by WestYorksRoyal » 21 Apr 2024 18:29
by NathStPaul » 21 Apr 2024 18:33
by John Madejski's Wallet » 21 Apr 2024 18:40
genome VAR has completely ruined the emotion of the game
by Franchise FC » 21 Apr 2024 18:40
WestYorksRoyal They're barely celebrating. They're embarrassed, as they should be. Saved by a 1mm VAR call.
City will smash them.
by Sutekh » 21 Apr 2024 18:40
Nottingham Forest tweeted
Three extremely poor decisions - three penalties not given - which we simply cannot accept.
We warned the PGMOL that the VAR is a Luton fan before the game but they didn’t change him. Our patience has been tested multiple times.
NFFC will now consider its options.
3:37 PM · Apr 21, 2024 · 21.7M Views
by BRO_BOT » 21 Apr 2024 18:43
John Madejski's Walletgenome VAR has completely ruined the emotion of the game
Pre VAR no-one would have complained at the goal standing. Gutted for Cov
by Ascotexgunner » 21 Apr 2024 18:44
by genome » 21 Apr 2024 18:48
John Madejski's Walletgenome VAR has completely ruined the emotion of the game
Pre VAR no-one would have complained at the goal standing. Gutted for Cov
by URZZZZ » 21 Apr 2024 18:49
genome VAR has completely ruined the emotion of the game
by BRO_BOT » 21 Apr 2024 18:53
URZZZZgenome VAR has completely ruined the emotion of the game
It’s dreadful. Always has been and always will be
But but but it eliminates controversy and helps us come to the right decision!
I’m convinced if that goal goes in at the other end and it’s not disallowed
by WestYorksRoyal » 21 Apr 2024 18:53
by BRO_BOT » 21 Apr 2024 18:53
Ascotexgunner I still can't see the offside bit? It still looks level to me.
by BRO_BOT » 21 Apr 2024 18:54
WestYorksRoyal Pre VAR, they used to talk about benefit of the doubt to the attacking team for tight calls, which this definitely was.
But similarly, linesmen are taught to leave their flags down now as VAR can check afterwards, so perhaps he would have flagged without VAR.
by WestYorksRoyal » 21 Apr 2024 18:56
BRO_BOTWestYorksRoyal Pre VAR, they used to talk about benefit of the doubt to the attacking team for tight calls, which this definitely was.
But similarly, linesmen are taught to leave their flags down now as VAR can check afterwards, so perhaps he would have flagged without VAR.
Of course he would as it was miles off!
by BRO_BOT » 21 Apr 2024 19:01
WestYorksRoyalBRO_BOTWestYorksRoyal Pre VAR, they used to talk about benefit of the doubt to the attacking team for tight calls, which this definitely was.
But similarly, linesmen are taught to leave their flags down now as VAR can check afterwards, so perhaps he would have flagged without VAR.
Of course he would as it was miles off!
What are you doing? Trolling and celebrating on a Reading FC forum after one of the most embarrassing SF wins of all time?
by BRO_BOT » 21 Apr 2024 19:02
by NathStPaul » 21 Apr 2024 19:02
by Snowflake Royal » 21 Apr 2024 19:03
Pepe the HorsemanThree extremely poor decisions - three penalties not given - which we simply cannot accept.
We warned the PGMOL that the VAR is a Luton fan before the game but they didn’t change him. Our patience has been tested multiple times.
NFFC will now consider its options.
Lol.
by NathStPaul » 21 Apr 2024 19:05
Snowflake RoyalPepe the HorsemanThree extremely poor decisions - three penalties not given - which we simply cannot accept.
We warned the PGMOL that the VAR is a Luton fan before the game but they didn’t change him. Our patience has been tested multiple times.
NFFC will now consider its options.
Lol.
Those options likely to be some fairly hot water, given they've basically accused the VAR ref of being corrupt.
by Winston Biscuit » 21 Apr 2024 19:08
Users browsing this forum: Snowflake Royal and 61 guests