by Fezza » 14 Jan 2024 12:09
by Royal Monkey » 14 Jan 2024 12:10
NathStPaulSt PauliLower West What's it actually achieved ?
Dai is the legal owner of the club. Mob rule isn't going to over rule the status quo. No oe is going to invest in any football c;lub with that concern in the backs of their minds. Sense of self entitlement is overpowering. Clubs rise and fall. That's the nature of sport in general.
F/ck off lower west.
Take your Daily Telegraph interpretation of history with you…
His name suggests he is a West Stand mong who takes his own sandwiches to games along with a tartan patterned blanket to pit over his legs.
by Clyde1998 » 14 Jan 2024 12:10
St PauliClyde1998Brogue
So far it seems most fans were in favour
I wonder what it would've been prior to this week's events. We've gone from the tennis balls being supported by a sizeable minority to getting games abandoned being in the majority very quickly.
The people are becoming more radicalised!
It won’t be long until we have a sizeable majority supporting an armed terror campaign against Dai and the EFL.
I’m happy to stockpile weapons and rockets in my school for SBWD. Just hit me up over PM.
by Orion1871 » 14 Jan 2024 12:11
paddy20 The last thing Chinese owners want is to lose face. The publicity now I hope will be embaressing for Dai. I see the Chinese have now bought our famous prison as well
by Orion1871 » 14 Jan 2024 12:14
Royal MonkeyNathStPaulSt Pauli
F/ck off lower west.
Take your Daily Telegraph interpretation of history with you…
His name suggests he is a West Stand mong who takes his own sandwiches to games along with a tartan patterned blanket to pit over his legs.
Well your be glad to know one of those West Stand mongs as you so eloquently put it, my 82 year old dad, a real life long fan ST holder since 1970 won’t be returning after yesterday. He had 2 heart attacks in the last couple of years has 2 stents and still walks over a mile to the ground. On top of seeing no football ( he supports the protests just thinks should of got off in time for game to continue) and havin kids shout abuse in his direction that he should be invading the pitch has been the last straw.
Sure this will make many happy cos who wants old West Stand mongs who actually supported the club for over 60 years as fans eh!!!
by Snowflake Royal » 14 Jan 2024 12:18
Ten BobsworthSnowflake Royal I think it's a case that most people who argue against the action still respectvthe feelung behind it and support the right to do it.
And you can argue whether it's constructive or the best action as much as you like before it happens to try to influence against it, but once it's happened that's done and its time to send a united front.
I was against tennis ball disruptions during the game, I'd prefer a different protest or timing that doesn't interrupt play. But it did it's job and was mostly well handled, which is worth applauding those who did it.
Same for the pitch invasion. I think it's more harmful than helpful, and now was the wrong time. I didn’t think it should happen. But it has, so now we get behind it.
Get behind it with another futile gesture. That'll show 'em what you're made of.
Why not try to become preferred bidder like BWFCST did. They raised £50K.
by Millsy » 14 Jan 2024 12:21
by St Pauli » 14 Jan 2024 12:23
Royal MonkeyNathStPaulSt Pauli
F/ck off lower west.
Take your Daily Telegraph interpretation of history with you…
His name suggests he is a West Stand mong who takes his own sandwiches to games along with a tartan patterned blanket to pit over his legs.
Well your be glad to know one of those West Stand mongs as you so eloquently put it, my 82 year old dad, a real life long fan ST holder since 1970 won’t be returning after yesterday. He had 2 heart attacks in the last couple of years has 2 stents and still walks over a mile to the ground. On top of seeing no football ( he supports the protests just thinks should of got off in time for game to continue) and havin kids shout abuse in his direction that he should be invading the pitch has been the last straw.
Sure this will make many happy cos who wants old West Stand mongs who actually supported the club for over 60 years as fans eh!!!
by NathStPaul » 14 Jan 2024 12:23
Millsy I think it was too disruptive invading the whole pitch like that.
We should have invaded only one half.
by Royal Monkey » 14 Jan 2024 12:28
Mr Angry Personally, whilst I support fans protesting in whichever way they feel they need to, I don't agree with what happened today.
What was the aim? If it was to make Dai sell up, then has that happened? Will it happen because of today? I suggest the answer is no.
What is far more likely is that the club will be punished, and if that punishment makes it more likely that we get relegated and so less attractive for someone to buy as a result, then I would argue today was counter-productive.
I want Dai Yonnge gone the same as everyone; I'm just not sure today's events were the best way of trying to achieve that goal.
Just my opinion.
by morganb » 14 Jan 2024 12:32
by shadesrwrf » 14 Jan 2024 12:38
Lower WestshadesrwrfLower West What's it actually achieved ?
Dai is the legal owner of the club. Mob rule isn't going to over rule the status quo. No oe is going to invest in any football c;lub with that concern in the backs of their minds. Sense of self entitlement is overpowering. Clubs rise and fall. That's the nature of sport in general.
You don't think anyone will buy a club that has a set of fans who are passionate and committed? I'd have thought the right person would be more than happy to have that kind of support.
Fans who will turn on them, the operational management, the team manager, the director of football when times get tough. Drift away as the club falls down the league standings. As they'd prefer to spend their hard earned money on other things.
by shadesrwrf » 14 Jan 2024 12:41
72 busLower Westshadesrwrf
Well said.
Precisely why protests are meaningless. Playground antics. Don't get my way I'll spit my dummy out and call other people names. Pathetic.
Hopefully those that have incurred the club a fine (and possibly additional costs if the fixture is rescheduled) will put their hands in their pockets. Or the club wil be looking to shave more headcount off the payroll to recoup the lost money.
Most of those on the pitch today are still getting pocket money from their parents and a lot of them won't be turning up when we are in league two.
Sat next to an old boy in the upper west who has been supporting since 1965 and he said "it doesn't matter what league we end up in as long as I can get away from the missus for a few hours and watch my football I'm happy. Sad for him today as well as the Port Vale lads who came down.
by biff » 14 Jan 2024 12:48
by Winston Biscuit » 14 Jan 2024 12:49
by shadesrwrf » 14 Jan 2024 12:50
by OLLIE KEARNS » 14 Jan 2024 12:54
Fezza I understand the frustration but feel that pushing the abandonment was against the best interests of the team (given how they've regained form). We now risk (at worst) a points deduction, fine and being behind closed doors or (at best) playing the fixture again but at a time when Dai has sold off the better players. I’m not certain how any of this moves us closer to a sale / administration, albeit invading the pitch must have been cathartic.
We are all though stuck waiting, with minimal communication from the parties who can make a difference.
by PieEater » 14 Jan 2024 12:58
by biff » 14 Jan 2024 13:03
by Winston Biscuit » 14 Jan 2024 13:04
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Horsham Royal and 190 guests