SutekhGreatwesternlineSutekh
If one of the parties is in legal debt to the FL then I would presume they should have some recourse if a said party then makes money out of what is the sale of a club asset. And isn't Bearwood owned by the club still, not in some private holding company like the ground (which will no doubt be sold next month).
That's not how life works. If i owe you money, but i sell my car to someone else, you don't have a right to my money from the car sale.
Also Dai doesnt "owe" money to the EFL. They've fined him. But that isnt a legal debt. It's a penalty, which has no legal status.
Penalty clauses aren't enforceable. The EFL isn't a statutory body, its fines have no basis in law. It's just a punishment for being in breach of a competition rule.
Rather makes the whole ffp thing utterly ****** pointless then if all the FL can do is take points away rather than actually hurt the planks that cause it all in the first place.
Wonder how much the PL lobbyists will manage to get the useless politicians to water down any proposed financial regulator by?
Indeed. fines rely on people wanting to carry on being involved in football. If you dont care about being involved in football in England anymore, fines from the EFL mean absolutely nothing to you.
Same as if you don't want to be a member of a golf club anymore, and you get barred for not paying your membership fees, being barred from the clubhouse probably doesnt matter to you.