CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

5987 posts
User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 18235
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Pepe the Horseman » 10 Oct 2024 15:12

The EFL has not been told the identity of the new buyer


Errr.

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20050
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Undiscovered pyramid somewhere in Egypt

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Sutekh » 10 Oct 2024 15:14

If Haitong do seize the ground in lieu of payment from Dai then they'll simply look to sell it but the issue will always be how much rent they'll fleece the club for in the meantime.

Can't see any way a prospective buyer going to pay Dai, say, £25m while having to fork out a further £1.5m in rent per season (or £55m for the stadium).

User avatar
Armadillo Roadkill
Member
Posts: 899
Joined: 03 Nov 2007 19:47
Location: In a zone of great calm

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Armadillo Roadkill » 10 Oct 2024 15:16

Sutekh If Haitong do seize the ground in lieu of payment from Dai then they'll simply look to sell it but the issue will always be how much rent they'll fleece the club for in the meantime.

Can't see any way a prospective buyer going to pay Dai, say, £25m and then fork out a further £1.5m in rent per season (or £55m for the stadium).


If the bank seizes the stadium, then they can only sell it on for its market value, which cannot be £55 million. Or they can hang onto it and watch it degrade over time, but that makes no sense.

So the bank needs to co-ordinate the sale of the stadium with the sale of the club if they're to get any money back.

Hound
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25241
Joined: 27 Sep 2016 22:16
Location: Simpleton

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Hound » 10 Oct 2024 15:20

Armadillo Roadkill The club's not worth much without the stadium.

The stadium's not worth much without a viable tenant, and RFC is the only realistic one.

If I've understood all of the machinations, this appears to be the only ground for hope.

It also kicks the "reliable source" that put the blame on Couhig's last minute bargaining into touch.


Maybe that’s why he dropped it he offer to £8m?

User avatar
PieEater
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6539
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 15:42
Location: Comfortably numb

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by PieEater » 10 Oct 2024 15:24

Can someone explain how an overseas company can have a charge on the stadium, a UK asset? Is there some place in the UK that registers these charges, otherwise how would any buyer know how many other companies in the world that have loaned Dai money have also got charges on the stadium.

Do BVI courts have any juristiction here anyway? Could a buyer just ignore their decision as long as they get the ownership changed.


User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6682
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Wycombe Royal » 10 Oct 2024 15:28

PieEater Can someone explain how an overseas company can have a charge on the stadium, a UK asset? Is there some place in the UK that registers these charges, otherwise how would any buyer know how many other companies in the world that have loaned Dai money have also got charges on the stadium.

Do BVI courts have any juristiction here anyway? Could a buyer just ignore their decision as long as they get the ownership changed.

I was wondering the same. Surely this charge would need to be registered with Companies House?

South Coast Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6371
Joined: 16 Jan 2020 17:29

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by South Coast Royal » 10 Oct 2024 15:37

Wycombe Royal
PieEater Can someone explain how an overseas company can have a charge on the stadium, a UK asset? Is there some place in the UK that registers these charges, otherwise how would any buyer know how many other companies in the world that have loaned Dai money have also got charges on the stadium.

Do BVI courts have any juristiction here anyway? Could a buyer just ignore their decision as long as they get the ownership changed.

I was wondering the same. Surely this charge would need to be registered with Companies House?


I thought that overseas companies didn't have to register such charges-I may be wrong.

Crusader Royal
Member
Posts: 369
Joined: 24 Dec 2023 14:07

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Crusader Royal » 10 Oct 2024 15:52

Sutekh If Haitong do seize the ground in lieu of payment from Dai then they'll simply look to sell it but the issue will always be how much rent they'll fleece the club for in the meantime.

Can't see any way a prospective buyer going to pay Dai, say, £25m while having to fork out a further £1.5m in rent per season (or £55m for the stadium).


If the club has a contract to lease the stadium at a set rate surely it would be illegal for a new owner to increase that rate until a new agreement was due, unless there were terms in the lease allowing rent rises at any point. Most leases included the provision for rents to be reviewed at specific points (every 5 years on a 25 year lease for example).
Of course as the original lease is between 2 Dai companies there may not even be a proper contract.

User avatar
Armadillo Roadkill
Member
Posts: 899
Joined: 03 Nov 2007 19:47
Location: In a zone of great calm

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Armadillo Roadkill » 10 Oct 2024 16:00

Crusader Royal
Sutekh If Haitong do seize the ground in lieu of payment from Dai then they'll simply look to sell it but the issue will always be how much rent they'll fleece the club for in the meantime.

Can't see any way a prospective buyer going to pay Dai, say, £25m while having to fork out a further £1.5m in rent per season (or £55m for the stadium).


If the club has a contract to lease the stadium at a set rate surely it would be illegal for a new owner to increase that rate until a new agreement was due, unless there were terms in the lease allowing rent rises at any point. Most leases included the provision for rents to be reviewed at specific points (every 5 years on a 25 year lease for example).
Of course as the original lease is between 2 Dai companies there may not even be a proper contract.


You'd think a bank in China wouldn't want to start running a property management company in the UK, unless they already have similar assets. Selling would be the better option, and the only viable buyer I can see is a football club. Demolition and redevelopment is probably not a good option either.

As to just ignoring any ruling of a court in the BVI - not honouring international law would set a precedent that would spook foreign investors into the UK. The billionaires that hide their cash tax fee in such places would be unlikely to let any government put their scams at risk by undermining the legal agreements they depend upon.


katweslowski
Member
Posts: 190
Joined: 04 Jun 2023 05:04

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by katweslowski » 10 Oct 2024 16:02

Reading Borough Council made the stadium a community asset. I've no idea if this means anything legally, or whether it's just a title.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-b ... e%20owners.

katweslowski
Member
Posts: 190
Joined: 04 Jun 2023 05:04

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by katweslowski » 10 Oct 2024 16:05

One of the most frustrating things about all of this is that the club won't address these rumours or issues. I understand they can't respond to every idiot on Twitter. But when you have something spreading and rumours coming from all sorts of places, it would be refreshing to have the club give some clarity.

To be honest, they should be doing this anyway ffs, not in response.

E.g.

"Couhig deal fell through - soz about that. Also to tell you the stadium is subject to a loan by Dai and could be someting which the Chinese Bank could take control of in order to re-pay the debt." ...... plus extra info about how they're handling it all

Sanguine
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26200
Joined: 27 Feb 2013 14:36

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Sanguine » 10 Oct 2024 16:06

katweslowski Reading Borough Council made the stadium a community asset. I've no idea if this means anything legally, or whether it's just a title.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-b ... e%20owners.


When this was announced I thought this meant that it could only be used for football, i.e. it was stop the ground being sold off separately.

Greatwesternline
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6535
Joined: 09 Apr 2008 14:36

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Greatwesternline » 10 Oct 2024 16:20

Wycombe Royal
PieEater Can someone explain how an overseas company can have a charge on the stadium, a UK asset? Is there some place in the UK that registers these charges, otherwise how would any buyer know how many other companies in the world that have loaned Dai money have also got charges on the stadium.

Do BVI courts have any juristiction here anyway? Could a buyer just ignore their decision as long as they get the ownership changed.

I was wondering the same. Surely this charge would need to be registered with Companies House?


You register charges against properties at the Land Registry. Someone who can be bothered could buy the title deeds report for the Mad Stad and have a look. it'd only be £1.50


Mid Sussex Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3490
Joined: 02 Nov 2008 17:56

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Mid Sussex Royal » 10 Oct 2024 16:21

Do loans to overseas banks secured on UK assets appear on the charges register at the land registry?

Earnshaw reckons Couhig was aware of this at outset and new prospective owner also is....

Clyde1998
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2594
Joined: 04 Mar 2010 16:27

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Clyde1998 » 10 Oct 2024 16:32

Armadillo Roadkill The club's not worth much without the stadium.

The stadium's not worth much without a viable tenant, and RFC is the only realistic one.

If I've understood all of the machinations, this appears to be the only ground for hope.

It also kicks the "reliable source" that put the blame on Couhig's last minute bargaining into touch.

The club without the stadium is probably worth more than the stadium without the club. In fact, the stadium is probably worthless (at best) without the club.

As you've said, there's no viable team to become a tenant at the stadium without us playing there. Reading Borough Council are never going to approve of any development that demolishes the stadium and the car park is already owned separately.

The club at the very least could temporarily play somewhere else - most likely Wycombe. Absolutely far from ideal, but would allow the club to continue operating whilst a more permanent solution is found.

Would give the perspective owner some sort of negotiating leverage over the Chinese bank - otherwise they've simply got a worthless asset on the books, which they can't generate any revenue from.

royalgent
Member
Posts: 8
Joined: 04 Sep 2012 23:32

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by royalgent » 10 Oct 2024 16:44

South Coast Royal
Wycombe Royal
PieEater Can someone explain how an overseas company can have a charge on the stadium, a UK asset? Is there some place in the UK that registers these charges, otherwise how would any buyer know how many other companies in the world that have loaned Dai money have also got charges on the stadium.

Do BVI courts have any juristiction here anyway? Could a buyer just ignore their decision as long as they get the ownership changed.

I was wondering the same. Surely this charge would need to be registered with Companies House?


I thought that overseas companies didn't have to register such charges-I may be wrong.


It seems to me there’s a bit of a misleading line in this story - BVI stop notices apply to the sale of shares in BVI Companies, not assets.

Presumably the stadium is held via a BVI holding company - and the stop notice is to stop the transfer of shares in that company.

Crusader Royal
Member
Posts: 369
Joined: 24 Dec 2023 14:07

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Crusader Royal » 10 Oct 2024 17:02

Sanguine
katweslowski Reading Borough Council made the stadium a community asset. I've no idea if this means anything legally, or whether it's just a title.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-b ... e%20owners.


When this was announced I thought this meant that it could only be used for football, i.e. it was stop the ground being sold off separately.


It means very little.
The owner has to give interested community groups (essentially STAR) notice of sale and time to prepare a bid. The bid doesn’t have to be accepted and once the time period has elapsed the sale to others can go ahead.
Use of the stadium would be down to the local planning authority.
It’s essentially a token gesture.

Crusader Royal
Member
Posts: 369
Joined: 24 Dec 2023 14:07

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Crusader Royal » 10 Oct 2024 17:04

.
Last edited by Crusader Royal on 10 Oct 2024 17:05, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Armadillo Roadkill
Member
Posts: 899
Joined: 03 Nov 2007 19:47
Location: In a zone of great calm

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by Armadillo Roadkill » 10 Oct 2024 17:04

royalgent
South Coast Royal
Wycombe Royal I was wondering the same. Surely this charge would need to be registered with Companies House?


I thought that overseas companies didn't have to register such charges-I may be wrong.


It seems to me there’s a bit of a misleading line in this story - BVI stop notices apply to the sale of shares in BVI Companies, not assets.

Presumably the stadium is held via a BVI holding company - and the stop notice is to stop the transfer of shares in that company.


I guess these must be the complicated ownership structure across multiple legal jurisdictions we were told about.

WestYorksRoyal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6214
Joined: 15 Apr 2019 19:16

Re: CONFRIMED: Latest rumours Confrimed as Unconfrimed

by WestYorksRoyal » 10 Oct 2024 17:07

I don't know what to make of it all, and Earnshaw has rebutted some points in the Guardian article (the EFL do know who the new potential buyer is).

If a bank are involved, presumably they will act rationally. The club is worth less without the stadium than with. The stadium is literally worthless without the club. Last year's protection didn't add much, but it's in the covenant that it is a stadium used to host sport. Who else would use it other than Reading FC?

I don't see the logic over a bank blocking the sale and holding on to a stadium with no use. Even £2m a year rent barely touches the sides compared to Dai handing them £25m odd sales proceeds now.

It's clearly all murky, but logic dictates this should be a complication but not a deal breaker. Which is what the Chronicle are now reporting.

5987 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Orion1871 and 249 guests

It is currently 01 Nov 2024 15:30