CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

6094 posts
User avatar
Brogue
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13593
Joined: 02 Mar 2021 20:38
Location: Getting things done

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Brogue » 26 Jan 2024 08:45

Sutekh PS - shouldn't this thread be sticky too?


Agreed

Forbury Lion *

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25280
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Hound » 26 Jan 2024 09:41

Interesting interview

Does make you wonder what the hell Smudger Smith was going on about. Clearly absolute nonsense fed to him there

Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 20253
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Stranded » 26 Jan 2024 09:47

Hound Interesting interview

Does make you wonder what the hell Smudger Smith was going on about. Clearly absolute nonsense fed to him there


Yes, the interview does make that "leak" even more damaging for him and his follow up about things changing already seem even more bizarre. Of course, Howe, could be painting a very specific picture but IF TRUE, does appear that we are still a good couple of weeks away from a decision being made on which opportunity (as Howe put it) the club/owner will move forward with.

User avatar
Winston Biscuit
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 36521
Joined: 05 May 2017 07:32
Location: PUSSY IN BIO

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Winston Biscuit » 26 Jan 2024 09:59

took that Dellor/Howe interview to be all pretty much positive news!

Dai is now finally serious about selling, the club hope to present to him the best bid in a couple of weeks time, and if he accepts it the the sale will go through 2 months or so after

Clyde1998
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2821
Joined: 04 Mar 2010 16:27

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Clyde1998 » 26 Jan 2024 10:03

Winston Biscuit took that Dellor/Howe interview to be all pretty much positive news!

Dai is now finally serious about selling, the club hope to present to him the best bid in a couple of weeks time, and if he accepts it the the sale will go through 2 months or so after

I'm guessing anyone who's waiting for approval from the EFL would be able to loan the club money to cover costs prior to officially taking over - similar to how SCL have been lending money to pay wages. That will hopefully mean we're not going to have issue paying wages/HMRC in that period.


WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6274
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 26 Jan 2024 10:04

Stranded
Hound Interesting interview

Does make you wonder what the hell Smudger Smith was going on about. Clearly absolute nonsense fed to him there


Yes, the interview does make that "leak" even more damaging for him and his follow up about things changing already seem even more bizarre. Of course, Howe, could be painting a very specific picture but IF TRUE, does appear that we are still a good couple of weeks away from a decision being made on which opportunity (as Howe put it) the club/owner will move forward with.

It was a politicians interview. Not lying, but also being diplomatic. Certainly relatively complimentary of Dai which will be a stick for conspiracy theorists to beat him with, but what do you expect him to say when the survival of the club depends on dealing with him?

But I'm rightfully skeptical when people say Dai is committed to selling. Last May he was committed to funding the club, this autumn he was going to sell. He's unreliable and clearly has limited communication with people working for him.

I always hang onto hope, but this hell only ends when everything is confirmed.

User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11779
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by RoyalBlue » 26 Jan 2024 10:37

Sutekh Tim has his show at 6pm tonight so hopefully might be a bit more.

Timescales pretty much as I was expecting, should be plenty of time to check through all 8 interested parties, and any bids, to ensure whatever buyers/bids are put on the final table is as kocher as they can be. Good that Dai SEEMS to want to sell everything which will hopefully mean the club and stadium can be put back together again. Let's hope he doesn't change things halfway through.

PS - shouldn't this thread be sticky too?


The one fly in the ointment is that, if I heard Howe correctly, the car park isn't currently part of the package as Dai only partly owns that.

windermereROYAL
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8376
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 11:18

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by windermereROYAL » 26 Jan 2024 10:42

I was of the understanding that the Thais own the car park for the royal elm park development whenever that comes to fruition.

User avatar
Armadillo Roadkill
Member
Posts: 911
Joined: 03 Nov 2007 19:47
Location: In a zone of great calm

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Armadillo Roadkill » 26 Jan 2024 11:12

windermereROYAL I was of the understanding that the Thais own the car park for the royal elm park development whenever that comes to fruition.


I think that's right from what was in the Chronicle. Saw some plans for "Royal Elm Park" which covers all of the current car park. There is a multi-story car park included in the development that will be used on match days. The residents will love that.


Forbury Lion
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 9169
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: https://youtu.be/c4sX57ZUhzc

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Forbury Lion » 26 Jan 2024 11:15

Can owner of the Club, Training Ground and Stadium bring them all under the Club again?

FFP implications might prevent this, since the clubs accounts showed a profit on the sale of these. The issue the EFL had was that these were not show at a fair value rate, so if the club buys them back for £1 each the FFP rules/EFL might insist the club records this at Fair Value again, otherwise clubs will just keep selling and buying back their stadium.

Suspect they may have to create an umbrella company with the 3 separate companies underneath that.

Forbury Lion
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 9169
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: https://youtu.be/c4sX57ZUhzc

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Forbury Lion » 26 Jan 2024 11:17

Armadillo Roadkill
windermereROYAL I was of the understanding that the Thais own the car park for the royal elm park development whenever that comes to fruition.


I think that's right from what was in the Chronicle. Saw some plans for "Royal Elm Park" which covers all of the current car park. There is a multi-story car park included in the development that will be used on match days. The residents will love that.
Let's hope the residents are 100% aware that they are buying a property next to a football ground and what comes with that.

It's a bit like people buying a house next to Heathrow and complaining about the Planes, that's why the house was cheap. :roll:

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6274
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 26 Jan 2024 11:21

Forbury Lion
Armadillo Roadkill
windermereROYAL I was of the understanding that the Thais own the car park for the royal elm park development whenever that comes to fruition.


I think that's right from what was in the Chronicle. Saw some plans for "Royal Elm Park" which covers all of the current car park. There is a multi-story car park included in the development that will be used on match days. The residents will love that.
Let's hope the residents are 100% aware that they are buying a property next to a football ground and what comes with that.

It's a bit like people buying a house next to Heathrow and complaining about the Planes, that's why the house was cheap. :roll:

Would the development just be residential? I'd love to see more food and pubs near the ground.

User avatar
rabidbee
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3664
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 17:51
Location: Like a dog to vomit

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by rabidbee » 26 Jan 2024 11:28

Forbury Lion Can owner of the Club, Training Ground and Stadium bring them all under the Club again?

FFP implications might prevent this, since the clubs accounts showed a profit on the sale of these. The issue the EFL had was that these were not show at a fair value rate, so if the club buys them back for £1 each the FFP rules/EFL might insist the club records this at Fair Value again, otherwise clubs will just keep selling and buying back their stadium.

Suspect they may have to create an umbrella company with the 3 separate companies underneath that.

In that appearance at the Common committee the other week, Rick Parry said something about the EFL not liking clubs selling stadiums to their owners to generate a profit and had now closed this loop hole. So they might be very supportive of everything being brought back under one company.


User avatar
tmesis
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2829
Joined: 16 Aug 2013 20:26

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by tmesis » 26 Jan 2024 11:33

WestYorksRoyal
Stranded
Hound Interesting interview

Does make you wonder what the hell Smudger Smith was going on about. Clearly absolute nonsense fed to him there


Yes, the interview does make that "leak" even more damaging for him and his follow up about things changing already seem even more bizarre. Of course, Howe, could be painting a very specific picture but IF TRUE, does appear that we are still a good couple of weeks away from a decision being made on which opportunity (as Howe put it) the club/owner will move forward with.

It was a politicians interview. Not lying, but also being diplomatic. Certainly relatively complimentary of Dai which will be a stick for conspiracy theorists to beat him with, but what do you expect him to say when the survival of the club depends on dealing with him?

But I'm rightfully skeptical when people say Dai is committed to selling. Last May he was committed to funding the club, this autumn he was going to sell. He's unreliable and clearly has limited communication with people working for him.

I always hang onto hope, but this hell only ends when everything is confirmed.

I do feel "committed to selling" really means no more than being willing to sell at the right price. That 'right price' might have lowered though.

The thought of the club being sold but Dai keeping the stadium is a bit of a nightmare, as he'd basically have us over a barrel, unless we got owners rich enough to build us a new stadium somewhere...and I'm not holding out much hope of that.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6274
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 26 Jan 2024 11:36

If he kept the stadium, the rent would surely be negotiated alongside the sale. Any sensible buyer would want to lock in a fair rent for 5-10 years. So whilst it's not the best outcome, it would not be the disaster some fear.

User avatar
Brogue
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13593
Joined: 02 Mar 2021 20:38
Location: Getting things done

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Brogue » 26 Jan 2024 11:37

for anyone who hasn't heard the interview, its here https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0h753jn

Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 20253
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Stranded » 26 Jan 2024 11:52

WestYorksRoyal If he kept the stadium, the rent would surely be negotiated alongside the sale. Any sensible buyer would want to lock in a fair rent for 5-10 years. So whilst it's not the best outcome, it would not be the disaster some fear.


This. If it gets a deal done, then continuing to pay rent (remember the club pay Dai rent now) is not a big deal esp if the deal is worded along the lines of "Rent will be X for Y years. Club will have the right to purchase the stadium at (set price) at any point up to and including (agreed date)"

User avatar
72 bus
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2264
Joined: 16 Mar 2005 11:01

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by 72 bus » 26 Jan 2024 12:17

Stranded
WestYorksRoyal If he kept the stadium, the rent would surely be negotiated alongside the sale. Any sensible buyer would want to lock in a fair rent for 5-10 years. So whilst it's not the best outcome, it would not be the disaster some fear.


This. If it gets a deal done, then continuing to pay rent (remember the club pay Dai rent now) is not a big deal esp if the deal is worded along the lines of "Rent will be X for Y years. Club will have the right to purchase the stadium at (set price) at any point up to and including (agreed date)"


That's what Ashley did with Headingley and why he was interested in the SCL

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 42855
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 26 Jan 2024 12:39

I find it shocking this interview shows Dai and Pang have been lying to us for months about trying to sell.

RFCMod
Member
Posts: 771
Joined: 28 Apr 2005 12:39
Location: Deep in the woods of Hampshire

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by RFCMod » 26 Jan 2024 12:43

Ever since the Chinese guy came in to buy Reading Gaol I have this recurring nightmare that this is a grand wind up by Yongge that sees the consortium make an offer for the football club and Dai selling to them only to reveal its his long lost son and we're screwed well and truly

Its been a long week

6094 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Jammy Dodger and 215 guests

It is currently 01 Dec 2024 09:42