by Boston Royal »
04 Aug 2006 00:16
Top Flight I would have thought that most fans are intelligent enough to realise that we are going into the toughest league in the world where the quality gap between divisions has got to be the widest on earth......
I don't think RFC fans will be negative if we start losing games...
If you look at similar clubs who have been promoted with similar expectations as ourselves they certainly weren't complaining when they were struggling. I'm talking about the likes of Barnsley, Palace and Norwich in recent years, Watford etc.
I would hope that RFC fans don't have their heads stuck so far up their jacksies that the expectation is to achieve Europe or comfortably stay up.
We got a massive battle on next season and we have a high chance of getting relegated again. According to the bookies the third highest chance of going down! I'm realistic about what we can achieve. For me, survival = success.
Relegation, I can live with. I've seen relegations in the past and I will see them again. Thats football!
I very much liked OOTM's original post, but see TF's side. I agree with TF that, if we looked at this rationally, there's a huge gap in quality, fans should have low expectations and expect defeats; therefore, they shouldn't be surprised when we lose and turn against our team. But fans are far, far from rational. I'm afraid "I don't think RFC fans will be negative if we start losing games" seems like wishful thinking - just look at how we've reacted in the past.
TF makes a good point about Elm Park, but I think our good home record came from the cheering encouraging players, not booing whipping them into shape. Creative players in particular might fear doing something inventive if they'll get booed.
Of course, complete blind optimism can be just as destructive as pessimism (had the fans never turned against Bullivant, he might not have resigned), so fans should (and have the right to) be critical if we're significantly underperforming expectations. No manager or player should live purely on past glories, and /if/ things go disastrously next season, I'm sure Coppell will be one of the first to acknowledge a change is in order (something that Ferguson should have done years ago).
But I think OOTM's point is that our expectations are systematically too high. So if we end up W3 D1 L6 after 10 games, that's on par with / exceeding expectations. The danger is fans expect W7 D2 L1 and start getting on the players' backs.