by Barry the bird boggler » 25 May 2010 19:29
by Dirk Gently » 26 May 2010 11:09
The whole year innDirk GentlyPieEater I agree all clubs have idiot fans, but Cardiff have a disproportionate number compared to other clubs that regularly create incidents. How many other clubs have bubble trips? They also have the FAW excuse card to play. That's why I have a rational dislike for Cardiff.
Stoke, Millwall, Burnley amongst others.
How many of them involve matches with Cardiff?
by bobbybottler » 26 May 2010 22:45
by Tony Le Mesmer » 27 May 2010 10:33
bobbybottler Portsmouth have offered to pay their creditors 20 pence in every pound they owe, according to bbc sport. Looks like HMRC may oppose the proposed timescales for the payment of this though, which would mean that Portsmouth wouldn't be out of administration quickly enough to avoid starting next season with a 10 point penalty....as I understand it.
Article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 707231.stm
by TFF » 27 May 2010 10:45
bobbybottler Portsmouth have offered to pay their creditors 20 pence in every pound they owe
bobbybottler Looks like HMRC may oppose the proposed timescales
by exileinleeds » 27 May 2010 11:02
by Messiah » 27 May 2010 11:05
by Skyline » 27 May 2010 12:40
Tony Le Mesmerbobbybottler Portsmouth have offered to pay their creditors 20 pence in every pound they owe, according to bbc sport. Looks like HMRC may oppose the proposed timescales for the payment of this though, which would mean that Portsmouth wouldn't be out of administration quickly enough to avoid starting next season with a 10 point penalty....as I understand it.
Article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 707231.stm
Surely that picture is enough for any unsecured creditor to vote against the CVA?
and the 10 points is a minimum, it can be anything above that. See Luton, Bournemouth, etc.
by Wycombe Royal » 27 May 2010 13:36
by Messiah » 27 May 2010 13:52
by soggy biscuit » 27 May 2010 13:58
by Row Z Royal » 27 May 2010 13:58
by PieEater » 27 May 2010 14:06
by T.R.O.L.I. » 27 May 2010 14:07
bobbybottler Portsmouth have offered to pay their creditors 20 pence in every pound they owe, according to bbc sport. Looks like HMRC may oppose the proposed timescales for the payment of this though, which would mean that Portsmouth wouldn't be out of administration quickly enough to avoid starting next season with a 10 point penalty....as I understand it.
Article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 707231.stm
by Messiah » 27 May 2010 14:15
soggy biscuit Steve Cotterall to be Portsmouth manager
by leww_rfc » 27 May 2010 14:29
by TFF » 27 May 2010 14:29
Wycombe Royal Looks like Cardiff's money problems are coming to an end....
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2010/05/27/malaysians-target-top-two-as-cardiff-city-takeover-agreed-91466-26534209/
by Tony Le Mesmer » 27 May 2010 14:59
SkylineTony Le Mesmerbobbybottler Portsmouth have offered to pay their creditors 20 pence in every pound they owe, according to bbc sport. Looks like HMRC may oppose the proposed timescales for the payment of this though, which would mean that Portsmouth wouldn't be out of administration quickly enough to avoid starting next season with a 10 point penalty....as I understand it.
Article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 707231.stm
Surely that picture is enough for any unsecured creditor to vote against the CVA?
and the 10 points is a minimum, it can be anything above that. See Luton, Bournemouth, etc.
I thought Bournemouth (and Rotherham) got hit with the 17pt penalties because they didn't have the CVA in place before the start of the season. The 10pts is just for being in administration isn't it?
by Tony Le Mesmer » 27 May 2010 16:17
by Tony Le Mesmer » 27 May 2010 20:19
IdealTony Le Mesmer HMRC have countered this by applying a 100% penalty to the amount due for late payment.
Source?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 108 guests