Adam Federici: Is He Good Enough?

170 posts

Do you think Adam can perform well enough to keep Hahnemann out of the team once he is fit?

Yes
146
70%
No
22
11%
We'll see
41
20%
 
Total votes: 209
Woodcote Royal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 3490
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:24
Location: Relocation to Surrey completed

Re: Adam Federici: Is He Good Enough?

by Woodcote Royal » 12 Jan 2009 15:04

brendywendy Had serious doubts about fed,mainly on positioning. But with a run of games he has quicky put that to bed.in the last few games he has been dominant in the air,and still great with shots and kicking.
If marcus was 30 id be tempted to put him in, but in the knowledge that he hasnt much time left with us, its now more important to get fed some 1st team experience,the only thing he currently lacks. He will only continue to improve in my opinion.


If we have one area that Steve Coppell should be totally comfortable with if we go up, then surely it's between the sticks.

I will be surprised if Marcus walks straight back in the team as Fed as shown he's more than good enough but I don't buy this "Hahnemann won't be with us much longer" theory.

There are several older 'keepers in the Prem than Marcus.

We should just be delighted this club has 2 'keepers of excellent quality who, as ever, cost next to nothing.

One experienced older hand and his younger replacement already showing that he has what it takes..................great news for all of us.

loyalroyal4life
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5595
Joined: 15 May 2007 11:58

Re: Adam Federici: Is He Good Enough?

by loyalroyal4life » 12 Jan 2009 15:13

And he has scored more goals than USA for us!!

User avatar
Murts-is-Lej
Member
Posts: 254
Joined: 31 Mar 2008 14:41
Location: Hungerford

Re: Adam Federici: Is He Good Enough?

by Murts-is-Lej » 13 Jan 2009 22:07

Woodcote Royal I don't buy this "Hahnemann won't be with us much longer" theory.


USA was on the Football League podcast a couple of weeks ago saying he wanted to do another couple of years in England, preferably in the Prem, before going back to the US. With The Fed playing as well as he is I'm not sure he'll even last that long.

When The Fed first came into the team last month he looked a bit suspect not coming for crosses that I think USA would have done. However, at the Watford game he seemed much more assured. His distribution is always brilliant and you notice how much the strikers anticipate his quick kicks, compared to how they have a nice stroll about before USA gets round to pumping one high in the air. I'd like to see him in a few 1-on-1s and also a game where we're under pressure (may have to wait until next season in the Prem for that at this rate?!) before I can say all aspects of his game have truly beaten USA's.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Adam Federici: Is He Good Enough?

by Ian Royal » 13 Jan 2009 23:15

The biggest question about Hahnemann staying is if Fed keeps him out for the rest of the season. Is Hahnemann going to be willing to stay as Fed's equal or even cover, when he could go to another club and be first choice for a year or two without much problem.

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: Adam Federici: Is He Good Enough?

by Hoop Blah » 14 Jan 2009 09:30

There is also the issue over how long we're willing to offer him and how long he wants in terms of a contract.

I can't see him really wanting to go to another English club though, especially if it means a relocation.


rhroyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2639
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 10:19

Re: Adam Federici: Is He Good Enough?

by rhroyal » 14 Jan 2009 10:00

Marcus is left in an interesting place if Fedders keeps his position.

Firstly Marcus is a model professional and will understand that he has lost his place in the team entirely fairly. For as long as he was at the club he'd put in a lot of work to put pressure on Fedders and take his chance whilst it arrived. However he's 36. Even if he keeps going till 40, he won't have long left. He also has this aim for going to 2010 with U.S.A. If he really wants to meet this ambition he has no hope as an understudy. From that position he could well view moving to a different club as a good solution. When Federici had to bide his time he was 22-24. He had probably about 15 years of his career left and could afford to be patient. Marcus can't really afford to be and if he can't get back in the team I wouldn't be surprised to see him move on. At the same time he loves this club so maybe I'm wrong. I hope I am, I'm convinced he'll be good enough to do us a good service for another couple of years.

User avatar
Alan Partridge
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 7368
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 13:25
Location: In a daft little ground, watching a silly game so fcuk off

Re: Adam Federici: Is He Good Enough?

by Alan Partridge » 14 Jan 2009 10:10

I think Federici has deputised well so far. He's done the basics right and we all know about his kicking. The one thing I would say is that he has still yet to be severely tested by anyone. Our defense has been rock solid pretty much in front of him, so much so that in all the games he's played he's probably only made a couple of half decent saves. It will be interesting to see if a team can put us under enough pressure to really test him out again. Man Utd did twice, in 1 of them he shone and the other he flopped,that's the only thing I'd say for those seemingly trying to move Hahnemann aside. Marcus over a number of years has been consistently very good.

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: Adam Federici: Is He Good Enough?

by Hoop Blah » 14 Jan 2009 10:15

Marcus might be a model pro, but it's easy to be that way when your the first name on the teamsheet. Don't forget his outbursts about lack of bonus and pay rises when we went up.

For a 'model pro' I think he was a little too outspoken for my liking, but apart from that he's been great.

Charles Dapper
Member
Posts: 53
Joined: 02 Jan 2007 19:31
Location: Just outside the Royal County

Why Should Feds warm the bench

by Charles Dapper » 15 Jan 2009 14:02

Looks like the Big Fella Marcus is almost back to fitness, so what does SSC do?

Feds has been brilliant for us during this time, and I for one feel he has made the place his.
His distribution is spot on
He never keeps the ball, reacts quickly and gets it straight back out.
Very confident on corners, set pieces.
Made some very good saves, although to be fair not really been tested that much.
Has scored a goal

So according to SSC policy of being loyal to whoever has the shirt at the moment, he should keep starting .

Or will he?


User avatar
Thames
Member
Posts: 629
Joined: 19 Jun 2007 13:57
Location: Burbados

Re: Why Should Feds warm the bench

by Thames » 15 Jan 2009 14:04

He's not good enough for the Prem. We should sign a Premiership quality keeper now otherwise it will be more dissapointment for this football club.

User avatar
Bill Oddie's Beard
Member
Posts: 998
Joined: 18 Jun 2008 13:49
Location: Why aren't I a prostitute Bret?

Re: Why Should Feds warm the bench

by Bill Oddie's Beard » 15 Jan 2009 14:06

Charles Dapper Looks like the Big Fella Marcus is almost back to fitness, so what does SSC do?

Feds has been brilliant for us during this time, and I for one feel he has made the place his.
His distribution is spot on
He never keeps the ball, reacts quickly and gets it straight back out.
Very confident on corners, set pieces.
Made some very good saves, although to be fair not really been tested that much.
Has scored a goal

So according to SSC policy of being loyal to whoever has the shirt at the moment, he should keep starting .

Or will he?


He'll keep starting until he makes a howler or gets injured, imo.

User avatar
Thames
Member
Posts: 629
Joined: 19 Jun 2007 13:57
Location: Burbados

Re: Why Should Feds warm the bench

by Thames » 15 Jan 2009 14:06

Next week then.

User avatar
SteveRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2441
Joined: 29 Jan 2008 17:48

Re: Why Should Feds warm the bench

by SteveRoyal » 15 Jan 2009 14:14

Thames Next week then.


Positivity isn't your thing, is it?


OLLIE KEARNS
Member
Posts: 436
Joined: 23 May 2008 10:30
Location: East Berks

Re: Why Should Feds warm the bench

by OLLIE KEARNS » 15 Jan 2009 14:15

Thames He's not good enough for the Prem. We should sign a Premiership quality keeper now otherwise it will be more dissapointment for this football club.


Thames, tell us why he isn't good enough. What is he lacking that a Prem keeper has ? Marcus was a prem keeper so maybe compare the two and tell us where Fed comes up short in your opinion.

User avatar
Thames
Member
Posts: 629
Joined: 19 Jun 2007 13:57
Location: Burbados

Re: Why Should Feds warm the bench

by Thames » 15 Jan 2009 14:15

SteveRoyal
Thames Next week then.


Positivity isn't your thing, is it?


Not when we're talking about Reading FC son.

Charles Dapper
Member
Posts: 53
Joined: 02 Jan 2007 19:31
Location: Just outside the Royal County

Re: Why Should Feds warm the bench

by Charles Dapper » 15 Jan 2009 14:15

Thames He's not good enough for the Prem. We should sign a Premiership quality keeper now otherwise it will be more dissapointment for this football club.


I would disagree.

We had USA in the prem and I see Feds as a better all round prospect.

User avatar
Thames
Member
Posts: 629
Joined: 19 Jun 2007 13:57
Location: Burbados

Re: Why Should Feds warm the bench

by Thames » 15 Jan 2009 14:15

OLLIE KEARNS
Thames He's not good enough for the Prem. We should sign a Premiership quality keeper now otherwise it will be more dissapointment for this football club.


Thames, tell us why he isn't good enough. What is he lacking that a Prem keeper has ? Marcus was a prem keeper so maybe compare the two and tell us where Fed comes up short in your opinion.


Man Utd @ home in the Cup replay. Shocking performance.

User avatar
Thames
Member
Posts: 629
Joined: 19 Jun 2007 13:57
Location: Burbados

Re: Why Should Feds warm the bench

by Thames » 15 Jan 2009 14:16

Charles Dapper
Thames He's not good enough for the Prem. We should sign a Premiership quality keeper now otherwise it will be more dissapointment for this football club.


I would disagree.

We had USA in the prem and I see Feds as a better all round prospect.


Personally think Fed should have saved Mcgoldricks goal at Southampton and Ledleys at Cardiff. Chopra beat him at his near post as well...

User avatar
Thaumagurist*
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3539
Joined: 01 Feb 2008 16:15
Location: We must now face the long dark of Exeter.

Re: Why Should Feds warm the bench

by Thaumagurist* » 15 Jan 2009 14:19

Thames He's not good enough for the Prem. We should sign a Premiership quality keeper now otherwise it will be more dissapointment for this football club.


Adults are having a grown up discussion here. You 12 year-olds better had run along and play on your x-boxes or better yet, do some homework.

User avatar
SteveRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2441
Joined: 29 Jan 2008 17:48

Re: Why Should Feds warm the bench

by SteveRoyal » 15 Jan 2009 14:23

Thaumagurist* Adults are having a grown up discussion here. You 12 year-olds better had run along and play on your x-boxes or better yet, do some homework.


Come now, come now. Behave.

170 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: WestYorksRoyal and 185 guests

It is currently 18 Dec 2024 14:23