Depends on size, probably cheaper for a statue of someone very short.windermereROYAL It`s over £84k now, how much does a statue cost for goodness sake?
by Forbury Lion » 16 Jan 2024 10:02
Depends on size, probably cheaper for a statue of someone very short.windermereROYAL It`s over £84k now, how much does a statue cost for goodness sake?
by OLLIE KEARNS » 16 Jan 2024 10:08
windermereROYAL People pushing for more pitch invasions, not sure what traction it will get, but for me Saturday sent out a big message and achieved it`s goals, any more will be counter productive and do more damage than good.
It will almost certainly stop fans coming if they`re uncertain of seeing a full game.
by blythspartan » 16 Jan 2024 10:12
by WestYorksRoyal » 16 Jan 2024 10:13
by RG30 » 16 Jan 2024 10:14
by Stranded » 16 Jan 2024 10:15
WestYorksRoyal Daylong Pang agreeing to go on TalkSport at 10.30. Did not expect that![]()
After lambasting Jordan yesterday, I hope he is at his antagonistic worst. Paul from EPR knew what to expect and handled it well; I'd be surprised if Pang has a clue.
by windermereROYAL » 16 Jan 2024 10:19
NathStPaulwindermereROYAL People pushing for more pitch invasions, not sure what traction it will get, but for me Saturday sent out a big message and achieved it`s goals, any more will be counter productive and do more damage than good.
It will almost certainly stop fans coming if they`re uncertain of seeing a full game.
Which people? Provide evidence please.
by NathStPaul » 16 Jan 2024 10:21
windermereROYALNathStPaulwindermereROYAL People pushing for more pitch invasions, not sure what traction it will get, but for me Saturday sent out a big message and achieved it`s goals, any more will be counter productive and do more damage than good.
It will almost certainly stop fans coming if they`re uncertain of seeing a full game.
Which people? Provide evidence please.
Micah, Hugo, Guilty, I support Reading, all on X
by WestYorksRoyal » 16 Jan 2024 10:25
blythspartan The Reading FC twitter feed has gone eerily quiet. I dread the day they announce liquidation.
by biff » 16 Jan 2024 10:28
windermereROYALNathStPaulwindermereROYAL People pushing for more pitch invasions, not sure what traction it will get, but for me Saturday sent out a big message and achieved it`s goals, any more will be counter productive and do more damage than good.
It will almost certainly stop fans coming if they`re uncertain of seeing a full game.
Which people? Provide evidence please.
Micah, Hugo, Guilty, I support Reading, all on X
by Winston Biscuit » 16 Jan 2024 10:42
by RoyalBlue » 16 Jan 2024 10:45
Winston Biscuit SBWD stood firmly against the in game pitch invasion on Saturday I think. Have they said whether they would support another one?
by RoyalBlue » 16 Jan 2024 10:50
OLLIE KEARNSwindermereROYAL People pushing for more pitch invasions, not sure what traction it will get, but for me Saturday sent out a big message and achieved it`s goals, any more will be counter productive and do more damage than good.
It will almost certainly stop fans coming if they`re uncertain of seeing a full game.
My best guess would be that it firstly ensures relegation as a result of lost revenue and further sanctions such as points deductions for not paying wages. Secondly, the EFL may disqualify him from ownership thus requiring a new source of funds just to fund the club on a daily basis. .
by Sutekh » 16 Jan 2024 10:50
RoyalBlueWinston Biscuit SBWD stood firmly against the in game pitch invasion on Saturday I think. Have they said whether they would support another one?
They suggested invading and occupying the pitch at the end of the game (support team throughout) on Saturday. I believe some of them are now suggesting the protests should move to London.
by Winston Biscuit » 16 Jan 2024 10:51
SutekhRoyalBlueWinston Biscuit SBWD stood firmly against the in game pitch invasion on Saturday I think. Have they said whether they would support another one?
They suggested invading and occupying the pitch at the end of the game (support team throughout) on Saturday. I believe some of them are now suggesting the protests should move to London.
Demos and sit-ins outside the Chinese embassy?
by NathStPaul » 16 Jan 2024 10:51
by Greatwesternline » 16 Jan 2024 10:58
RG30 Sounded like it’s been pre-recorded already and not live sadly.
by OLLIE KEARNS » 16 Jan 2024 10:59
RoyalBlueOLLIE KEARNSwindermereROYAL People pushing for more pitch invasions, not sure what traction it will get, but for me Saturday sent out a big message and achieved it`s goals, any more will be counter productive and do more damage than good.
It will almost certainly stop fans coming if they`re uncertain of seeing a full game.
My best guess would be that it firstly ensures relegation as a result of lost revenue and further sanctions such as points deductions for not paying wages. Secondly, the EFL may disqualify him from ownership thus requiring a new source of funds just to fund the club on a daily basis. .
One independent 'expert' on Twitter (he seems to know what he is talking about and has produced a lot of info about Dodgy Dai's dealings/troubles in China) said that they can only bar him from being a director. He will remain as majority shareholder as long as he chooses.
by Brogue » 16 Jan 2024 11:01
by Greatwesternline » 16 Jan 2024 11:02
RoyalBlueOLLIE KEARNSwindermereROYAL People pushing for more pitch invasions, not sure what traction it will get, but for me Saturday sent out a big message and achieved it`s goals, any more will be counter productive and do more damage than good.
It will almost certainly stop fans coming if they`re uncertain of seeing a full game.
My best guess would be that it firstly ensures relegation as a result of lost revenue and further sanctions such as points deductions for not paying wages. Secondly, the EFL may disqualify him from ownership thus requiring a new source of funds just to fund the club on a daily basis. .
One independent 'expert' on Twitter (he seems to know what he is talking about and has produced a lot of info about Dodgy Dai's dealings/troubles in China) said that they can only bar him from being a director. He will remain as majority shareholder as long as he chooses.
Users browsing this forum: donh99, Google Adsense [Bot], SouthDownsRoyal and 186 guests