CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

6852 posts
WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6525
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 22 Mar 2024 13:04

Snowflake Royal
SCIAG Dai basically made two mistakes, but they're both pretty bad.

1) Put too much of his own money into the squad rather than follow the profit and sustainability rules (which would probably have led to better recruitment), ultimately forcing us to work under EFL sanctions for years on end.

2) Ran out of liquidity.

Other than that, he helped fund the training ground, he kept ticket prices at far below the market rate, and he subsidised away travel.

It's been said to death but if he sells Moore and doesn't sign Aluko and Puscas (combined with generally more sensible recruitment and retention) then we wouldn't be in this mess. Although if Dai ran out of money when we were in the Championship we'd have been in a bigger mess so maybe that's not a great line of argument.

Those small changes only swing it to about £160m lost in 6 years, from £190m. Not enough to prevent the mess, just delay it

The fundamentals were so wrong that individual decisions or details would not have made a big difference. Just imagine if we beat Huddersfield at Wembley, it would have been the same mistakes on steroids. At least our issues now are of a size that the likes of SCL can help us out. What if we were dealing with a £5m monthly shortfall instead of £1m?

blythspartan
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2483
Joined: 05 Jun 2012 20:50

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by blythspartan » 22 Mar 2024 13:05

I think this is a good read about the current takeover situation.
https://t.co/yH2RDpcaXu

User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 18619
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Pepe the Horseman » 22 Mar 2024 14:57

Marc Bircham and friends out of the running according to itk Eddie.

User avatar
MouldyRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1835
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 16:19
Location: 54-46 that's my number

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by MouldyRoyal » 22 Mar 2024 15:10

Feels like we are down to the final option then

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6525
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 22 Mar 2024 15:33

So 2 parties left, one of which is reported to be Genevra. The other will either be Chiron Sports Group or the Minnesota Vikings guys.

Eddie reporting Sports.com walked because they didn't want to put in a deposit to cover the shortfall while Dai still had the power to pull the plug. Perfectly rational decision given who they're negotiating with.

Positive and negative spins available. The remaining parties must really want us to take such a risk covering the shortfall (good). They must be total idiots to want to buy a club in such a mess and dance to Dai's tune (bad).

Can't get away from what that Mike Gow guy said about the Chinese way of doing business. In the West we like to look at valuation models, balance sheets etc., and agree a fair price. It's subjective but ultimately people playing the same game. In Dai's culture, there is only one Reading FC and he owns it. If anyone else wants it, they have to pay what Dai thinks it's worth, and if they want it that badly he'll use that as leverage. It's no wonder the sale is so difficult.


User avatar
SouthDownsRoyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11523
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 12:48

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by SouthDownsRoyal » 22 Mar 2024 15:56

I 5hink we all know by know how this will almost certainly play out now.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6525
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 22 Mar 2024 16:00

SouthDownsRoyal I 5hink we all know by know how this will almost certainly play out now.

You just have to hope his rational self interest wins the day in the end. He gets nothing from the club if he doesn't sell. He's tried asset stripping and selling the training ground and it has failed. As difficult as he seems intent to make it, it really is in his best interests to sell.

User avatar
SouthDownsRoyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11523
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 12:48

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by SouthDownsRoyal » 22 Mar 2024 16:10

WestYorksRoyal
SouthDownsRoyal I 5hink we all know by know how this will almost certainly play out now.

You just have to hope his rational self interest wins the day in the end. He gets nothing from the club if he doesn't sell. He's tried asset stripping and selling the training ground and it has failed. As difficult as he seems intent to make it, it really is in his best interests to sell.


Agree with this but you’re rational, he isn’t, he has shown no intention of selling up to now just empty words

User avatar
Lower West
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4999
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:35
Location: Admiring Clem Morfuni at Work

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Lower West » 22 Mar 2024 16:13

WestYorksRoyal Positive and negative spins available. The remaining parties must really want us to take such a risk covering the shortfall (good). They must be total idiots to want to buy a club in such a mess and dance to Dai's tune (bad).



To fund the shortfall they'll either want some security (as did the Wycombe guy) or their offer will be materially lower to reflect the risk. There's no free lunches to be had. No shortage of football clubs to buy. With around 50% of EFL clubs technically insolvent and totally dependent upon the ongoing financial support of their owners. Football is in a sorry state.


User avatar
SouthDownsRoyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11523
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 12:48

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by SouthDownsRoyal » 22 Mar 2024 16:15

Pepe the Horseman Marc Bircham and friends out of the running according to nitk Eddie.


C4Y

User avatar
tmesis
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2860
Joined: 16 Aug 2013 20:26

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by tmesis » 22 Mar 2024 17:29

SouthDownsRoyal
WestYorksRoyal
SouthDownsRoyal I 5hink we all know by know how this will almost certainly play out now.

You just have to hope his rational self interest wins the day in the end. He gets nothing from the club if he doesn't sell. He's tried asset stripping and selling the training ground and it has failed. As difficult as he seems intent to make it, it really is in his best interests to sell.


Agree with this but you’re rational, he isn’t, he has shown no intention of selling up to now just empty words

As wildly irrational as he is, I can't see any logic at all to turning down a decent offer. With the now publicised restriction on Bearwood, selling that off becomes far more difficult, and the stadium can't be worth a fortune without Reading playing in it.

He could, in theory, just keep the club on life support to collect rent on the stadium, but it would take years to recoup what he could gain from a sale.

Yes, he could also be asking a high price, thinking he'd rather let us die than take an offer lower than what he considers acceptable, but is the price of his pride worth £30 million?

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6525
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 22 Mar 2024 17:34

If any private equity firm or hedge fund want an idea of the potential prize, Ipswich's owners just sold a 40% stake for £105m, valuing them at a whopping £262.5m. I think some is ringfenced for investment in infrastructure and staff as opposed to buying the shares. But it shows what returns can be generated if you turn around an underperforming club. Maybe Dai's price isn't so ridiculous.

User avatar
Franchise FC
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11698
Joined: 22 May 2007 16:24
Location: Relocated to LA

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Franchise FC » 22 Mar 2024 17:36

tmesis
SouthDownsRoyal
WestYorksRoyal You just have to hope his rational self interest wins the day in the end. He gets nothing from the club if he doesn't sell. He's tried asset stripping and selling the training ground and it has failed. As difficult as he seems intent to make it, it really is in his best interests to sell.


Agree with this but you’re rational, he isn’t, he has shown no intention of selling up to now just empty words

As wildly irrational as he is, I can't see any logic at all to turning down a decent offer. With the now publicised restriction on Bearwood, selling that off becomes far more difficult, and the stadium can't be worth a fortune without Reading playing in it.

He could, in theory, just keep the club on life support to collect rent on the stadium, but it would take years to recoup what he could gain from a sale.

Yes, he could also be asking a high price, thinking he'd rather let us die than take an offer lower than what he considers acceptable, but is the price of his pride worth £30 million?

As I see it, part of the problem is that it appears that whatever money he gets is going to be seized bu the Chinese government.
If that’s the case, and I appreciate it’s still a bit of guesswork, then he has no incentive to sell at all


WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6525
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by WestYorksRoyal » 22 Mar 2024 17:38

Franchise FC
tmesis
SouthDownsRoyal
Agree with this but you’re rational, he isn’t, he has shown no intention of selling up to now just empty words

As wildly irrational as he is, I can't see any logic at all to turning down a decent offer. With the now publicised restriction on Bearwood, selling that off becomes far more difficult, and the stadium can't be worth a fortune without Reading playing in it.

He could, in theory, just keep the club on life support to collect rent on the stadium, but it would take years to recoup what he could gain from a sale.

Yes, he could also be asking a high price, thinking he'd rather let us die than take an offer lower than what he considers acceptable, but is the price of his pride worth £30 million?

As I see it, part of the problem is that it appears that whatever money he gets is going to be seized bu the Chinese government.
If that’s the case, and I appreciate it’s still a bit of guesswork, then he has no incentive to sell at all

Very much guesswork. But if the Chinese government can seize his proceeds, surely they can also force him to sell an asset where it can be seen there is a market? I thought they can basically do anything they want tbh.

User avatar
Lower West
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4999
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:35
Location: Admiring Clem Morfuni at Work

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Lower West » 22 Mar 2024 17:51

Franchise FC
tmesis
SouthDownsRoyal
Agree with this but you’re rational, he isn’t, he has shown no intention of selling up to now just empty words

As wildly irrational as he is, I can't see any logic at all to turning down a decent offer. With the now publicised restriction on Bearwood, selling that off becomes far more difficult, and the stadium can't be worth a fortune without Reading playing in it.

He could, in theory, just keep the club on life support to collect rent on the stadium, but it would take years to recoup what he could gain from a sale.

Yes, he could also be asking a high price, thinking he'd rather let us die than take an offer lower than what he considers acceptable, but is the price of his pride worth £30 million?

As I see it, part of the problem is that it appears that whatever money he gets is going to be seized bu the Chinese government.
If that’s the case, and I appreciate it’s still a bit of guesswork, then he has no incentive to sell at all


Is Dai pulling the strings in China? I suspect not. There's many £ millions at stake in this transaction. Dai isn't the one losing out financially either. This money will go towards repaying bank borrowings.

blythspartan
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2483
Joined: 05 Jun 2012 20:50

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by blythspartan » 22 Mar 2024 17:53

I hope more than anything I am wrong, but I think we’ll get to 2 April with no news. The club will go silent apart from the usual tweets from admin and in the middle of April news will slowly filter out confirming that takeover talks have collapsed. I don’t trust Dai to sell the club.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 44358
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Snowflake Royal » 22 Mar 2024 18:31

SouthDownsRoyal
WestYorksRoyal
SouthDownsRoyal I 5hink we all know by know how this will almost certainly play out now.

You just have to hope his rational self interest wins the day in the end. He gets nothing from the club if he doesn't sell. He's tried asset stripping and selling the training ground and it has failed. As difficult as he seems intent to make it, it really is in his best interests to sell.


Agree with this but you’re rational, he isn’t, he has shown no intention of selling up to now just empty words

Yep. Been saying since about December that until a new owner is official we're on a ticking clock to oblivion with the deadline in June/July.

For all the noise. Nothing has changed. Except the amount of time left.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25604
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by Hound » 22 Mar 2024 20:40

Snowflake Royal
SouthDownsRoyal
WestYorksRoyal You just have to hope his rational self interest wins the day in the end. He gets nothing from the club if he doesn't sell. He's tried asset stripping and selling the training ground and it has failed. As difficult as he seems intent to make it, it really is in his best interests to sell.


Agree with this but you’re rational, he isn’t, he has shown no intention of selling up to now just empty words

Yep. Been saying since about December that until a new owner is official we're on a ticking clock to oblivion with the deadline in June/July.

For all the noise. Nothing has changed. Except the amount of time left.


Broadly agree which is why I’ve certainly not been getting over excited

One thing that may have changed is stripping out Bearwood and selling off looks a whole lot harder than he’d hoped. How much influence that will have - who knows.

SCIAG
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6506
Joined: 17 Jun 2008 17:43
Location: Liburd for England

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by SCIAG » 22 Mar 2024 21:56

Snowflake Royal
SCIAG Dai basically made two mistakes, but they're both pretty bad.

1) Put too much of his own money into the squad rather than follow the profit and sustainability rules (which would probably have led to better recruitment), ultimately forcing us to work under EFL sanctions for years on end.

2) Ran out of liquidity.

Other than that, he helped fund the training ground, he kept ticket prices at far below the market rate, and he subsidised away travel.

It's been said to death but if he sells Moore and doesn't sign Aluko and Puscas (combined with generally more sensible recruitment and retention) then we wouldn't be in this mess. Although if Dai ran out of money when we were in the Championship we'd have been in a bigger mess so maybe that's not a great line of argument.

Those small changes only swing it to about £160m lost in 6 years, from £190m. Not enough to prevent the mess, just delay it

HTH.

(But notwithstanding, we'd be much further from relegation if we had an extra £30m to pay wages and the taxman with right now)

User avatar
SouthDownsRoyal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11523
Joined: 08 Dec 2005 12:48

Re: TAKEOVER *NOT* CONFIMRED

by SouthDownsRoyal » 22 Mar 2024 23:02

SCIAG
Snowflake Royal
SCIAG Dai basically made two mistakes, but they're both pretty bad.

1) Put too much of his own money into the squad rather than follow the profit and sustainability rules (which would probably have led to better recruitment), ultimately forcing us to work under EFL sanctions for years on end.

2) Ran out of liquidity.

Other than that, he helped fund the training ground, he kept ticket prices at far below the market rate, and he subsidised away travel.

It's been said to death but if he sells Moore and doesn't sign Aluko and Puscas (combined with generally more sensible recruitment and retention) then we wouldn't be in this mess. Although if Dai ran out of money when we were in the Championship we'd have been in a bigger mess so maybe that's not a great line of argument.

Those small changes only swing it to about £160m lost in 6 years, from £190m. Not enough to prevent the mess, just delay it

HTH.

(But notwithstanding, we'd be much further from relegation if we had an extra £30m to pay wages and the taxman with right now)


Well, quite.

6852 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 134 guests

It is currently 17 Feb 2025 23:49