by blythspartan » 03 Jan 2024 12:45
by Brogue » 03 Jan 2024 13:36
by YorkshireRoyal99 » 03 Jan 2024 17:00
Brogue there is no way utd would have put a first-refusal clause in the deal if they didn't think he's going to go on to be a good player in the future. we should defo keep hold
by Snowflake Royal » 03 Jan 2024 17:25
Hendohughsies no.1 So much hype around this signing, but lets be honest - he has underwhelmed and hasn't earned a starting spot and since he has lost his starting spot we have seen our recent upturn in form.
Sideways and backwards passing, Elliot is streets ahead of him currently and he can't get in the team either.
Obviously a signing for the future, but wouldn't be a disaster if he went by any means imho.
Other than for the winner on Monday though...
It was his forward pass into space for Dorsett which started the move.
by Stranded » 04 Jan 2024 10:13
by John Smith » 04 Jan 2024 11:23
YorkshireRoyal99Brogue there is no way utd would have put a first-refusal clause in the deal if they didn't think he's going to go on to be a good player in the future. we should defo keep hold
Man United have hardly built a reputation for good decision making in the last decade however.
by Brogue » 04 Jan 2024 11:25
John SmithYorkshireRoyal99Brogue there is no way utd would have put a first-refusal clause in the deal if they didn't think he's going to go on to be a good player in the future. we should defo keep hold
Man United have hardly built a reputation for good decision making in the last decade however.
Can I just clarify here that both of you are suggesting Charlie Savage might be good enough to play for Man United one day?
by From Despair To Where? » 04 Jan 2024 11:29
Stranded Given the views aired today by Sam Smith - it will be interesting* to see if some players feel they have been sold a dud push for a move away. Savage's dad could well be one of those esp if not playing.
by YorkshireRoyal99 » 04 Jan 2024 11:30
John SmithYorkshireRoyal99Brogue there is no way utd would have put a first-refusal clause in the deal if they didn't think he's going to go on to be a good player in the future. we should defo keep hold
Man United have hardly built a reputation for good decision making in the last decade however.
Can I just clarify here that both of you are suggesting Charlie Savage might be good enough to play for Man United one day?
by Hound » 04 Jan 2024 11:39
John SmithYorkshireRoyal99Brogue there is no way utd would have put a first-refusal clause in the deal if they didn't think he's going to go on to be a good player in the future. we should defo keep hold
Man United have hardly built a reputation for good decision making in the last decade however.
Can I just clarify here that both of you are suggesting Charlie Savage might be good enough to play for Man United one day?
by MartinRdg » 04 Jan 2024 13:09
HoundJohn SmithYorkshireRoyal99
Man United have hardly built a reputation for good decision making in the last decade however.
Can I just clarify here that both of you are suggesting Charlie Savage might be good enough to play for Man United one day?
The way they are going he might just be
by SouthDownsRoyal » 04 Jan 2024 22:37
by Hound » 05 Jan 2024 08:46
SouthDownsRoyal He will leave, why would he stay?
by Stranded » 05 Jan 2024 09:45
HoundSouthDownsRoyal He will leave, why would he stay?
Because he’s under contract?
by Mr Angry » 05 Jan 2024 10:22
by morganb » 05 Jan 2024 15:07
by Sutekh » 05 Jan 2024 16:29
by SouthDownsRoyal » 05 Jan 2024 20:43
HoundSouthDownsRoyal He will leave, why would he stay?
Because he’s under contract?
by Hound » 05 Jan 2024 20:55
SouthDownsRoyalHoundSouthDownsRoyal He will leave, why would he stay?
Because he’s under contract?
Ah true, no way he will leave then.
by Clyde1998 » 05 Jan 2024 21:05
morganb Stockport and an unnamed Championship club have joined the race for Charlie Savage. Reading have told them he’s not for sale.
https://twitter.com/RFCLatest/status/17 ... 5130031208 and Daily Star
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests