CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

6094 posts
Royal_jimmy
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5179
Joined: 10 Aug 2011 10:44
Location: Planet Earth

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Royal_jimmy » 10 Mar 2024 17:05

Dai just needs to sell the club and fcuk off. Need to get Bearwood as an asset of community value so Dai can't do much with that land at all.

User avatar
Dirk Gently
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11880
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 13:54

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Dirk Gently » 10 Mar 2024 18:22

The Prisoner Knowing a little bit about insolvency protocol one massive no no is hiving off assets prior to any form of insolvency process beginning.

If D*I thinks he can flog Bearwood for mega money (or any money!) and then he walk away HMRC take the dimmest view known to man on people who do that. They will perceive that as having removed cash from an insolvent business that should first and foremost have been ring fenced to meet HMRC obligations.

HMRC post pandemic have taken on a whole new mr nasty persona - there are thousands of companies who owe them money but during and after Covid there was a moratorium on winding companies up. That period of grace has now finished and they are going hard after debts, directors who fraudulently got bounce back loans etc. who fobbed them off for years during Covid.

Time was HMRC would work with companies and agree to administration as a solution for a company to try and trade through problems. Now they go straight for liquidation as it’s the most transparent way of seeing what assets are there for them.

You can sell an asset for market value as long as the proceeds are used legitimately. You can’t just sell it to a mate for less than it’s worth or even sell it for market value and grab the money unless you can continue to trade solvently.

If he was to sell it for millions and then liquidate HMRC would pursue him personally for that money plus and overdrawn directors loan (if he has taken anything it).

There is a lot of protective legislation to prevent assets being raided.


No arguments with any of that - but perhaps Dai thinks he's outside the jurisdiction of HMRC?

Greatwesternline
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6597
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 14:36

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Greatwesternline » 10 Mar 2024 18:23

The Prisoner Knowing a little bit about insolvency protocol one massive no no is hiving off assets prior to any form of insolvency process beginning.

If D*I thinks he can flog Bearwood for mega money (or any money!) and then he walk away HMRC take the dimmest view known to man on people who do that. They will perceive that as having removed cash from an insolvent business that should first and foremost have been ring fenced to meet HMRC obligations.

HMRC post pandemic have taken on a whole new mr nasty persona - there are thousands of companies who owe them money but during and after Covid there was a moratorium on winding companies up. That period of grace has now finished and they are going hard after debts, directors who fraudulently got bounce back loans etc. who fobbed them off for years during Covid.

Time was HMRC would work with companies and agree to administration as a solution for a company to try and trade through problems. Now they go straight for liquidation as it’s the most transparent way of seeing what assets are there for them.

You can sell an asset for market value as long as the proceeds are used legitimately. You can’t just sell it to a mate for less than it’s worth or even sell it for market value and grab the money unless you can continue to trade solvently.

If he was to sell it for millions and then liquidate HMRC would pursue him personally for that money plus and overdrawn directors loan (if he has taken anything it).

There is a lot of protective legislation to prevent assets being raided.


This is all true in a scenario where a company owes HMRC money but as it stands at the moment we don't.

A charitable way of looking at this statement is they are looking for a sale and leaseback to realise some working capital to keep the club alive until the takeover.

A less charitable one is he is trying to get a bit of negotiating power with potential buyers if a good offer does come in for Bearwood.

The least charitable view is he is asset stripping for his own funds.

User avatar
rabidbee
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3664
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 17:51
Location: Like a dog to vomit

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by rabidbee » 10 Mar 2024 19:19

WestYorksRoyal A couple of journos reporting that it's historical land with listed buildings, so not something a developer will buy on a whim.

Not only are the buildings listed but the grounds are in a scheduled park, which is within the confines of an ancient deer park of the royal forest. I’d be surprised if there’s any potential for housing.

https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/ ... ry/1000414

User avatar
PieEater
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6545
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 15:42
Location: Comfortably numb

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by PieEater » 10 Mar 2024 20:05

The Prisoner Knowing a little bit about insolvency protocol one massive no no is hiving off assets prior to any form of insolvency process beginning.

If D*I thinks he can flog Bearwood for mega money (or any money!) and then he walk away HMRC take the dimmest view known to man on people who do that. They will perceive that as having removed cash from an insolvent business that should first and foremost have been ring fenced to meet HMRC obligations.

HMRC post pandemic have taken on a whole new mr nasty persona - there are thousands of companies who owe them money but during and after Covid there was a moratorium on winding companies up. That period of grace has now finished and they are going hard after debts, directors who fraudulently got bounce back loans etc. who fobbed them off for years during Covid.

Time was HMRC would work with companies and agree to administration as a solution for a company to try and trade through problems. Now they go straight for liquidation as it’s the most transparent way of seeing what assets are there for them.

You can sell an asset for market value as long as the proceeds are used legitimately. You can’t just sell it to a mate for less than it’s worth or even sell it for market value and grab the money unless you can continue to trade solvently.

If he was to sell it for millions and then liquidate HMRC would pursue him personally for that money plus and overdrawn directors loan (if he has taken anything it).

There is a lot of protective legislation to prevent assets being raided.


He probably thinks they can't touch him in China.


User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 18325
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Pepe the Horseman » 10 Mar 2024 21:04

Stranded Hey maybe Madjeski was being shown around as he's about to buy it.

No? Me neither...

I mean he's got nothing else to spend his money on.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6274
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 10 Mar 2024 21:09

PieEater
The Prisoner Knowing a little bit about insolvency protocol one massive no no is hiving off assets prior to any form of insolvency process beginning.

If D*I thinks he can flog Bearwood for mega money (or any money!) and then he walk away HMRC take the dimmest view known to man on people who do that. They will perceive that as having removed cash from an insolvent business that should first and foremost have been ring fenced to meet HMRC obligations.

HMRC post pandemic have taken on a whole new mr nasty persona - there are thousands of companies who owe them money but during and after Covid there was a moratorium on winding companies up. That period of grace has now finished and they are going hard after debts, directors who fraudulently got bounce back loans etc. who fobbed them off for years during Covid.

Time was HMRC would work with companies and agree to administration as a solution for a company to try and trade through problems. Now they go straight for liquidation as it’s the most transparent way of seeing what assets are there for them.

You can sell an asset for market value as long as the proceeds are used legitimately. You can’t just sell it to a mate for less than it’s worth or even sell it for market value and grab the money unless you can continue to trade solvently.

If he was to sell it for millions and then liquidate HMRC would pursue him personally for that money plus and overdrawn directors loan (if he has taken anything it).

There is a lot of protective legislation to prevent assets being raided.


He probably thinks they can't touch him in China.

He likes his Mayfair lifestyle, could kiss that goodbye.

windermereROYAL
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8376
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 11:18

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by windermereROYAL » 10 Mar 2024 23:26

Royal_jimmy Dai just needs to sell the club and fcuk off. Need to get Bearwood as an asset of community value so Dai can't do much with that land at all.


Can`t do that if it`s not open for public use.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 42855
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 10 Mar 2024 23:38

The signs of doom keep on stacking up.


Stranded
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 20253
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Stranded » 11 Mar 2024 08:55

Snowflake Royal The signs of doom keep on stacking up.


Yep, come to terms that the club is done unless I'm pleasantly surprised by something coming from left wing.

Just feels like the twat is "winning".

Coming to peace with the fact and looks like I may just take my boy to Eintracht games.

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20303
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Undiscovered pyramid somewhere in Egypt

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Sutekh » 11 Mar 2024 09:15

Stranded
Snowflake Royal The signs of doom keep on stacking up.


Yep, come to terms that the club is done unless I'm pleasantly surprised by something coming from left wing.

Just feels like the twat is "winning".

Coming to peace with the fact and looks like I may just take my boy to Eintracht games.


Given Azeez's current form, glad nothing's being expected from the right wing.

under the tin
Member
Posts: 973
Joined: 15 Jan 2010 09:21

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by under the tin » 11 Mar 2024 09:42

Sutekh
Stranded
Snowflake Royal The signs of doom keep on stacking up.


Yep, come to terms that the club is done unless I'm pleasantly surprised by something coming from left wing.

Just feels like the twat is "winning".

Coming to peace with the fact and looks like I may just take my boy to Eintracht games.


Given Azeez's current form, glad nothing's being expected from the "far right" wing.

Topically edited for you, Sutes. 8)

What the news about Bearwood screams at me is that there's definitely no money whatsoever coming out of China anymore, and whether that's directly down to Dai or the authorities is irrelevant.
Looks like It's going to end up with buckets being rattled outside football grounds asking for donations towards a paddle before season's end as we're now some way along sh1t creek.

under the tin
Member
Posts: 973
Joined: 15 Jan 2010 09:21

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by under the tin » 11 Mar 2024 09:43

Sutekh
Stranded
Snowflake Royal The signs of doom keep on stacking up.


Yep, come to terms that the club is done unless I'm pleasantly surprised by something coming from left wing.

Just feels like the twat is "winning".

Coming to peace with the fact and looks like I may just take my boy to Eintracht games.


Given Azeez's current form, glad nothing's being expected from the "far right" wing.

Topically edited for you, Sutes. 8)

What the news about Bearwood screams at me is that there's definitely no money whatsoever coming out of China anymore, and whether that's directly down to Dai or the authorities is irrelevant.
Looks like It's going to end up with buckets being rattled outside football grounds asking for donations towards a paddle before season's end as we're now some way along sh1t creek.


WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6274
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 11 Mar 2024 09:56

Yeh, whether by choice or circumstance (I suspect the former) we're not getting a penny more from Dai.

The only hope is that SCL, other local businesses and wealthy fans can cobble together enough to see us through until the end of the season and in that time we find a buyer. As SBWD have said this morning, collection buckets and just giving pages will barely touch the sides.

This is where the industry needs to change. There is easily enough money in the game to save us. There should be an insolvency fund. Place us into administration, deduct 12 points to relegate us but crucially find a buyer. Proceeds of the sale pay off administrator, then reimburse the fund and Dai gets the leftovers.

blythspartan
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2416
Joined: 05 Jun 2012 20:50

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by blythspartan » 11 Mar 2024 10:10

I was chatting to a few mates/cousins yesterday and the general consensus was we’re as good as finished.

As mentioned above, there is enough money in football to help clubs in our situation, but it’s never going to happen as the greedy oxf*rd in the Premiership don’t like sharing. I’d like to think that when we become the first ex premier league team to go bust it will open up a few eyes, but in reality only Reading fans will really care. There might be a few mutterings on Sky for a while and then it’ll be forgotten.

windermereROYAL
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8376
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 11:18

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by windermereROYAL » 11 Mar 2024 10:20

All the players will become free agents, most of them won`t have too many problems finding new clubs, and quite frankly they will be happy to be released from this shit show.
Just wonder what will happen to the stadium, it will still be there for quite a while and a reminder of what used to be.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6274
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 11 Mar 2024 10:24

windermereROYAL All the players will become free agents, most of them won`t have too many problems finding new clubs, and quite frankly they will be happy to be released from this shit show.

Will they all? Who would take Dean and Button? Or players like Abrefa and John Clarke who threatened to impact the 1st team but have had brutal injuries?

And that's before you look at all the U18s, U16s etc., where will they go? The nearest academies are in London and hard to get into (as in competitively, not geographically)

Footballing careers will be lost because of this, even if the likes of Wing, Smith etc., will be fine.

Orion1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3597
Joined: 14 Jul 2020 09:08
Location: Shut up, dick

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Orion1871 » 11 Mar 2024 10:31

windermereROYAL All the players will become free agents, most of them won`t have too many problems finding new clubs, and quite frankly they will be happy to be released from this shit show.
Just wonder what will happen to the stadium, it will still be there for quite a while and a reminder of what used to be.


The Thais will probably buy the land and use it to expand their development.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6274
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 11 Mar 2024 10:39

Orion1871
windermereROYAL All the players will become free agents, most of them won`t have too many problems finding new clubs, and quite frankly they will be happy to be released from this shit show.
Just wonder what will happen to the stadium, it will still be there for quite a while and a reminder of what used to be.


The Thais will probably buy the land and use it to expand their development.

Haha, good luck. Stadium is protected, and any development will need the help of the council who will presumably be extremely hostile towards anyone looking to profit from the demise of Reading FC.

User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11779
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by RoyalBlue » 11 Mar 2024 10:40

Orion1871
windermereROYAL All the players will become free agents, most of them won`t have too many problems finding new clubs, and quite frankly they will be happy to be released from this shit show.
Just wonder what will happen to the stadium, it will still be there for quite a while and a reminder of what used to be.


The Thais will probably buy the land and use it to expand their development.


Talking of the Thais, they need to ask for their money back from this guy!

https://www.getreading.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/reading-fcs-thai-owners-follow-11294150

6094 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 203 guests

It is currently 01 Dec 2024 09:13