by Pepe the Horseman » 21 Dec 2024 13:27
by Armadillo Roadkill » 21 Dec 2024 13:27
by Snowflake Royal » 21 Dec 2024 13:28
Armadillo Roadkill Two very poor refereeing decisions.
You're supposed to decide on what happens, not on some unfounded prejudice against a player. Smith was clearly brought down. Why would he dive if he's through on goal?
Holzman should have got a yellow. There was no intent to foul, so I don't see how it can be a red.
As if it wasn't already hard enough...
by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 21 Dec 2024 13:29
Armadillo Roadkill Two very poor refereeing decisions.
You're supposed to decide on what happens, not on some unfounded prejudice against a player. Smith was clearly brought down. Why would he dive if he's through on goal?
Holzman should have got a yellow. There was no intent to foul, so I don't see how it can be a red.
As if it wasn't already hard enough...
by morganb » 21 Dec 2024 13:33
by Hound » 21 Dec 2024 13:36
Snowflake Royal The difference between the two incidents is the Lincoln player stays on his feet and goes in to Smith's upper body with a shoulder, giving the ref the chance to decide it's shoulder to shoulder (it wasn't) and a dive (it wasn't). Made all the easier because Smith goesover easy all the time and pisses refs off.
Compared to Holzman who goes to ground from behind taking out the Lincoln player's legs. Nailed on red card.
One gives the ref the option to bottle it the other doesn't
by Snowflake Royal » 21 Dec 2024 13:37
by Hound » 21 Dec 2024 13:37
Snowflake RoyalArmadillo Roadkill Two very poor refereeing decisions.
You're supposed to decide on what happens, not on some unfounded prejudice against a player. Smith was clearly brought down. Why would he dive if he's through on goal?
Holzman should have got a yellow. There was no intent to foul, so I don't see how it can be a red.
As if it wasn't already hard enough...
It's a clear as day red card. He's denied a clear goalscoring chance.
by Snowflake Royal » 21 Dec 2024 13:38
HoundSnowflake RoyalArmadillo Roadkill Two very poor refereeing decisions.
You're supposed to decide on what happens, not on some unfounded prejudice against a player. Smith was clearly brought down. Why would he dive if he's through on goal?
Holzman should have got a yellow. There was no intent to foul, so I don't see how it can be a red.
As if it wasn't already hard enough...
It's a clear as day red card. He's denied a clear goalscoring chance.
I’m not convinced there was contact but equally no real complaints on it as a decision on its own
by Hound » 21 Dec 2024 13:38
Snowflake Royal That's right Sam, you keep arguing with the ref and pissing him off, that'll help.
by Hound » 21 Dec 2024 13:39
Snowflake RoyalHoundSnowflake Royal It's a clear as day red card. He's denied a clear goalscoring chance.
I’m not convinced there was contact but equally no real complaints on it as a decision on its own
Definitely contact
by Sutekh » 21 Dec 2024 13:40
by Snowflake Royal » 21 Dec 2024 13:43
by Sutekh » 21 Dec 2024 13:45
Snowflake Royal That's right Sam, you keep arguing with the ref and pissing him off, that'll help.
by Snowflake Royal » 21 Dec 2024 13:45
SutekhSnowflake Royal That's right Sam, you keep arguing with the ref and pissing him off, that'll help.
Ben House has spent much of the game doing exactly the same thing.
by Snowflake Royal » 21 Dec 2024 13:48
by Pepe the Horseman » 21 Dec 2024 13:48
by Pepe the Horseman » 21 Dec 2024 13:50
by Snowflake Royal » 21 Dec 2024 13:50
by Ascotexgunner » 21 Dec 2024 13:50
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Snowflake Royal, WestYorksRoyal and 86 guests