09:30