CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

6094 posts
Cureton's Volley
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1633
Joined: 08 Jan 2013 23:58

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Cureton's Volley » 19 Mar 2024 17:47

I hope we get the Wilf's, they've been fantastic for the Vikes

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20299
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Undiscovered pyramid somewhere in Egypt

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Sutekh » 19 Mar 2024 18:07

Cureton's Volley I hope we get the Wilf's, they've been fantastic for the Vikes


WILF :?

Farnham Royal
Member
Posts: 17
Joined: 21 Oct 2005 13:42

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Farnham Royal » 19 Mar 2024 18:09

Who knows if the rumors about the Vikings owners are true? For what it is worth, what we do know is that in the NFL Players Association's official report card, the Vikings players give them very high grades (2nd out of 32 NFL teams). https://nflpa.com/minnesota-vikings-report-card-2024

And they were 1st in 2023

User avatar
Franchise FC
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11697
Joined: 22 May 2007 16:24
Location: Relocated to LA

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Franchise FC » 19 Mar 2024 18:53

Farnham Royal Who knows if the rumors about the Vikings owners are true? For what it is worth, what we do know is that in the NFL Players Association's official report card, the Vikings players give them very high grades (2nd out of 32 NFL teams). https://nflpa.com/minnesota-vikings-report-card-2024

And they were 1st in 2023

So getting worse :wink:

User avatar
St Pauli
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26428
Joined: 22 Sep 2006 14:17
Location: Vote Brogue for Mod!

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by St Pauli » 19 Mar 2024 19:18

Franchise FC
Greatwesternline
rabidbee Leaving aside that the bill will fall after Rishi's shock calling of a GE next week, how likely do you think this would get through Parliament anyway?


Yeh the biggest risk to this Bill is time. There are about 14 sitting weeks left till the November election.

But given the opposition support the Bill it will be plain sailing.

If an election happens before it is passed it falls entirely. And i doubt a new football regulator is going to be at the top of Labour's agenda for passing legislation when it comes in. When you've been out of power for 14 years you have more pressing demands on your legislative time.

When you’ve been in power for 14 years and got the country into such an awful mess I doubt a new football regulator should be anywhere near the top of the agenda


You say this but what could be more important?


Farnham Royal
Member
Posts: 17
Joined: 21 Oct 2005 13:42

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Farnham Royal » 19 Mar 2024 20:25

Franchise FC
Farnham Royal Who knows if the rumors about the Vikings owners are true? For what it is worth, what we do know is that in the NFL Players Association's official report card, the Vikings players give them very high grades (2nd out of 32 NFL teams). https://nflpa.com/minnesota-vikings-report-card-2024

And they were 1st in 2023

So getting worse :wink:


Yep, 2nd really sucks. ;)

The Green Programme
Member
Posts: 255
Joined: 27 Oct 2018 13:12

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by The Green Programme » 19 Mar 2024 22:29

Brum Royal Presumably with the (expected) Labour majority post-election this will help move things along quicker/have more positive backing from the MPs


Labour do love a quango or two…

They call it creating jobs…..

A regulator will just add to costs - and maintain the status quo - and create another layer of jobsworths justifying their existence and creating nothing.

Wherever a Club is, when the regulator begins - is where they will stay.

Football is a worldwide market.

A regulator would (unless it had worldwide powers) drive money away from UK.

Football should be run by football - not by quangos and foreign owners with dubious records.

EFL should just ratify transfers and players’ wage costs - for every Club, based on last years accounts; adding in any special factors such as promotion or relegation.

It’s not that hard if there is a will to do so.

A new quango is rarely the answer to anything.

Loafer
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12207
Joined: 30 Dec 2021 15:28

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Loafer » 19 Mar 2024 22:51

The Green Programme
Brum Royal Presumably with the (expected) Labour majority post-election this will help move things along quicker/have more positive backing from the MPs


Labour do love a quango or two…

They call it creating jobs…..

A regulator will just add to costs - and maintain the status quo - and create another layer of jobsworths justifying their existence and creating nothing.

Wherever a Club is, when the regulator begins - is where they will stay.

Football is a worldwide market.

A regulator would (unless it had worldwide powers) drive money away from UK.

Football should be run by football - not by quangos and foreign owners with dubious records.

EFL should just ratify transfers and players’ wage costs - for every Club, based on last years accounts; adding in any special factors such as promotion or relegation.

It’s not that hard if there is a will to do so.

A new quango is rarely the answer to anything.

If Labour get involved in football I'm boycotting all football and watching rugby and cricket from now on

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 42848
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 19 Mar 2024 22:53

The Green Programme
Brum Royal Presumably with the (expected) Labour majority post-election this will help move things along quicker/have more positive backing from the MPs


Labour do love a quango or two…

They call it creating jobs…..

A regulator will just add to costs - and maintain the status quo - and create another layer of jobsworths justifying their existence and creating nothing.

Wherever a Club is, when the regulator begins - is where they will stay.

Football is a worldwide market.

A regulator would (unless it had worldwide powers) drive money away from UK.

Football should be run by football - not by quangos and foreign owners with dubious records.

EFL should just ratify transfers and players’ wage costs - for every Club, based on last years accounts; adding in any special factors such as promotion or relegation.

It’s not that hard if there is a will to do so.

A new quango is rarely the answer to anything.

Bore off


User avatar
Armadillo Roadkill
Member
Posts: 911
Joined: 03 Nov 2007 19:47
Location: In a zone of great calm

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Armadillo Roadkill » 19 Mar 2024 22:59

The Green Programme
Brum Royal Presumably with the (expected) Labour majority post-election this will help move things along quicker/have more positive backing from the MPs


Labour do love a quango or two…

They call it creating jobs…..

A regulator will just add to costs - and maintain the status quo - and create another layer of jobsworths justifying their existence and creating nothing.

Wherever a Club is, when the regulator begins - is where they will stay.

Football is a worldwide market.

A regulator would (unless it had worldwide powers) drive money away from UK.

Football should be run by football - not by quangos and foreign owners with dubious records.

EFL should just ratify transfers and players’ wage costs - for every Club, based on last years accounts; adding in any special factors such as promotion or relegation.

It’s not that hard if there is a will to do so.

A new quango is rarely the answer to anything.


Yeah, because allowing football to be run on free market principles has been working brilliantly for decades now, hasn't it?

This free market bullshït is economically, philosophically and sociologically illiterate.

A centrally planned economy is too complex to ever be effective in all areas. Where there are low barriers to entry and the capacity to respond quickly to changes in customer behaviour then the market is efficient.

Football is not such a "product." A football club is not easily replaced. It is part of its community, it is part of a society's intangible culture, there is no economic or human advantage in allowing the current unregulated model.

The barriers to replacing a failing club with a new one are vast. The costs of a regulator are negligible given football's' turnover and contribution to GDP.

And karbota agrees with you. That alone should be sufficient evidence that you're bang out of order.

User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 31055
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by leon » 19 Mar 2024 23:01

Loafer
The Green Programme
Brum Royal Presumably with the (expected) Labour majority post-election this will help move things along quicker/have more positive backing from the MPs


Labour do love a quango or two…

They call it creating jobs…..

A regulator will just add to costs - and maintain the status quo - and create another layer of jobsworths justifying their existence and creating nothing.

Wherever a Club is, when the regulator begins - is where they will stay.

Football is a worldwide market.

A regulator would (unless it had worldwide powers) drive money away from UK.

Football should be run by football - not by quangos and foreign owners with dubious records.

EFL should just ratify transfers and players’ wage costs - for every Club, based on last years accounts; adding in any special factors such as promotion or relegation.

It’s not that hard if there is a will to do so.

A new quango is rarely the answer to anything.

If Labour get involved in football I'm boycotting all football and watching rugby and cricket from now on


Another benefit of a Labour government. When can I vote?

User avatar
SouthDownsRoyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11308
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 12:48

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by SouthDownsRoyal » 20 Mar 2024 00:16

blythspartan
WestYorksRoyal Earnshaw is the only one who can be trusted. You'd think the ITKs would have learned by now that Dai is unpredictable and whatever their contacts have heard, it means next to nothing.


The ITKs on Twitter are oxf*rd laughable. I have not seen most of them post anything before. Some now claiming there’ll be no news today, like we didn’t know that already. I must stop looking at it.


Very few, if any X users are ITK, they are either making stuff up or are spotty teenagers who are getting off on pretending to know stuff and watching people retweeting them.

User avatar
SouthDownsRoyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11308
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 12:48

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by SouthDownsRoyal » 20 Mar 2024 00:19

Snowflake Royal
The Green Programme
Brum Royal Presumably with the (expected) Labour majority post-election this will help move things along quicker/have more positive backing from the MPs


Labour do love a quango or two…

They call it creating jobs…..

A regulator will just add to costs - and maintain the status quo - and create another layer of jobsworths justifying their existence and creating nothing.

Wherever a Club is, when the regulator begins - is where they will stay.

Football is a worldwide market.

A regulator would (unless it had worldwide powers) drive money away from UK.

Football should be run by football - not by quangos and foreign owners with dubious records.

EFL should just ratify transfers and players’ wage costs - for every Club, based on last years accounts; adding in any special factors such as promotion or relegation.

It’s not that hard if there is a will to do so.

A new quango is rarely the answer to anything.

Bore off


LOL :mrgreen:


User avatar
From Despair To Where?
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24844
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: See me in m'pants and ting

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by From Despair To Where? » 20 Mar 2024 06:54

Far be it from me to suggest The Green Programme has always spouted gibberish but his love of Dai is evident. I think it's Pang's sleeper account.

The Green Programme
Our owners, having seen this, made sweeping changes last January and things have improved ever since.......

......we are moving forward again....



We finished 20th.

The Green Programme
So exciting......

Moore, Pele and Puskas...

All in Reading shirts ...



Nurse, the laudanum!!!!

The Green Programme Our owners have resisted the temptation to sell our best players and are ruthless and want success.


The Green Programme Instead of just accepting mediocrity, our owners are investing money, holding on to our best players and showing that they are ruthless.



The Green Programme Our owners have invested massively in the Club and have learned from their mistakes (buying expensive average players with little or no ambition, for inflated prices and eye watering contracts


We'd just signed Ejaria for £3.4m having just come out of an embargo.

The Green Programme Great signings; all of them, this summer.

And once again, our owners have done the business. Credit where it’s due.


Hoilett, Halilovic, Dann, Rahman, Deli Bashiru, Drinkwater. Great signings, all of them.

The Green Programme Great signing if we get him, (Andy Carroll)even coming off the bench. Awesome target man; almost unbeatable in the air in both boxes; and some aggression up front; we haven’t had that since Jason Roberts. And he can finish.
With Drinkwater and Dann and the earlier signings too; and the youngsters around him doing the leg work; this could be an exciting season ahead



I stopped after his first 40 posts.
Last edited by From Despair To Where? on 20 Mar 2024 07:19, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 42848
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 20 Mar 2024 07:19

Anyone who uses socialist as an insult is an imbecile.

Uses the Daily Mail trope of quango = bad (they haven’t been quangos for decades anyway) and all regulation is bad, despite the countless examples of no/weak/underfunded regulators lead to apalling behaviour and dreadful standards by business.

Basically just thick as pig shit.

blythspartan
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2416
Joined: 05 Jun 2012 20:50

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by blythspartan » 20 Mar 2024 07:21

According to Howe a deal is a long way off. Yet again we get our hopes up for nothing.

https://twitter.com/RFCLatest

User avatar
From Despair To Where?
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 24844
Joined: 19 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: See me in m'pants and ting

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by From Despair To Where? » 20 Mar 2024 07:23

Let's get rid of the police because society can self regulate.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6272
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 20 Mar 2024 07:27

blythspartan According to Howe a deal is a long way off. Yet again we get our hopes up for nothing.

https://twitter.com/RFCLatest

But exclusivity must therefore be close. It's only the first step and there is plenty of process to go through after this point. So this contravenes nothing James Earnshaw has reported, only the ITKs claiming "done deal". What a surprise.

There's still a route to exclusivity and bridging loan this week. And similarly, if this doesn't happen then Howe's timeline may not be achievable.

For context with WBA, their preferred bidder emerged in the middle of January and the deal was complete at the end of February. The Club won't be able to report who the preferred party until the EFL approves them, but media outlets will share it pretty widely.

Edit: I'd add exclusivity gives no guarantees, it's like an offer being accepted on a house. Last week Wycombe had exclusivity over our training ground. But it would still be a checkpoint to celebrate and much further than we've got before.
Last edited by WestYorksRoyal on 20 Mar 2024 07:38, edited 1 time in total.

blythspartan
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2416
Joined: 05 Jun 2012 20:50

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by blythspartan » 20 Mar 2024 07:34

Hopefully, I have copied the correct link to the recording.
https://twitter.com/BBCBerkshire

blythspartan
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2416
Joined: 05 Jun 2012 20:50

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by blythspartan » 20 Mar 2024 07:39

WestYorksRoyal
blythspartan According to Howe a deal is a long way off. Yet again we get our hopes up for nothing.

https://twitter.com/RFCLatest

But exclusivity must therefore be close. It's only the first step and there is plenty of process to go through after this point. So this contravenes nothing James Earnshaw has reported, only the ITKs claiming "done deal". What a surprise.

There's still a route to exclusivity and bridging loan this week. And similarly, if this doesn't happen then Howe's timeline may not be achievable.

For context with WBA, their preferred bidder emerged in the middle of January and the deal was complete at the end of February. The Club won't be able to report who the preferred party until the EFL approves them, but media outlets will share it pretty widely.


Is it definitely 6 to 8 weeks until completion or is he meaning exclusivity? At least all the ITK’s on twitter can oxf*rd off now.

6094 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 262 guests

It is currently 29 Nov 2024 18:37