by WestYorksRoyal » 16 Mar 2024 09:20
by Sutekh » 16 Mar 2024 09:25
WestYorksRoyal I know I should be skeptical, but this does feel like the one. Not much room for Dai to move the goalposts as the stadium needs a club with it. It seems like Pang and Dai are involved given the training ground sale, plus I trust Earnshaw not to report it without covering off this point.
The main blockers I see are Wokingham council rejecting the change in planning permission as we all wanted them to yesterday, and on the pitch performances threatening relegation.
Win today and get the deal done to stave off additional points deductions and you'd say relegation risk is 5% max.
by PieEater » 16 Mar 2024 09:34
SutekhWestYorksRoyal I know I should be skeptical, but this does feel like the one. Not much room for Dai to move the goalposts as the stadium needs a club with it. It seems like Pang and Dai are involved given the training ground sale, plus I trust Earnshaw not to report it without covering off this point.
The main blockers I see are Wokingham council rejecting the change in planning permission as we all wanted them to yesterday, and on the pitch performances threatening relegation.
Win today and get the deal done to stave off additional points deductions and you'd say relegation risk is 5% max.
Apparently the separate Bearwood sale came out of nowhere and caught NH on the hop as much as everyone else. Really can't wait to get these two serial communication failures finally out of the club.
by Snowflake Royal » 16 Mar 2024 09:58
WestYorksRoyal People have been crying out for us to be sustainable. Now a potential buyer is trying to buy us in a form with affordable costs, everyone is questioning it. If you buy Reading with Bearwood and everything, you need to stabilise as a Championship club quickly to make sense. Do we want owners who make that the cornerstone of their strategy, given a season can be ruin by injuries, referee performances and many other non controllables?
by rabidbee » 16 Mar 2024 10:01
by Snowflake Royal » 16 Mar 2024 10:04
rabidbee No plan has been communicated to us, who are not actually party to the deal. It may be that the final deal includes provisions for us to continue training there until we find a new training ground.
by andrew1957 » 16 Mar 2024 10:07
by Loafer » 16 Mar 2024 10:09
by traff » 16 Mar 2024 10:16
Loafer i have heard on the grapevine that a takeover is imminent from somebody who goes to the same hairdresser as ruben selles
by windermereROYAL » 16 Mar 2024 10:18
Loafer i have heard on the grapevine that a takeover is imminent from somebody who goes to the same hairdresser as ruben selles
by Loafer » 16 Mar 2024 10:52
windermereROYALLoafer i have heard on the grapevine that a takeover is imminent from somebody who goes to the same hairdresser as ruben selles
Must be true then if you posted it, break out the champers.
by rabidbee » 16 Mar 2024 10:52
andrew1957 Some are talking about Bearwood and the Academy being too expensive in L1 but I disagree. Surely the Academy can be a very profitable entity if you have owners with money. The likes of Nelson Abbey could have been sold in a couple of years for millions if he kept progressing as he was let alone Vickers and Harris. We let them all go for pence because the owner had no money. I honestly believe that we would get back to Championship status far quicker with the Academy continuing than by just buying or loaning other clubs cast offs. A well run Academy can be a great financial success.
Reading FC without a Cat 1 Academy just becomes another small struggling club whereas with a strong Academy and patient owners you can see us getting back to the PL eventually.
Where it all went wrong for Dai was not spending money on Bearwood and the Academy (which were investments) but spanking millions on Aluko, Jaoa, Pusca and a huge contract for Moore + others in a desperate gamble to get to the PL in a couple of seasons. If instead Dai had sold the likes of Moore when he had the chance and built the team with Academy youngsters and free transfers we would likely still be in the Championship and not in this awful mess.
by windermereROYAL » 16 Mar 2024 10:54
by The Royal Forester » 16 Mar 2024 10:56
by Orion1871 » 16 Mar 2024 11:39
rabidbeeandrew1957 Some are talking about Bearwood and the Academy being too expensive in L1 but I disagree. Surely the Academy can be a very profitable entity if you have owners with money. The likes of Nelson Abbey could have been sold in a couple of years for millions if he kept progressing as he was let alone Vickers and Harris. We let them all go for pence because the owner had no money. I honestly believe that we would get back to Championship status far quicker with the Academy continuing than by just buying or loaning other clubs cast offs. A well run Academy can be a great financial success.
Reading FC without a Cat 1 Academy just becomes another small struggling club whereas with a strong Academy and patient owners you can see us getting back to the PL eventually.
Where it all went wrong for Dai was not spending money on Bearwood and the Academy (which were investments) but spanking millions on Aluko, Jaoa, Pusca and a huge contract for Moore + others in a desperate gamble to get to the PL in a couple of seasons. If instead Dai had sold the likes of Moore when he had the chance and built the team with Academy youngsters and free transfers we would likely still be in the Championship and not in this awful mess.
I do broadly agree, especially as I seem to recall that spending on the academy isn’t counted towards FFP. However, opting not to maintain the expense of a cat 1 academy is not the same as opting to have no academy. They go right down to cat 4.
by Winston Biscuit » 16 Mar 2024 11:42
by Snowflake Royal » 16 Mar 2024 11:44
rabidbeeandrew1957 Some are talking about Bearwood and the Academy being too expensive in L1 but I disagree. Surely the Academy can be a very profitable entity if you have owners with money. The likes of Nelson Abbey could have been sold in a couple of years for millions if he kept progressing as he was let alone Vickers and Harris. We let them all go for pence because the owner had no money. I honestly believe that we would get back to Championship status far quicker with the Academy continuing than by just buying or loaning other clubs cast offs. A well run Academy can be a great financial success.
Reading FC without a Cat 1 Academy just becomes another small struggling club whereas with a strong Academy and patient owners you can see us getting back to the PL eventually.
Where it all went wrong for Dai was not spending money on Bearwood and the Academy (which were investments) but spanking millions on Aluko, Jaoa, Pusca and a huge contract for Moore + others in a desperate gamble to get to the PL in a couple of seasons. If instead Dai had sold the likes of Moore when he had the chance and built the team with Academy youngsters and free transfers we would likely still be in the Championship and not in this awful mess.
I do broadly agree, especially as I seem to recall that spending on the academy isn’t counted towards FFP. However, opting not to maintain the expense of a cat 1 academy is not the same as opting to have no academy. They go right down to cat 4.
by SouthDownsRoyal » 16 Mar 2024 11:47
Winston Biscuit Pang's anonymous account tweeting that it'll be announced on Thurs
by andrew1957 » 16 Mar 2024 11:52
Snowflake Royalrabidbeeandrew1957 Some are talking about Bearwood and the Academy being too expensive in L1 but I disagree. Surely the Academy can be a very profitable entity if you have owners with money. The likes of Nelson Abbey could have been sold in a couple of years for millions if he kept progressing as he was let alone Vickers and Harris. We let them all go for pence because the owner had no money. I honestly believe that we would get back to Championship status far quicker with the Academy continuing than by just buying or loaning other clubs cast offs. A well run Academy can be a great financial success.
Reading FC without a Cat 1 Academy just becomes another small struggling club whereas with a strong Academy and patient owners you can see us getting back to the PL eventually.
Where it all went wrong for Dai was not spending money on Bearwood and the Academy (which were investments) but spanking millions on Aluko, Jaoa, Pusca and a huge contract for Moore + others in a desperate gamble to get to the PL in a couple of seasons. If instead Dai had sold the likes of Moore when he had the chance and built the team with Academy youngsters and free transfers we would likely still be in the Championship and not in this awful mess.
I do broadly agree, especially as I seem to recall that spending on the academy isn’t counted towards FFP. However, opting not to maintain the expense of a cat 1 academy is not the same as opting to have no academy. They go right down to cat 4.
It's not so much about the financial rules it's about financial stability. And a L1 club can't afford the £2m - £5m for a Cat 1 Academy when income is about £8m. But yes, completely right that its not about getting rid of the Academy, although clubs like Brentford manage perfectly well without one with good scouting and selling. It's about (hopefully temporarily) downgrading it to make it affordable.
by WestYorksRoyal » 16 Mar 2024 11:52
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 230 guests