MATCHWATCH : Bolton Wanderers (a)

133 posts
Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20388
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Undiscovered pyramid somewhere in Egypt

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bolton Wanderers (a)

by Sutekh » 22 Sep 2024 07:07

While Selles is not perfect he is doing the very best he can and has earned some time. Once all the mess has finally settled and the FL allow Reading to trade as a proper club again then we'll see how he properly stacks up. So he's going to be manager for at least another couple of years, unless he decides otherwise.

windermereROYAL
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8398
Joined: 19 Feb 2008 11:18

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bolton Wanderers (a)

by windermereROYAL » 22 Sep 2024 08:44

Sutekh While Selles is not perfect he is doing the very best he can and has earned some time. Once all the mess has finally settled and the FL allow Reading to trade as a proper club again then we'll see how he properly stacks up. So he's going to be manager for at least another couple of years, unless he decides otherwise.


So how much patience does he have to see out this whole sorry saga until the very end?

Mid Sussex Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3562
Joined: 02 Nov 2008 17:56

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bolton Wanderers (a)

by Mid Sussex Royal » 22 Sep 2024 09:33

Games like this will happen particularly away against a competent side with experienced pros.

Need to remember we sold 3 centre halves in Jan, and our experienced captain, who can play across the whole back line, is still out.

I feel our backline lacks experience/nous in certain situations; maybe games like this it may be time to give Dean another go?

Harry Bo
New Member
Posts: 3
Joined: 14 Sep 2023 09:29

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bolton Wanderers (a)

by Harry Bo » 22 Sep 2024 10:08

Well that was a bit of a turnaround for us yesterday guys and probably just what Wanderers needed to get back on track. If anything it was actually a really entertaining game and but for your generosity with the penalties could have been a completely different score line. I just hope that the off field shenanigans don’t spoil the season for you football wise and you can quickly resolve the ownership issues and get back to just talking about the sport we love. Anyway, good luck for the rest of the season and judging by results yesterday it could be a very open one so we can both make it back to the top with just a bit of luck and endeavour.

User avatar
morganb
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2626
Joined: 31 Jul 2017 12:30

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bolton Wanderers (a)

by morganb » 22 Sep 2024 10:08

Also our away form has been famously poor in recent seasons and we tend to lose to teams on a poor run of form - all the pointers were there for a loss


User avatar
Uke
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 23212
Joined: 17 Apr 2004 16:24
Location: Слава Україні! Героям слава! @UkeRFC

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bolton Wanderers (a)

by Uke » 22 Sep 2024 10:41

morganb Also our away form has been famously poor in recent seasons and we tend to lose to teams on a poor run of form - all the pointers were there for a loss


We need celebrity fans, it’s worked for Wrexham and Birmingham. Were they in the Reading end?


andrew1957
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4368
Joined: 29 Sep 2006 14:40
Location: Reading

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bolton Wanderers (a)

by andrew1957 » 22 Sep 2024 10:48

Every side we have played so far this season is likely to finish in the top half. Assuming we finish the season at all it will be defined by how we perform against the likes of Burton and Shrewsbury and not the top teams.

User avatar
Snowflake Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 43009
Joined: 20 Jun 2017 17:51

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bolton Wanderers (a)

by Snowflake Royal » 22 Sep 2024 10:51

windermereROYAL
Sutekh While Selles is not perfect he is doing the very best he can and has earned some time. Once all the mess has finally settled and the FL allow Reading to trade as a proper club again then we'll see how he properly stacks up. So he's going to be manager for at least another couple of years, unless he decides otherwise.


So how much patience does he have to see out this whole sorry saga until the very end?

As much patience as it takes for him to get a decent job offer.

Millsy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10132
Joined: 16 Jul 2004 18:36
Location: :)

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bolton Wanderers (a)

by Millsy » 22 Sep 2024 14:27

Orion1871
Snowflake Royal
Orion1871
Who's a big reason why we're 2 goals behind because the dozt twat couldn't just put his foot through the ball and clear it.

No, the reason we're two down is because Bindon and Mbengue pulled down strikers in the box unneccessarily.


And because Kelvin is a dozy twat who couldn't put his foot through the ball and clear it. "You defend from the front" as Coppell used to say about Kitson Kelvin is a constant liability when he's back in defensive areas.


Kelvin screwed up you're right.

But a) that's not the reason we lost as Ian says and b) unless you think he's a liability and likely to do the same freak crap clearance (not his job anyway - he's a striker) then ridiculous to take him off. When the game is crying out for more firepower to take off someone like him, who hit the crossbar, and replace him with a non-striker is almost Southgate levels of incompetence.


Clyde1998
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2847
Joined: 04 Mar 2010 16:27

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bolton Wanderers (a)

by Clyde1998 » 22 Sep 2024 14:44

We started off poorly and that's what cost us yesterday. From about the first minute, our passing was all over the place - recall Mbengue passing straight to an attacker standing within ten yards of him at least twice.

All the goals we conceded were poor; our defensive performance in general was the biggest concern about yesterday:
  1. We couldn't get the ball clear ahead of the free-kick for the first, despite having three or four opportunities to simply punt it up the pitch and reset. Would argue our attacking players were far too deep though - think Sam Smith was the most advanced player on about 25 yards. Good finish by the Bolton lad; Button did seem wrong footed by it (looked like he moved to his right before diving left) and was probably not expecting the shot to be towards that side of the goal.
  2. Mbengue grappling with the attacker in the box; attacker falls over and you're always risking giving away a penalty in that scenario. IIRC, Mbengue was already on a yellow card at that point and was lucky not to have got a second after it was given as a foul. The only vague argument as to why it shouldn't be a penalty (also see goal four) is because referees don't usually give those as penalties, but that's down to lack of enforcement rather than it not being a penalty under the rules.
  3. Ahead of the third goal, Dorsett was sitting far too high on the left and didn't work to cover for Bindon who'd had to come across to close the winger down. The ball was played into the space left, attacker turned away from Wing's tackle well and slotted under Button.
  4. The second penalty was for Bindon holding on to the attacker in the box. Attacker falls over (didn't look anywhere near enough contact to make him fall over) and a penalty is given, but again if you're putting your hands on the attacker in the box you're risking giving a penalty way.
  5. Free header from a corner. Completely left at the back post; not sure who was supposed to be dealing with him, but Wing ended up closest.
Positives (YMMV):
  1. We got two goals and maybe could've got more; Ehib hitting the bar at 4-2 is the most notable chance, but there were a number of times we had blocked shots in the box and the ball just wouldn't bounce the right way after getting on the end of crosses.
  2. We played well in spells - although that was when Bolton were two or three goals up. Felt like Bolton were never really out of second gear beyond the first twenty minutes.
  3. Abrefa looked better than Dorsett after he came on. Even if Dorsett is fit for next week, I'd probably have Abrefa starting ahead of him on that performance. I don't know if Dorsett is getting found out at left-back or whether he's simply on a bit of a bad run of form.
  4. Akande did cause a few issues when he came on and got balls into the box.
  5. Campbell's run into the box in the first half, going past about three players in the process. His effort at the end of it was incredibly tame and too close to the keeper though.
  6. We got the exact same result at Bolton as last season with a weaker team/squad.

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20388
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Undiscovered pyramid somewhere in Egypt

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bolton Wanderers (a)

by Sutekh » 22 Sep 2024 15:25

Clyde1998 We started off poorly and that's what cost us yesterday. From about the first minute, our passing was all over the place - recall Mbengue passing straight to an attacker standing within ten yards of him at least twice.

All the goals we conceded were poor; our defensive performance in general was the biggest concern about yesterday:
  1. We couldn't get the ball clear ahead of the free-kick for the first, despite having three or four opportunities to simply punt it up the pitch and reset. Would argue our attacking players were far too deep though - think Sam Smith was the most advanced player on about 25 yards. Good finish by the Bolton lad; Button did seem wrong footed by it (looked like he moved to his right before diving left) and was probably not expecting the shot to be towards that side of the goal.
  2. Mbengue grappling with the attacker in the box; attacker falls over and you're always risking giving away a penalty in that scenario. IIRC, Mbengue was already on a yellow card at that point and was lucky not to have got a second after it was given as a foul. The only vague argument as to why it shouldn't be a penalty (also see goal four) is because referees don't usually give those as penalties, but that's down to lack of enforcement rather than it not being a penalty under the rules.
  3. Ahead of the third goal, Dorsett was sitting far too high on the left and didn't work to cover for Bindon who'd had to come across to close the winger down. The ball was played into the space left, attacker turned away from Wing's tackle well and slotted under Button.
  4. The second penalty was for Bindon holding on to the attacker in the box. Attacker falls over (didn't look anywhere near enough contact to make him fall over) and a penalty is given, but again if you're putting your hands on the attacker in the box you're risking giving a penalty way.
  5. Free header from a corner. Completely left at the back post; not sure who was supposed to be dealing with him, but Wing ended up closest.
Positives (YMMV):
  1. We got two goals and maybe could've got more; Ehib hitting the bar at 4-2 is the most notable chance, but there were a number of times we had blocked shots in the box and the ball just wouldn't bounce the right way after getting on the end of crosses.
  2. We played well in spells - although that was when Bolton were two or three goals up. Felt like Bolton were never really out of second gear beyond the first twenty minutes.
  3. Abrefa looked better than Dorsett after he came on. Even if Dorsett is fit for next week, I'd probably have Abrefa starting ahead of him on that performance. I don't know if Dorsett is getting found out at left-back or whether he's simply on a bit of a bad run of form.
  4. Akande did cause a few issues when he came on and got balls into the box.
  5. Campbell's run into the box in the first half, going past about three players in the process. His effort at the end of it was incredibly tame and too close to the keeper though.
  6. We got the exact same result at Bolton as last season with a weaker team/squad.


Can't help but feel with the penalties that you've got attackers also grappling and behaving ungentlemanly, so perhaps defenders should look to fall over as well - or instead of - as long as they can hit the ground first they should get the free kick :lol:

Clyde1998
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2847
Joined: 04 Mar 2010 16:27

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bolton Wanderers (a)

by Clyde1998 » 22 Sep 2024 15:43

Sutekh Can't help but feel with the penalties that you've got attackers also grappling and behaving ungentlemanly, so perhaps defenders should look to fall over as well - or instead of - as long as they can hit the ground first they should get the free kick :lol:

I thought for a while we've been too 'nice' and honest. Most clubs have an element of 'tactical un-sportsmanship' in their game. Typically if both players fall over in those scenarios, it's a free-kick to the defending team.

User avatar
stealthpapes
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7815
Joined: 05 Jun 2013 13:25
Location: proverbs 26:11

Re: MATCHWATCH : Bolton Wanderers (a)

by stealthpapes » 22 Sep 2024 16:02

Clyde1998
Sutekh Can't help but feel with the penalties that you've got attackers also grappling and behaving ungentlemanly, so perhaps defenders should look to fall over as well - or instead of - as long as they can hit the ground first they should get the free kick :lol:

I thought for a while we've been too 'nice' and honest. Most clubs have an element of 'tactical un-sportsmanship' in their game. Typically if both players fall over in those scenarios, it's a free-kick to the defending team.


Strong tendency to appeal to ref and maybe not quite play to the whistle. Last game I went to was Wrexham and their third goal started when two similar decisions didn't go our way and we had some players not reacting and others out of position. Last season, it was pretty endemic, even in the better games that I saw (i.e. post-Christmas).

The turd cherry on top of the icing was Carroll at Port Vale fwiw.


133 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Crowbar6753, Mr Angry, rightroyalkneesup2, Royals and Racers, WestYorksRoyal and 357 guests

It is currently 04 Dec 2024 19:47