Hound Massive well done to the commercial team btw if they’ve made up a 1m shortfall so quickly
Be interesting to see what’s been dreamed up
Heard last weekend a shirt sleeve sponsorship deal is definitely one of those.
by RG30 » 21 Mar 2024 14:12
Hound Massive well done to the commercial team btw if they’ve made up a 1m shortfall so quickly
Be interesting to see what’s been dreamed up
by WestYorksRoyal » 21 Mar 2024 14:15
RG30Hound Massive well done to the commercial team btw if they’ve made up a 1m shortfall so quickly
Be interesting to see what’s been dreamed up
Heard last weekend a shirt sleeve sponsorship deal is definitely one of those.
by Stranded » 21 Mar 2024 14:16
WestYorksRoyal John Percy update. Semi reliable but fell for Storey's bullshit.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/20 ... rs-offers/
If true, shortfall issues resolve for March. Exclusivity targeted by the end of the month (i.e., next week). Genevra are back.
Gotta be honest, I couldn't give a shit who owns us next season so long as it's not Dai Yongge. Will happily take Genevra.
by WestYorksRoyal » 21 Mar 2024 14:22
StrandedWestYorksRoyal John Percy update. Semi reliable but fell for Storey's bullshit.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/20 ... rs-offers/
If true, shortfall issues resolve for March. Exclusivity targeted by the end of the month (i.e., next week). Genevra are back.
Gotta be honest, I couldn't give a shit who owns us next season so long as it's not Dai Yongge. Will happily take Genevra.
As short term as it may be, I think we are mostly all on the same page - if whatever group comes in passes the low bar tests and then just keeps us ticking over and invests, wisely, in the team/club then fine. The alternative doesn't really bare thinking about.
by Stranded » 21 Mar 2024 14:36
WestYorksRoyalStrandedWestYorksRoyal John Percy update. Semi reliable but fell for Storey's bullshit.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/20 ... rs-offers/
If true, shortfall issues resolve for March. Exclusivity targeted by the end of the month (i.e., next week). Genevra are back.
Gotta be honest, I couldn't give a shit who owns us next season so long as it's not Dai Yongge. Will happily take Genevra.
As short term as it may be, I think we are mostly all on the same page - if whatever group comes in passes the low bar tests and then just keeps us ticking over and invests, wisely, in the team/club then fine. The alternative doesn't really bare thinking about.
If you speak to Wigan fans, Al Hammad started well there. Spoke about investing in youth, won promotion, appointed Maloney. Then the guy providing the money turned the tap off. Obviously he shares the blame, he agreed to front their operation and made himself chairman. But it doesn't guarantee he'll fail with us. And at least when it went tits up, they sold up quickly unlike Dai who continues to cling on.
The problem with all these private equity and hedge funds is knowing who is providing the money. I imagine the EFL checks take time compared to someone like Mike Ashley.
by WestYorksRoyal » 21 Mar 2024 14:39
StrandedWestYorksRoyalStranded
As short term as it may be, I think we are mostly all on the same page - if whatever group comes in passes the low bar tests and then just keeps us ticking over and invests, wisely, in the team/club then fine. The alternative doesn't really bare thinking about.
If you speak to Wigan fans, Al Hammad started well there. Spoke about investing in youth, won promotion, appointed Maloney. Then the guy providing the money turned the tap off. Obviously he shares the blame, he agreed to front their operation and made himself chairman. But it doesn't guarantee he'll fail with us. And at least when it went tits up, they sold up quickly unlike Dai who continues to cling on.
The problem with all these private equity and hedge funds is knowing who is providing the money. I imagine the EFL checks take time compared to someone like Mike Ashley.
I think though, Howe has put a step in place that means every bidder has to essentially pass the EFL Checks with him first before he puts them anywhere near the EFL - so we can hope (and it is only hope) that as soon as exclusivity is announced the actual checks may not be much more that reviewing the paperwork from Howe.
This is where having Howe involved is a bonus as he knows the EFL processes inside out.
by blythspartan » 21 Mar 2024 14:47
StrandedWestYorksRoyalStranded
As short term as it may be, I think we are mostly all on the same page - if whatever group comes in passes the low bar tests and then just keeps us ticking over and invests, wisely, in the team/club then fine. The alternative doesn't really bare thinking about.
If you speak to Wigan fans, Al Hammad started well there. Spoke about investing in youth, won promotion, appointed Maloney. Then the guy providing the money turned the tap off. Obviously he shares the blame, he agreed to front their operation and made himself chairman. But it doesn't guarantee he'll fail with us. And at least when it went tits up, they sold up quickly unlike Dai who continues to cling on.
The problem with all these private equity and hedge funds is knowing who is providing the money. I imagine the EFL checks take time compared to someone like Mike Ashley.
I think though, Howe has put a step in place that means every bidder has to essentially pass the EFL Checks with him first before he puts them anywhere near the EFL - so we can hope (and it is only hope) that as soon as exclusivity is announced the actual checks may not be much more that reviewing the paperwork from Howe.
This is where having Howe involved is a bonus as he knows the EFL processes inside out.
by WestYorksRoyal » 21 Mar 2024 14:54
by From Despair To Where? » 21 Mar 2024 15:06
Hound Massive well done to the commercial team btw if they’ve made up a 1m shortfall so quickly
Be interesting to see what’s been dreamed up
by Mid Sussex Royal » 21 Mar 2024 15:07
WestYorksRoyalHound Massive well done to the commercial team btw if they’ve made up a 1m shortfall so quickly
Be interesting to see what’s been dreamed up
SCL?
by blythspartan » 21 Mar 2024 15:16
Hound Massive well done to the commercial team btw if they’ve made up a 1m shortfall so quickly
Be interesting to see what’s been dreamed up
by WestYorksRoyal » 21 Mar 2024 15:25
blythspartanHound Massive well done to the commercial team btw if they’ve made up a 1m shortfall so quickly
Be interesting to see what’s been dreamed up
I reckon after spending a fair bit of money on tickets for mates, 3 home shirts and a lot of merchandise I don’t need, I have helped a little
by blythspartan » 21 Mar 2024 15:32
WestYorksRoyalblythspartanHound Massive well done to the commercial team btw if they’ve made up a 1m shortfall so quickly
Be interesting to see what’s been dreamed up
I reckon after spending a fair bit of money on tickets for mates, 3 home shirts and a lot of merchandise I don’t need, I have helped a little
I contributed to EPR's tickets deal and am in the draw for hospitality against Northampton. A drop in the ocean, but if 2000 fans or so did similar it would have made an impact.
by Snowflake Royal » 21 Mar 2024 15:51
HoundSnowflake RoyalHound
Problem is that there are so many ex-pros and relatively few other football jobs. I assume that 74 covers all age groups. Obviously this and the fact that these jobs are generally pretty enjoyable jobs means that the pay is pretty poor. Doubt the average academy coach is on much more than minimum wage
There are very few jobs in media that pay a decent whack
Whilst it’s probably right that an ex pro can find a football related job if they have other people skills (esp with younger people), it’s going to be a big step down wage wise from being a pro. Dunno about everyone else but if you told me in 4 years time I’m worth about 10% of what I am now I’d find that quite hard to come to terms with
I have faith you'd be ok with going from £500k a year to £50k a year.
150k to 15 less so. And that’s the area we’re talking about with us though
But even 500 to 50 is a huge change in lifestyle and expectation
by Pepe the Horseman » 21 Mar 2024 16:03
WestYorksRoyalblythspartanHound Massive well done to the commercial team btw if they’ve made up a 1m shortfall so quickly
Be interesting to see what’s been dreamed up
I reckon after spending a fair bit of money on tickets for mates, 3 home shirts and a lot of merchandise I don’t need, I have helped a little
I contributed to EPR's tickets deal and am in the draw for hospitality against Northampton. A drop in the ocean, but if 2000 fans or so did similar it would have made an impact.
by Franchise FC » 21 Mar 2024 16:04
WestYorksRoyalStrandedWestYorksRoyal If you speak to Wigan fans, Al Hammad started well there. Spoke about investing in youth, won promotion, appointed Maloney. Then the guy providing the money turned the tap off. Obviously he shares the blame, he agreed to front their operation and made himself chairman. But it doesn't guarantee he'll fail with us. And at least when it went tits up, they sold up quickly unlike Dai who continues to cling on.
The problem with all these private equity and hedge funds is knowing who is providing the money. I imagine the EFL checks take time compared to someone like Mike Ashley.
I think though, Howe has put a step in place that means every bidder has to essentially pass the EFL Checks with him first before he puts them anywhere near the EFL - so we can hope (and it is only hope) that as soon as exclusivity is announced the actual checks may not be much more that reviewing the paperwork from Howe.
This is where having Howe involved is a bonus as he knows the EFL processes inside out.
The EFL 2 years' funding requirement which I only learnt through Howe's interview makes me feel better that we'll have a couple of years stability at least. Plus the soft transfer embargo stops them spunking it all up the wall on vanity signings.
by Pepe the Horseman » 21 Mar 2024 16:05
Franchise FCWestYorksRoyalStranded
I think though, Howe has put a step in place that means every bidder has to essentially pass the EFL Checks with him first before he puts them anywhere near the EFL - so we can hope (and it is only hope) that as soon as exclusivity is announced the actual checks may not be much more that reviewing the paperwork from Howe.
This is where having Howe involved is a bonus as he knows the EFL processes inside out.
The EFL 2 years' funding requirement which I only learnt through Howe's interview makes me feel better that we'll have a couple of years stability at least. Plus the soft transfer embargo stops them spunking it all up the wall on vanity signings.
I'm afraid there's no way I believe that EVERY FL club has deposited two years running costs. That would likely tip almost every one of them into a cashflow crisis.
I assume this has been misinterpreted, somehow
by Franchise FC » 21 Mar 2024 16:07
Pepe the HorsemanFranchise FCWestYorksRoyal The EFL 2 years' funding requirement which I only learnt through Howe's interview makes me feel better that we'll have a couple of years stability at least. Plus the soft transfer embargo stops them spunking it all up the wall on vanity signings.
I'm afraid there's no way I believe that EVERY FL club has deposited two years running costs. That would likely tip almost every one of them into a cashflow crisis.
I assume this has been misinterpreted, somehow
Guessing it's proof of funds.
by WestYorksRoyal » 21 Mar 2024 16:12
Franchise FCWestYorksRoyalStranded
I think though, Howe has put a step in place that means every bidder has to essentially pass the EFL Checks with him first before he puts them anywhere near the EFL - so we can hope (and it is only hope) that as soon as exclusivity is announced the actual checks may not be much more that reviewing the paperwork from Howe.
This is where having Howe involved is a bonus as he knows the EFL processes inside out.
The EFL 2 years' funding requirement which I only learnt through Howe's interview makes me feel better that we'll have a couple of years stability at least. Plus the soft transfer embargo stops them spunking it all up the wall on vanity signings.
I'm afraid there's no way I believe that EVERY FL club has deposited two years running costs. That would likely tip almost every one of them into a cashflow crisis.
I assume this has been misinterpreted, somehow
by Franchise FC » 21 Mar 2024 16:14
WestYorksRoyalFranchise FCWestYorksRoyal The EFL 2 years' funding requirement which I only learnt through Howe's interview makes me feel better that we'll have a couple of years stability at least. Plus the soft transfer embargo stops them spunking it all up the wall on vanity signings.
I'm afraid there's no way I believe that EVERY FL club has deposited two years running costs. That would likely tip almost every one of them into a cashflow crisis.
I assume this has been misinterpreted, somehow
I think it may be a requirement on new owners? So yes, they are not requesting them from all 72 clubs. But Howe definitely implied it was more than just proof of funds.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 179 guests