by Brogue » 02 Sep 2024 22:00
by Snowflake Royal » 02 Sep 2024 22:35
by From Despair To Where? » 02 Sep 2024 22:57
by windermereROYAL » 02 Sep 2024 23:20
by Delboy » 03 Sep 2024 06:24
by WestYorksRoyal » 03 Sep 2024 07:16
windermereROYAL I wouldn`t think this is the work of Dai, why should he care what happens at the club now?, if the prospective new owners made the decision surely that can only be a good thing regarding the takeover by having a nice little staff turnover.
Regarding the legal action Bowen has broken football league rules, that`s a sackable offence in itself. he`ll need a decent lawyer to get a pay out on that.
by blythspartan » 03 Sep 2024 07:38
by traff » 03 Sep 2024 09:26
windermereROYAL I wouldn`t think this is the work of Dai, why should he care what happens at the club now?, if the prospective new owners made the decision surely that can only be a good thing regarding the takeover by having a nice little staff turnover.
Regarding the legal action Bowen has broken football league rules, that`s a sackable offence in itself. he`ll need a decent lawyer to get a pay out on that.
by The Cap » 03 Sep 2024 09:42
windermereROYAL I wouldn`t think this is the work of Dai, why should he care what happens at the club now?, if the prospective new owners made the decision surely that can only be a good thing regarding the takeover by having a nice little staff turnover.
Regarding the legal action Bowen has broken football league rules, that`s a sackable offence in itself. he`ll need a decent lawyer to get a pay out on that.
by andrew1957 » 03 Sep 2024 09:55
by Green » 03 Sep 2024 10:19
by Dirk Gently » 03 Sep 2024 10:37
windermereROYAL I wouldn`t think this is the work of Dai, why should he care what happens at the club now?, if the prospective new owners made the decision surely that can only be a good thing regarding the takeover by having a nice little staff turnover.
Regarding the legal action Bowen has broken football league rules, that`s a sackable offence in itself. he`ll need a decent lawyer to get a pay out on that.
by Green » 03 Sep 2024 10:38
by Green » 03 Sep 2024 10:39
Dirk GentlywindermereROYAL I wouldn`t think this is the work of Dai, why should he care what happens at the club now?, if the prospective new owners made the decision surely that can only be a good thing regarding the takeover by having a nice little staff turnover.
Regarding the legal action Bowen has broken football league rules, that`s a sackable offence in itself. he`ll need a decent lawyer to get a pay out on that.
So have Nigel Howe, Sue Hewett and Michael Gilkes. They weren't sacked.
Bowen will likely cite a lack of consistency from the club.
by Sutekh » 03 Sep 2024 11:09
Dirk GentlywindermereROYAL I wouldn`t think this is the work of Dai, why should he care what happens at the club now?, if the prospective new owners made the decision surely that can only be a good thing regarding the takeover by having a nice little staff turnover.
Regarding the legal action Bowen has broken football league rules, that`s a sackable offence in itself. he`ll need a decent lawyer to get a pay out on that.
So have Nigel Howe, Sue Hewett and Michael Gilkes. They weren't sacked.
Bowen will likely cite a lack of consistency from the club.
by On Strings » 03 Sep 2024 11:54
Dirk GentlywindermereROYAL I wouldn`t think this is the work of Dai, why should he care what happens at the club now?, if the prospective new owners made the decision surely that can only be a good thing regarding the takeover by having a nice little staff turnover.
Regarding the legal action Bowen has broken football league rules, that`s a sackable offence in itself. he`ll need a decent lawyer to get a pay out on that.
So have Nigel Howe, Sue Hewett and Michael Gilkes. They weren't sacked.
Bowen will likely cite a lack of consistency from the club.
by Clyde1998 » 03 Sep 2024 12:32
On StringsDirk GentlywindermereROYAL I wouldn`t think this is the work of Dai, why should he care what happens at the club now?, if the prospective new owners made the decision surely that can only be a good thing regarding the takeover by having a nice little staff turnover.
Regarding the legal action Bowen has broken football league rules, that`s a sackable offence in itself. he`ll need a decent lawyer to get a pay out on that.
So have Nigel Howe, Sue Hewett and Michael Gilkes. They weren't sacked.
Bowen will likely cite a lack of consistency from the club.
What has inconsistency got to do with breaking FA/EFL rules gambling on football? He hasn't got a leg to stand on.
by Snowflake Royal » 03 Sep 2024 12:41
by Brogue » 03 Sep 2024 12:54
Snowflake Royal You can have commited all sorts of gross misconduct, but if you have some sort of mitigating condition and your employer has failed in managing it, then you can still sue the arse off them.
Years ago this happened in a previous work place where a guy who was Bipolar stayed working whilst we all went to the Xmas meal, and he went out for his own lunch, got pissed and told customers on the phones he couldn’t help them because he was going on his annual Xmas shoplifting spree and hung up on them.
Clear gross misconduct. But his manager had done nothing to tackle his previous poor behaviour, or manage his Bipolar, so HR had to give him a settlement because they hadn't followed proper procedures.
Whether Bowen will get anywhere or not who knows. But it's likely he can point to a gambling addiction and claim the club ignored the problem, did nothing to help and so they can't just sack him like that.
by Snowflake Royal » 03 Sep 2024 12:57
BrogueSnowflake Royal You can have commited all sorts of gross misconduct, but if you have some sort of mitigating condition and your employer has failed in managing it, then you can still sue the arse off them.
Years ago this happened in a previous work place where a guy who was Bipolar stayed working whilst we all went to the Xmas meal, and he went out for his own lunch, got pissed and told customers on the phones he couldn’t help them because he was going on his annual Xmas shoplifting spree and hung up on them.
Clear gross misconduct. But his manager had done nothing to tackle his previous poor behaviour, or manage his Bipolar, so HR had to give him a settlement because they hadn't followed proper procedures.
Whether Bowen will get anywhere or not who knows. But it's likely he can point to a gambling addiction and claim the club ignored the problem, did nothing to help and so they can't just sack him like that.
How much did you get in the payout?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], donh99, Royals and Racers, WestYorksRoyal and 303 guests