Reading4eva This is it!
https://twitter.com/HuangKad/status/176 ... nt0Pg&s=19
Finally might the club be emerging from this hell!
Why are Bournemouth in hell? They are a midtable Premier League side.
by NathStPaul » 15 Mar 2024 19:59
Reading4eva This is it!
https://twitter.com/HuangKad/status/176 ... nt0Pg&s=19
Finally might the club be emerging from this hell!
by Hound » 15 Mar 2024 20:03
by Winston Biscuit » 15 Mar 2024 20:04
Reading4eva This is it!
https://twitter.com/HuangKad/status/176 ... nt0Pg&s=19
Finally might the club be emerging from this hell!
by Snowflake Royal » 15 Mar 2024 20:13
Hound Wonder how far we’d be from being self sustainable if we
Sold the training ground
Sold off Smith, Wing, Knibbs, Savage and Azeez (compensation) in the summer and any academy lads we could
Found a cheap training ground
Disbanded the Academy
Continued to use the SCL which remains owned by Yongge and we continue to pay the 1m p/a or whatever it was
Be a fairly miserable existence but possibility that’s where it’s going
by Snowflake Royal » 15 Mar 2024 20:15
WestYorksRoyalHound Wonder how far we’d be from being self sustainable if we
Sold the training ground
Sold off Smith, Wing, Knibbs, Savage and Azeez (compensation) in the summer and any academy lads we could
Found a cheap training ground
Disbanded the Academy
Continued to use the SCL which remains owned by Yongge and we continue to pay the 1m p/a or whatever it was
Be a fairly miserable existence but possibility that’s where it’s going
Very plausible imo. But eventually he'd leave somehow. We'd probably be looking at boycotts to force his hand.
by Lower West » 15 Mar 2024 22:52
Snowflake RoyalWestYorksRoyalHound Wonder how far we’d be from being self sustainable if we
Sold the training ground
Sold off Smith, Wing, Knibbs, Savage and Azeez (compensation) in the summer and any academy lads we could
Found a cheap training ground
Disbanded the Academy
Continued to use the SCL which remains owned by Yongge and we continue to pay the 1m p/a or whatever it was
Be a fairly miserable existence but possibility that’s where it’s going
Very plausible imo. But eventually he'd leave somehow. We'd probably be looking at boycotts to force his hand.
If he rents the SCL to us, we simply confirm the deal and whether he's responsible for maintenance (likely ) then oxf*rd trash it every week.
by SouthDownsRoyal » 15 Mar 2024 22:57
windermereROYAL
by SouthDownsRoyal » 15 Mar 2024 23:00
NathStPaulReading4eva This is it!
https://twitter.com/HuangKad/status/176 ... nt0Pg&s=19
Finally might the club be emerging from this hell!
Why are Bournemouth in hell? They are a midtable Premier League side.
by SouthDownsRoyal » 15 Mar 2024 23:13
Winston BiscuitReading4eva This is it!
https://twitter.com/HuangKad/status/176 ... nt0Pg&s=19
Finally might the club be emerging from this hell!
What about your online petition?!
by Sutekh » 16 Mar 2024 07:20
by The Green Programme » 16 Mar 2024 17:29
leonThe Green ProgrammeLoafer When are we going to start violent protests with weapons and smashing the place up?
A ‘regulator’!!!!
It’s such a bizarre response.
Just think about what you are saying.
Who pays for it (look out for the gravy train)
Who decides what they regulate and what they don’t?
And what does it mean - another layer of bureaucracy… more cost to fans ….
Be careful what you wish for.
The FCA and the Labour Government (in an attempt to beat the market-end boom and bust yawn yawn) and give some real power to the regulator by employing totally inexperienced graduates……managed such levels of ineptitude that they allowed record lending to those who couldn’t afford it after the sale of all our mutual companies (bribery by shareholding) and a resultant crash of the banks….
Whilst happily raking in the taxes during the lending spree - and then managing to overspend on that….
Hurray for regulation…...
We will be paying for it for years and years….
We (RFC) are in the crap - it will be resolved and we will move on….
Foreign owners; relying on offshore structures for financing should not be able to purchase clubs in UK.
Some of what has allegedly gone on at City is outrageous but they will probably get away with it all, If they don’t, they’ll be going out of business.
The current ‘regulators’ won’t allow it…..
Hurray for FFP….
You’re a fool
by From Despair To Where? » 16 Mar 2024 17:48
by Snowflake Royal » 16 Mar 2024 18:12
The Green ProgrammeleonThe Green Programme
A ‘regulator’!!!!
It’s such a bizarre response.
Just think about what you are saying.
Who pays for it (look out for the gravy train)
Who decides what they regulate and what they don’t?
And what does it mean - another layer of bureaucracy… more cost to fans ….
Be careful what you wish for.
The FCA and the Labour Government (in an attempt to beat the market-end boom and bust yawn yawn) and give some real power to the regulator by employing totally inexperienced graduates……managed such levels of ineptitude that they allowed record lending to those who couldn’t afford it after the sale of all our mutual companies (bribery by shareholding) and a resultant crash of the banks….
Whilst happily raking in the taxes during the lending spree - and then managing to overspend on that….
Hurray for regulation…...
We will be paying for it for years and years….
We (RFC) are in the crap - it will be resolved and we will move on….
Foreign owners; relying on offshore structures for financing should not be able to purchase clubs in UK.
Some of what has allegedly gone on at City is outrageous but they will probably get away with it all, If they don’t, they’ll be going out of business.
The current ‘regulators’ won’t allow it…..
Hurray for FFP….
You’re a fool
And you are probably a Socialist who can propagate two or more totally contradictory principles simultaneously and cannot make a reasoned case for anything - and instead, simply makes silly (or worse) insulting personal comments.
The most regulated markets are often the most corrupted, the most ineffective and the most expensive.
The Banks were regulated by a socialist government…. and that went really well…..
That answer is to penalise Clubs in real time - not retrospectively.
It’s the retrospective penalties and the chance of avoiding them that leads to owners taking every risk to get to the promised land - succeed and all is fine (Villa, Bournemouth etc) fail and you become a bankrupt (Derby, Southampton, Wigan,, Reading etc).
No more quangos for us all to fund thank you.
by Elm Park Kid » 16 Mar 2024 18:27
The Green ProgrammeleonThe Green Programme
A ‘regulator’!!!!
It’s such a bizarre response.
Just think about what you are saying.
Who pays for it (look out for the gravy train)
Who decides what they regulate and what they don’t?
And what does it mean - another layer of bureaucracy… more cost to fans ….
Be careful what you wish for.
The FCA and the Labour Government (in an attempt to beat the market-end boom and bust yawn yawn) and give some real power to the regulator by employing totally inexperienced graduates……managed such levels of ineptitude that they allowed record lending to those who couldn’t afford it after the sale of all our mutual companies (bribery by shareholding) and a resultant crash of the banks….
Whilst happily raking in the taxes during the lending spree - and then managing to overspend on that….
Hurray for regulation…...
We will be paying for it for years and years….
We (RFC) are in the crap - it will be resolved and we will move on….
Foreign owners; relying on offshore structures for financing should not be able to purchase clubs in UK.
Some of what has allegedly gone on at City is outrageous but they will probably get away with it all, If they don’t, they’ll be going out of business.
The current ‘regulators’ won’t allow it…..
Hurray for FFP….
You’re a fool
And you are probably a Socialist who can propagate two or more totally contradictory principles simultaneously and cannot make a reasoned case for anything - and instead, simply makes silly (or worse) insulting personal comments.
The most regulated markets are often the most corrupted, the most ineffective and the most expensive.
The Banks were regulated by a socialist government…. and that went really well…..
That answer is to penalise Clubs in real time - not retrospectively.
It’s the retrospective penalties and the chance of avoiding them that leads to owners taking every risk to get to the promised land - succeed and all is fine (Villa, Bournemouth etc) fail and you become a bankrupt (Derby, Southampton, Wigan,, Reading etc).
No more quangos for us all to fund thank you.
by Loafer » 16 Mar 2024 18:38
The Green ProgrammeleonThe Green Programme
A ‘regulator’!!!!
It’s such a bizarre response.
Just think about what you are saying.
Who pays for it (look out for the gravy train)
Who decides what they regulate and what they don’t?
And what does it mean - another layer of bureaucracy… more cost to fans ….
Be careful what you wish for.
The FCA and the Labour Government (in an attempt to beat the market-end boom and bust yawn yawn) and give some real power to the regulator by employing totally inexperienced graduates……managed such levels of ineptitude that they allowed record lending to those who couldn’t afford it after the sale of all our mutual companies (bribery by shareholding) and a resultant crash of the banks….
Whilst happily raking in the taxes during the lending spree - and then managing to overspend on that….
Hurray for regulation…...
We will be paying for it for years and years….
We (RFC) are in the crap - it will be resolved and we will move on….
Foreign owners; relying on offshore structures for financing should not be able to purchase clubs in UK.
Some of what has allegedly gone on at City is outrageous but they will probably get away with it all, If they don’t, they’ll be going out of business.
The current ‘regulators’ won’t allow it…..
Hurray for FFP….
You’re a fool
And you are probably a Socialist who can propagate two or more totally contradictory principles simultaneously and cannot make a reasoned case for anything - and instead, simply makes silly (or worse) insulting personal comments.
The most regulated markets are often the most corrupted, the most ineffective and the most expensive.
The Banks were regulated by a socialist government…. and that went really well…..
That answer is to penalise Clubs in real time - not retrospectively.
It’s the retrospective penalties and the chance of avoiding them that leads to owners taking every risk to get to the promised land - succeed and all is fine (Villa, Bournemouth etc) fail and you become a bankrupt (Derby, Southampton, Wigan,, Reading etc).
No more quangos for us all to fund thank you.
by From Despair To Where? » 16 Mar 2024 19:02
by NathStPaul » 16 Mar 2024 19:06
From Despair To Where? I wouldn't pay any attention to The Green Programme. He was singing Dai's praises when he gave Moore £35k a week and we spent £15m on 2 strikers days after coming out of a soft embargo. Apparently it showed ambition.
by leon » 16 Mar 2024 19:17
The Green ProgrammeleonThe Green Programme
A ‘regulator’!!!!
It’s such a bizarre response.
Just think about what you are saying.
Who pays for it (look out for the gravy train)
Who decides what they regulate and what they don’t?
And what does it mean - another layer of bureaucracy… more cost to fans ….
Be careful what you wish for.
The FCA and the Labour Government (in an attempt to beat the market-end boom and bust yawn yawn) and give some real power to the regulator by employing totally inexperienced graduates……managed such levels of ineptitude that they allowed record lending to those who couldn’t afford it after the sale of all our mutual companies (bribery by shareholding) and a resultant crash of the banks….
Whilst happily raking in the taxes during the lending spree - and then managing to overspend on that….
Hurray for regulation…...
We will be paying for it for years and years….
We (RFC) are in the crap - it will be resolved and we will move on….
Foreign owners; relying on offshore structures for financing should not be able to purchase clubs in UK.
Some of what has allegedly gone on at City is outrageous but they will probably get away with it all, If they don’t, they’ll be going out of business.
The current ‘regulators’ won’t allow it…..
Hurray for FFP….
You’re a fool
And you are probably a Socialist who can propagate two or more totally contradictory principles simultaneously and cannot make a reasoned case for anything - and instead, simply makes silly (or worse) insulting personal comments.
The most regulated markets are often the most corrupted, the most ineffective and the most expensive.
The Banks were regulated by a socialist government…. and that went really well…..
That answer is to penalise Clubs in real time - not retrospectively.
It’s the retrospective penalties and the chance of avoiding them that leads to owners taking every risk to get to the promised land - succeed and all is fine (Villa, Bournemouth etc) fail and you become a bankrupt (Derby, Southampton, Wigan,, Reading etc).
No more quangos for us all to fund thank you.
by Loafer » 16 Mar 2024 21:52
NathStPaulFrom Despair To Where? I wouldn't pay any attention to The Green Programme. He was singing Dai's praises when he gave Moore £35k a week and we spent £15m on 2 strikers days after coming out of a soft embargo. Apparently it showed ambition.
I'll get him added to the teamboard bellend spreadsheet.
by 72 bus » 16 Mar 2024 22:02
LoaferNathStPaulFrom Despair To Where? I wouldn't pay any attention to The Green Programme. He was singing Dai's praises when he gave Moore £35k a week and we spent £15m on 2 strikers days after coming out of a soft embargo. Apparently it showed ambition.
I'll get him added to the teamboard bellend spreadsheet.
Who else is in this spreadsheet?
Users browsing this forum: Armadillo Roadkill, Jammy Dodger, rocketredroyal, Who Moved The Goalposts? and 305 guests