Silver Foxgenome Twitter really is nonsense now isn't it. Looking at the #readingfc hashtag for up-to-d8 news and it's full of completely unrelated spam and even porn.
Link please
www.twitter.com
by genome » 14 Mar 2024 11:10
Silver Foxgenome Twitter really is nonsense now isn't it. Looking at the #readingfc hashtag for up-to-d8 news and it's full of completely unrelated spam and even porn.
Link please
by NathStPaul » 14 Mar 2024 11:11
HoundNathStPaulSnowflake Royal Bunch of stupid pcunts.
Absolutely. Makes my blood boil.
Sell Before We Dai make another blunder.
Why?
It’s a protest against Dai not Wycombe. Wouldn’t be bad press at all if you get some photos of Reading and Wycombe fans together peacefully protesting against Dai
Obviously it needs to be 100% on our tosser owner not WwFc or their owner
by Hound » 14 Mar 2024 11:13
NathStPaulHoundNathStPaul Absolutely. Makes my blood boil.
Sell Before We Dai make another blunder.
Why?
It’s a protest against Dai not Wycombe. Wouldn’t be bad press at all if you get some photos of Reading and Wycombe fans together peacefully protesting against Dai
Obviously it needs to be 100% on our tosser owner not WwFc or their owner
Because it encourages anger against Wycombe as a football club which is wrong. We have no business being anywhere near their ground protesting.
by WestYorksRoyal » 14 Mar 2024 11:14
by Gunny Fishcake » 14 Mar 2024 11:14
by NathStPaul » 14 Mar 2024 11:20
HoundNathStPaulHound
Why?
It’s a protest against Dai not Wycombe. Wouldn’t be bad press at all if you get some photos of Reading and Wycombe fans together peacefully protesting against Dai
Obviously it needs to be 100% on our tosser owner not WwFc or their owner
Because it encourages anger against Wycombe as a football club which is wrong. We have no business being anywhere near their ground protesting.
Not if WWFC fans are there and endorse
I’m not saying it’ll do any good - the other protests haven’t much as we’d link to think they would - but I can’t criticise people for trying something however pointless it seems
Better that than sitting on here whinging (which is exactly what I’m doing fwiw)
by Hound » 14 Mar 2024 11:24
NathStPaulHoundNathStPaul Because it encourages anger against Wycombe as a football club which is wrong. We have no business being anywhere near their ground protesting.
Not if WWFC fans are there and endorse
I’m not saying it’ll do any good - the other protests haven’t much as we’d link to think they would - but I can’t criticise people for trying something however pointless it seems
Better that than sitting on here whinging (which is exactly what I’m doing fwiw)
Find it hard to believe any Wycombe supporter would be against a great deal for their club (on paper). Our issues aren't their issues.
by NathStPaul » 14 Mar 2024 11:28
HoundNathStPaulHound
Not if WWFC fans are there and endorse
I’m not saying it’ll do any good - the other protests haven’t much as we’d link to think they would - but I can’t criticise people for trying something however pointless it seems
Better that than sitting on here whinging (which is exactly what I’m doing fwiw)
Find it hard to believe any Wycombe supporter would be against a great deal for their club (on paper). Our issues aren't their issues.
Exactly why it’s great PR if they do get some to turn up
Let’s face it it’s desperation time - I can’t think of anything we can actually do to help, but again not going to snipe at people trying
by tmesis » 14 Mar 2024 11:48
NathStPaulHoundNathStPaul Find it hard to believe any Wycombe supporter would be against a great deal for their club (on paper). Our issues aren't their issues.
Exactly why it’s great PR if they do get some to turn up
Let’s face it it’s desperation time - I can’t think of anything we can actually do to help, but again not going to snipe at people trying
It is desperation time you're right. With that in mind the supporters have to do things that get national interest. The pitch invasion got that. We need to go along those lines rather than sending 5 virgins to Addams Park on a Thursday night.
by Snowflake Royal » 14 Mar 2024 12:25
HoundNathStPaulSnowflake Royal Bunch of stupid pcunts.
Absolutely. Makes my blood boil.
Sell Before We Dai make another blunder.
Why?
It’s a protest against Dai not Wycombe. Wouldn’t be bad press at all if you get some photos of Reading and Wycombe fans together peacefully protesting against Dai
Obviously it needs to be 100% on our tosser owner not WwFc or their owner
by Pepe the Horseman » 14 Mar 2024 12:33
Winston Biscuit blaming Wycombe just seems a bit childish tbh
by Hound » 14 Mar 2024 12:41
Snowflake RoyalHoundNathStPaul Absolutely. Makes my blood boil.
Sell Before We Dai make another blunder.
Why?
It’s a protest against Dai not Wycombe. Wouldn’t be bad press at all if you get some photos of Reading and Wycombe fans together peacefully protesting against Dai
Obviously it needs to be 100% on our tosser owner not WwFc or their owner
Did you not read the bit about it being at Adams Park, against the Wycombe owner and that if Wycombe fans didn’t join them they'd be considered the same as MK Dons?
by Snowflake Royal » 14 Mar 2024 12:58
HoundSnowflake RoyalHound
Why?
It’s a protest against Dai not Wycombe. Wouldn’t be bad press at all if you get some photos of Reading and Wycombe fans together peacefully protesting against Dai
Obviously it needs to be 100% on our tosser owner not WwFc or their owner
Did you not read the bit about it being at Adams Park, against the Wycombe owner and that if Wycombe fans didn’t join them they'd be considered the same as MK Dons?
Yeah the mk dons bit is pathetic but it doesn’t say it’s against the Wycombe chap. In fact it doesn’t say what the protest is against exactly.
by rabidbee » 14 Mar 2024 12:58
by Snowflake Royal » 14 Mar 2024 13:03
rabidbee If you want to protest, have it at the Mad Stad (or Bearwood?). You could even invite Wycombe fans to join if they want to show solidarity. Make the protest about Reading, and Dai, not about Wycombe, basically.
by NathStPaul » 14 Mar 2024 13:27
by genome » 14 Mar 2024 13:31
NathStPaul Nobody has to Dai.
by NathStPaul » 14 Mar 2024 13:33
genomeNathStPaul Nobody has to Dai.
Come on, it was right there.
by genome » 14 Mar 2024 13:35
NathStPaulgenomeNathStPaul Nobody has to Dai.
Come on, it was right there.
I realised it, came back to edit, then saw you got there first. You're too quick for me.
by SouthDownsRoyal » 14 Mar 2024 13:52
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 188 guests