Vidukas onside goal

User avatar
poohs pure
Member
Posts: 351
Joined: 10 May 2004 22:48
Location: berks

by poohs pure » 21 Aug 2006 14:38

poohs pure
Wycombe Royal
poohs pure i believe i may have just gotcha wycombe my old mucker. anyone else spot the deliberate attempt to hook wycombe with the old 8 yard line gag :-D hahahahaha

If you say so :roll: . You mean there isn't really an 8 yard line?


no point trying to wriggle out of it now mr 8 yard pony tailer


just spotted some suspect editing by WR. he isnt to be trusted

User avatar
Muskrat
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1254
Joined: 28 Apr 2004 13:38
Location: In my bunker

by Muskrat » 21 Aug 2006 19:59

Trigger


That's very good, but what position was he in when the Boro player actually played the ball?

In that picture the ball hasn't left his boot has it? He was offside if you ask me and the linesman was correct. Southgate, jumping around his technical aera and punching the air because he thought his team had scored however, was not. Rather amusingly... :)

User avatar
OzBiscuit2004
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 198
Joined: 16 Apr 2004 00:54
Location: Lillee ct Dilley b Milli Vanilli

by OzBiscuit2004 » 21 Aug 2006 20:12

Muskrat
Trigger


That's very good, but what position was he in when the Boro player actually played the ball?

In that picture the ball hasn't left his boot has it? He was offside if you ask me and the linesman was correct. Southgate, jumping around his technical aera and punching the air because he thought his team had scored however, was not. Rather amusingly... :)


I have seen it on TV now and tend to agree with Muskrat. In this photo he looks onside but from what I saw he dummied the cross and when the ball was played Viduka had strayed just offside.

iang040563
Member
Posts: 67
Joined: 07 Jul 2006 15:38
Location: SE20

Re: Vidukas onside goal

by iang040563 » 21 Aug 2006 20:22

retired aggro Lets hope that things even themselves out and Reading have a decent goal disallowed at Villa




Lots of sour grapes here methinks.
Are you telling me RA that you have not had the luck on your side occasionally and you have argued that it was a good goal???

I seem to remember a goal against Tottenham that crossed the line before your goal keeper caught it.

User avatar
rabidbee
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3662
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 17:51
Location: Like a dog to vomit

Re: Vidukas onside goal

by rabidbee » 21 Aug 2006 20:26

iang040563
retired aggro Lets hope that things even themselves out and Reading have a decent goal disallowed at Villa




Lots of sour grapes here methinks.
Are you telling me RA that you have not had the luck on your side occasionally and you have argued that it was a good goal???

I seem to remember a goal against Tottenham that crossed the line before your goal keeper caught it.


Don't rise to it...


User avatar
M4 Junction 11
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1718
Joined: 13 Jan 2006 22:36
Location: Land That Time Forgot

by M4 Junction 11 » 21 Aug 2006 20:42

OzBiscuit2004
Muskrat
Trigger


That's very good, but what position was he in when the Boro player actually played the ball?

In that picture the ball hasn't left his boot has it? He was offside if you ask me and the linesman was correct. Southgate, jumping around his technical aera and punching the air because he thought his team had scored however, was not. Rather amusingly... :)


I have seen it on TV now and tend to agree with Muskrat. In this photo he looks onside but from what I saw he dummied the cross and when the ball was played Viduka had strayed just offside.

Looks off-side to me :wink:

readingbedding
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4396
Joined: 06 Dec 2005 21:10
Location: cutting them all away for four runs

by readingbedding » 21 Aug 2006 20:51

It was offside.

Phucking good.

Even better.

Well done Lino

User avatar
Royal With Cheese
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5701
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 07:45
Location: location location

by Royal With Cheese » 21 Aug 2006 21:34

Trigger

As you can see, his shadow is clearly offside when the ball is kicked.

Good enough for me.

User avatar
purleyroyal
Member
Posts: 200
Joined: 17 Sep 2004 23:09
Location: going P.o.Tty

by purleyroyal » 21 Aug 2006 23:16

From R31 it was clearly offside :lol:


midlandadie
Member
Posts: 60
Joined: 09 Jul 2006 17:18
Location: midlands

by midlandadie » 22 Aug 2006 07:27

he was off side no doubt!

:wink:

readingbedding
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4396
Joined: 06 Dec 2005 21:10
Location: cutting them all away for four runs

by readingbedding » 22 Aug 2006 07:54

readingbedding It wasn't offside.

Phucking good.

Even better.

Well done Lino

Mr Angry
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5972
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:05
Location: South Oxfordshire

by Mr Angry » 22 Aug 2006 10:07

It was offside cos the lino said it was.

End of.

Move on all Reading FC hating posters.

blade 1
Member
Posts: 175
Joined: 01 Jan 2006 13:48

by blade 1 » 22 Aug 2006 10:14

come on he was miles on side(it has to be a part of his body he can play the ball with).

Nothing wrong with admitting you have had a lucky break, the promoted teams will need these if we are t stay up. Watford in particular are due one


royalsteve
Member
Posts: 957
Joined: 20 Apr 2004 23:13

Re: Vidukas onside goal

by royalsteve » 22 Aug 2006 10:15

retired aggro Lets hope that things even themselves out and Reading have a decent goal disallowed at Villa


do you live in surrey?

royalsteve
Member
Posts: 957
Joined: 20 Apr 2004 23:13

Re: Vidukas onside goal

by royalsteve » 22 Aug 2006 10:15

retired aggro Lets hope that things even themselves out and Reading have a decent goal disallowed at Villa


what do you know about football, bet you've never been to a game

Gordons Cumming
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5300
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 10:52
Location: All Good Things Come To An End

by Gordons Cumming » 22 Aug 2006 10:22

I blame Shorey for Boro even getting the chance in the first place.

We was caught out of position.

Needs to improve this part of his game a bit. Noticed him doing this last season but we weren't punished then.

Einstein agogo
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1061
Joined: 19 Aug 2004 12:32
Location: Shit Creek

by Einstein agogo » 22 Aug 2006 10:25

I think he WAS ONside.. BUT as said previously , we had a lucky break , and , going back to the original post , hoping that things even themselves out , they , without doubr , WILL.. BUT not neccessarily at villa , but sometime before the end of the season..that's what makes football , exciting... remember that perfectly good goal that was disallowed against Portugal during the european championships????

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

by Hoop Blah » 22 Aug 2006 10:28

I think the lino got it wrong, Viduka was onside when the ball was played.

As for it evening itself out of the season, I'd say it evened itself out over the course of the game. It could be argued that Doyle was fouled in the build up to the 'Boro opening goal or that Halsey gave 'Boro the benefit of doubt on a number of occassions when decisions could've gone our way.

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6682
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

by Wycombe Royal » 22 Aug 2006 10:34

Gordons Cumming I blame Shorey for Boro even getting the chance in the first place.

We was caught out of position.

Needs to improve this part of his game a bit. Noticed him doing this last season but we weren't punished then.

At least on this occasion Boro didn't score, whereas when Murty was caught out of position Boro did score with a nice volley from Downing. I remember Halls getting ripped apart for a similar mistake against Birmingham last season.

Mitch from Korea
New Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 19 Aug 2006 18:21

It is not worth discussion.

by Mitch from Korea » 22 Aug 2006 11:18

In my view, it was onside.

However, That`s also a part of football as you know. Sometimes ur team could get some advantages and get dis as well.

I don`t think Viduka still keeps it in his mind.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 228 guests

It is currently 27 Nov 2024 01:54