by traff » 18 Jan 2024 11:42
by Sutekh » 18 Jan 2024 12:50
traff More evidence that the pitch invasion was not in vain.
Great to see solidarity from the football family. Even if the bullet they dodged hit us!
https://hullcitysupporterstrust.com/hcs ... ding-fans/
by Snowflake Royal » 18 Jan 2024 12:52
GreatwesternlineWho Moved The Goalposts?YorkshireRoyal99
I don't see how they can, otherwise surely they'd have stepped in long before now to ensure that staff, HMRC etc are paid on time. I think the best they can do is what they've done previously, order Dai to pay a percentage into a designated account by a certain date.
I think the EFL may have dropped the ball somewhat, as IIRC, the EFL made regular financial reporting a condition of Dai being allowed to take over. If they haven't been doing that, they likely won't be monitoring transfer transactions either.
What makes you think they havent been receiving regular financial reporting?
by Greatwesternline » 18 Jan 2024 12:57
Snowflake RoyalGreatwesternlineWho Moved The Goalposts?
I think the EFL may have dropped the ball somewhat, as IIRC, the EFL made regular financial reporting a condition of Dai being allowed to take over. If they haven't been doing that, they likely won't be monitoring transfer transactions either.
What makes you think they havent been receiving regular financial reporting?
Them easing restrictions on more than one occasion springs to mind.
by WestYorksRoyal » 18 Jan 2024 13:04
GreatwesternlineSnowflake RoyalGreatwesternline
What makes you think they havent been receiving regular financial reporting?
Them easing restrictions on more than one occasion springs to mind.
The restrictions ebbed and flowed in line with our misconduct > enforcement > relaxation of sanctions > new misconduct > enforcement.
We were transparent with everything we did, and when we did stuff wrong they punished us. After being punished we got a new life. We then broke the rules again. There is no great conspiracy here.
by Winston Biscuit » 18 Jan 2024 13:25
by NathStPaul » 18 Jan 2024 13:30
Winston Biscuit IMO this 16th minute clap thing being asked of other clubs fans is nonsense, cringey as anything, and is more likely to turn other sets of fans against us than support us
Just IMO though
by Brogue » 18 Jan 2024 13:33
by Hendo » 18 Jan 2024 13:42
NathStPaulWinston Biscuit IMO this 16th minute clap thing being asked of other clubs fans is nonsense, cringey as anything, and is more likely to turn other sets of fans against us than support us
Just IMO though
Absolutely this, it is completely counterproductive. To be fair to SBWD I don't think they pushed for this or encouraged it, it was Port Vale trying to be nice.
by NathStPaul » 18 Jan 2024 13:46
by Winston Biscuit » 18 Jan 2024 13:47
by Brogue » 18 Jan 2024 13:49
Winston Biscuit A quick look at X, formally known as twitter, shows a handful of fan groups promoting this 16th minute clap, and the responses from their own fans are almost universally laughter, stating they will obviously not do it, and then conversations starting up about things we have done in the past etc as to why they would not support a club like ours
I have no idea who's idea this was but its massively misguided and shows a total lack of awareness and understanding IMO.
by Brogue » 18 Jan 2024 14:02
Greatwesternline WRTOP, I've seen this tweet from SBWD: https://x.com/SellBeforeWeDai/status/17 ... 92091?s=20
What legal advice do we think SBWD need to procure, and is it fair for them to be fleecing gullible Reading fans into donating their hard earned so that a few self selected fans can pay a lawyer to tell them about the basics of insolvency law?
by blythspartan » 18 Jan 2024 14:12
BrogueGreatwesternline WRTOP, I've seen this tweet from SBWD: https://x.com/SellBeforeWeDai/status/17 ... 92091?s=20
What legal advice do we think SBWD need to procure, and is it fair for them to be fleecing gullible Reading fans into donating their hard earned so that a few self selected fans can pay a lawyer to tell them about the basics of insolvency law?
now at 8k
by blythspartan » 18 Jan 2024 15:03
by NathStPaul » 18 Jan 2024 15:31
by WestYorksRoyal » 18 Jan 2024 15:37
NathStPaul That complete charlatan Alex Crook reporting that Sam Smith could be off very soon.
by blythspartan » 18 Jan 2024 15:43
WestYorksRoyalNathStPaul That complete charlatan Alex Crook reporting that Sam Smith could be off very soon.
Not familiar with his reporting record. Anyhow, will give a good indication of how serious Dai is about selling the club.
How much more can you get selling a L1 club over a L2 club? That's how much Sam Smith is worth to him. Sell him for peanuts and it's a sign that once again statements are lip service only.
by WestYorksRoyal » 18 Jan 2024 15:47
blythspartanWestYorksRoyalNathStPaul That complete charlatan Alex Crook reporting that Sam Smith could be off very soon.
Not familiar with his reporting record. Anyhow, will give a good indication of how serious Dai is about selling the club.
How much more can you get selling a L1 club over a L2 club? That's how much Sam Smith is worth to him. Sell him for peanuts and it's a sign that once again statements are lip service only.
If he goes the writings on the wall.
by tmesis » 18 Jan 2024 15:50
Winston Biscuit A quick look at X, formally known as twitter, shows a handful of fan groups promoting this 16th minute clap, and the responses from their own fans are almost universally laughter, stating they will obviously not do it, and then conversations starting up about things we have done in the past etc as to why they would not support a club like ours
I have no idea who's idea this was but its massively misguided and shows a total lack of awareness and understanding IMO.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 210 guests