by Royals and Racers » 10 Apr 2024 20:08
by Crowbar6753 » 10 Apr 2024 20:23
Royals and Racers Are the Rovers fans saying what a good team we are ?
by From Despair To Where? » 10 Apr 2024 20:29
by Snowflake Royal » 10 Apr 2024 22:44
From Despair To Where? There were a few comments about how we look a decent team and a few on Bindon's clearance where his commitment and awareness impressed some but generally they're just pissed off about how they are sleepwalking and how clueless Matt Taylor is.
General consensus was that we won comfortably but they were bloody awful.
by Pepe the Horseman » 11 Apr 2024 03:37
by Sutekh » 11 Apr 2024 08:08
Snowflake RoyalFrom Despair To Where? There were a few comments about how we look a decent team and a few on Bindon's clearance where his commitment and awareness impressed some but generally they're just pissed off about how they are sleepwalking and how clueless Matt Taylor is.
General consensus was that we won comfortably but they were bloody awful.
Pretty fair. They looked good for about 15 minutes after HT but still didn’t get that close to scoring.
by Royals and Racers » 11 Aug 2024 21:54
by From Despair To Where? » 11 Aug 2024 22:45
They are one of the better sides we will play
A lot has been made of the pressing game, but I didn't see much of it yesterday. Reading were far better at it than we were. In general they just seemed like a team who knew each other better
That's a bit harsh on Reading, I wouldn't say they were a "lump it forward" team, certainly not for the first hour, they played good football and moved the ball well.
They're not a bad side at all.
credit to Reading their press was excellent in the first half and they executed well what teams will need to do when they come away to us
Reading have an excellent first eleven, but because they've signed no one this summer, they've no strength in depth. By the the time the reverse fixture comes around, they only need to be missing three of those 11 and they're in the mire. In many ways they've peaked in their first game and still couldn't win it.
by RG30 » 12 Aug 2024 07:41
by Brum Royal » 12 Aug 2024 09:40
by Brum Royal » 12 Aug 2024 09:44
RG30 This is an excellent thread on Twitter with a very balanced view:
https://x.com/Jam3s_34/status/1822587859049513015
by Orion1871 » 12 Aug 2024 11:44
by Berxwedan Zinar » 12 Aug 2024 13:34
by Snowflake Royal » 12 Aug 2024 20:38
Orion1871 Birmingham forum fans seem quite sensible. They might want to have a word with their fans on the league 1 subreddit, who have behaved like utter twats since their relegation.
by Snowflake Royal » 12 Aug 2024 20:39
Berxwedan Zinar Around the ground after the game the main sentiment I heard was "what a great game of football" (with a bit of "L1 will be harder than we thought" thrown in).
A fair few (justified) complaints about the back pass as well.
by Farnham Royal » 12 Aug 2024 22:04
Snowflake RoyalBerxwedan Zinar Around the ground after the game the main sentiment I heard was "what a great game of football" (with a bit of "L1 will be harder than we thought" thrown in).
A fair few (justified) complaints about the back pass as well.
What should that have been? Indirect freekick?
Surely not a penalty?
by Sutekh » 13 Aug 2024 07:33
Farnham RoyalSnowflake RoyalBerxwedan Zinar Around the ground after the game the main sentiment I heard was "what a great game of football" (with a bit of "L1 will be harder than we thought" thrown in).
A fair few (justified) complaints about the back pass as well.
What should that have been? Indirect freekick?
Surely not a penalty?
Yes, indirect free kick from where the ball was handled. We did get away with that. Dodgy decisions both ways.
by Dirk Gently » 13 Aug 2024 10:40
Farnham RoyalSnowflake RoyalBerxwedan Zinar Around the ground after the game the main sentiment I heard was "what a great game of football" (with a bit of "L1 will be harder than we thought" thrown in).
A fair few (justified) complaints about the back pass as well.
What should that have been? Indirect freekick?
Surely not a penalty?
Yes, indirect free kick from where the ball was handled. We did get away with that. Dodgy decisions both ways.
by WestYorksRoyal » 13 Aug 2024 10:55
Dirk GentlyFarnham RoyalSnowflake Royal What should that have been? Indirect freekick?
Surely not a penalty?
Yes, indirect free kick from where the ball was handled. We did get away with that. Dodgy decisions both ways.
A few years ago a ref told me that they absolutely hate trying to administer indirect free-kicks inside the box. There's so much pushing and shoving and so many players in such close proximity (often lined up along the goal-line and less than 10 yards from the ball) that it's a real nightmare. So they try to avoid giving them wherever possible because of the hassle they cause.
The referee was wrong not to give it, of course, but it's a bad law if it causes a situation where referees try not to award it.
by Snowflake Royal » 13 Aug 2024 11:54
WestYorksRoyalDirk GentlyFarnham Royal Yes, indirect free kick from where the ball was handled. We did get away with that. Dodgy decisions both ways.
A few years ago a ref told me that they absolutely hate trying to administer indirect free-kicks inside the box. There's so much pushing and shoving and so many players in such close proximity (often lined up along the goal-line and less than 10 yards from the ball) that it's a real nightmare. So they try to avoid giving them wherever possible because of the hassle they cause.
The referee was wrong not to give it, of course, but it's a bad law if it causes a situation where referees try not to award it.
Maybe they should give the attacking team a choice of where they want to take a FK anywhere outside the box. It would probably create a better chance, as indirect free kicks in the box are so close in that it's difficult to score. Normally just blast into the crowd of players and hope you get a kind ricochet.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 246 guests