by Drew_3 » 19 Jul 2006 13:04
by Hatt-rick » 19 Jul 2006 13:07
Dangerous Is it just me or does the front of it look false, there's just something not right about it, I can't put my finger on it.
by Greenwich Royal » 19 Jul 2006 13:10
Don Finch I like it, a bit different, stripes down the arms will look better on short sleeves too I reckon. As long as they don't have that print - copy - scan - fax shoite down the back I'll be buying it.
by shadesrwrf » 19 Jul 2006 13:12
SWLR Re all the negative comments - I seem to recall similar outbursts last year (sleeves, tone of blue, blue shorts etc..). They've had a go at addressing the first two points, but the off-set style is obviously too trendy/ challenging for the average inhabitant of this site.
£5 discount is at least a nodd to the fact this is the third shirt in 3 years.
by Dangerous » 19 Jul 2006 13:17
Hatt-rickDangerous Is it just me or does the front of it look false, there's just something not right about it, I can't put my finger on it.
Your just pissed off you'll have to change your avatar...( you and many others actually)
I like it though, i like the amount of white on the arms and i like the back
by RoyalBlue » 19 Jul 2006 13:18
by SWLR » 19 Jul 2006 13:19
shadesrwrfSWLR Re all the negative comments - I seem to recall similar outbursts last year (sleeves, tone of blue, blue shorts etc..). They've had a go at addressing the first two points, but the off-set style is obviously too trendy/ challenging for the average inhabitant of this site.
£5 discount is at least a nodd to the fact this is the third shirt in 3 years.
There's nothing "trendy" about it. It's just a mess.
by Maguire » 19 Jul 2006 13:21
SWLRshadesrwrfSWLR Re all the negative comments - I seem to recall similar outbursts last year (sleeves, tone of blue, blue shorts etc..). They've had a go at addressing the first two points, but the off-set style is obviously too trendy/ challenging for the average inhabitant of this site.
£5 discount is at least a nodd to the fact this is the third shirt in 3 years.
There's nothing "trendy" about it. It's just a mess.
So they won't be stocking it in Austen Reed for you.
by Platypuss » 19 Jul 2006 13:23
SWLR Re all the negative comments - I seem to recall similar outbursts last year (sleeves, tone of blue, blue shorts etc..). They've had a go at addressing the first two points, but the off-set style is obviously too trendy/ challenging for the average inhabitant of this site.
.
by scutterbucket » 19 Jul 2006 13:27
by Royal Rother » 19 Jul 2006 13:29
by scutterbucket » 19 Jul 2006 13:30
Royal Rother Every season there are more moaning minnies than happy campers when the new kit comes out, even though it's generally pretty much the same as every other year.
It's really no big deal. Get a life guys!
by mathematically_safe » 19 Jul 2006 13:40
by Maguire » 19 Jul 2006 13:41
by Nick Shorey my Lord! » 19 Jul 2006 13:41
by Winchester Royal » 19 Jul 2006 13:46
Nick Shorey my Lord!
Someone get Adidas in and sort it out.
by Farnborough Royal » 19 Jul 2006 13:52
by Top Flight » 19 Jul 2006 13:57
by Einstein agogo » 19 Jul 2006 14:05
by Royalee » 19 Jul 2006 14:06
Newman was Waiting Really like it..does look a bit like Ipswich from the back.. but I think Puma have done well.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests