Vidukas onside goal

User avatar
Alan Partridge
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 7368
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 13:25
Location: In a daft little ground, watching a silly game so fcuk off

by Alan Partridge » 22 Aug 2006 11:28

He was onside but the linesman can be forgiven, we sit in Y21 and bang in line with it, we all called it 'offside' soon as he passed it. What I think happened was as the ball was crossed, Ingimarsson was right next to the crosser. As that ball goes across, Viduka is way ahead of Sonko, and with the crosser partially blocking the linesman's view (also with Ivar very close to him) Viduka looks way offside from that angle. It's only on a still photo, (which of course the lino doesn't see) that you can see clearly he's well onside. I'm not sure that the lino even sees Ivar.

We'll get something go against us, more than likely at somewhere like Stamford Bridge or OT like everyone else gets nothing :roll:

Mr Angry
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5972
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:05
Location: South Oxfordshire

by Mr Angry » 22 Aug 2006 11:31

blade 1 come on he was miles on side(it has to be a part of his body he can play the ball with).

Nothing wrong with admitting you have had a lucky break, the promoted teams will need these if we are t stay up. Watford in particular are due one


Absolutely.

Its football; as long as there are humans making decisions, incorrect decisions will be made (tho I think the lino can be forgiven for this one as it was marginal - even with the hindsight of super slow mo)

It could be argued that you are due a break after the penalty against you (had it been someone like Jagielka thru at Anfield and the same happened, think it would have been given??)

Though the worst decision by a long way was the pen decision against Watford - stunningly stupid!! Had THAT happened against you I think Colin would have gone into orbit....

:lol:

Gatecrasher
Member
Posts: 26
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 10:18
Location: hunting wolverines with a freaking 12 gauge

by Gatecrasher » 22 Aug 2006 11:52

the offside goal maybe balanced out by the fact Chris Riggott could have got a straight red according to half the reports I read.

or maybe it balances out Paddy Kenny not getting sent off last season :)

Gordons Cumming
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5300
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 10:52
Location: All Good Things Come To An End

by Gordons Cumming » 22 Aug 2006 11:56

Can I remind everyone that life isn't fair, hence this thread is irrelevant.

HTH

User avatar
Royal Fleet
Member
Posts: 136
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 08:53

by Royal Fleet » 22 Aug 2006 13:03

Gatecrasher or maybe it balances out Paddy Kenny not getting sent off last season :)


That still rates as the worst decision I have ever seen.


User avatar
zac naloen
Member
Posts: 852
Joined: 16 Jul 2006 16:27
Location: Woodley

by zac naloen » 22 Aug 2006 13:16

I noticed something watching highlights last night.

The point where they froze it then isn't the point where the ball was played. The player dummied the ball so he had it for at least two seconds after that..

User avatar
purleyroyal
Member
Posts: 200
Joined: 17 Sep 2004 23:09
Location: going P.o.Tty

by purleyroyal » 22 Aug 2006 13:21

Or maybe it just looked like he dummied it because they froze the picture :D

East Stand Royal 500
Member
Posts: 111
Joined: 30 Mar 2006 09:33

by East Stand Royal 500 » 22 Aug 2006 13:33

1960
Billy The Fish In my considered opinion, the habit they have on MOTD and other progs of freezing the action at the exact moment the pass is made does linesmen no favours at all.

Good point. And it opens up another area for debate. MOTD and Sky freeze it just as the foot touches the ball. But has it been kicked at this point? No. It has been kicked when the foot moves forward propelling the ball forward. In this very close decision I feel that Viduka was offside by the time the foot moved forward. So, to repeat the point - when is the ball actually passed if not as I suggest?


You could say that the pass occurs when the ball actually parts company with the passers's foot - as long as he has contact with the ball he hasn't passed it.

User avatar
zac naloen
Member
Posts: 852
Joined: 16 Jul 2006 16:27
Location: Woodley

by zac naloen » 22 Aug 2006 13:42

purleyroyal Or maybe it just looked like he dummied it because they froze the picture :D


I'd upload a video of it but i need to sort out a transfer from video to my comp as i don't have a dvd recorder. But there was a definate dummy after that freeze as he tried to round the nearest defender whilst viduka ran into an offside position.


User avatar
mattyougg
Member
Posts: 202
Joined: 31 Jan 2006 23:15
Location: Lancaster

by mattyougg » 22 Aug 2006 14:49

Incorrect; having watched the all the video replays frame by frame, I have noted that Viduka does not stray into an offside position until he puts the ball into the net when it does not matter.

It was not a goal, because in the opinion of the officials he was offside. REMEMBER – the referee’s decision is final.

ROYALREF
New Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 14 Dec 2005 13:40

by ROYALREF » 22 Aug 2006 15:14

IT WAS OFFSIDE - HONEST

ROYALREF SAYS SO

:oops:

Gatecrasher
Member
Posts: 26
Joined: 29 Jul 2004 10:18
Location: hunting wolverines with a freaking 12 gauge

by Gatecrasher » 22 Aug 2006 15:28

since we are obviously racked with guilt about this, maybe we should ask for the game to be replayed

User avatar
SpaceCruiser
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 5590
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 14:17
Location: Desperately seeking to return home

by SpaceCruiser » 22 Aug 2006 15:30

Gatecrasher since we are obviously racked with guilt about this, maybe we should ask for the game to be replayed


Can we replay the league cup quarter final first? Obviously we would have to get Asaba back, but they can have Paul Merson back.


blade 1
Member
Posts: 175
Joined: 01 Jan 2006 13:48

by blade 1 » 22 Aug 2006 15:47

or maybe it balances out Paddy Kenny not getting sent off last season


i think that was balanced out by the rugby tackle from harper? on keeeeff. :?

No point worrying about it all the promoted teams will have to deal with the refs being biased towards the big teams this year. The same happened every time we played them in the cups, and it will never change

User avatar
Spirit of Elm Park
Member
Posts: 448
Joined: 21 Feb 2005 13:38
Location: Wiltshire - Past Swinedon thankfully

by Spirit of Elm Park » 22 Aug 2006 16:10

Best analysis of this, and I hate to say it, was by Andy Gray on Sunday night. Used the virtual reality view and span it around to show the linesmans view, from where he was he "guessed" that viduka was probably offside as he was a couple of yards behind play. Not IMO a bad decision, but a human decision, that on this occasion, went in our favour.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 248 guests

It is currently 27 Nov 2024 03:30