by maffff » 07 Feb 2013 15:31
by under the tin » 07 Feb 2013 16:54
maffff I just hope aesthetically the final product is as nice as the plans we had drawn up for the extension originally.
by The Royal » 07 Feb 2013 17:34
by SPARTA » 07 Feb 2013 18:37
under the tinmaffff I just hope aesthetically the final product is as nice as the plans we had drawn up for the extension originally.
I can't see the plans being the same.
Reckon that TSI will adjust the expansion to include more corporate hospitality. Boxes.
by ZacNaloen » 07 Feb 2013 18:42
by RoyalBlue » 07 Feb 2013 18:46
The Royal It's weird to think our highest attendance was at elm park, 33 odd thousand
by Royal91 » 07 Feb 2013 18:47
SPARTAunder the tinmaffff I just hope aesthetically the final product is as nice as the plans we had drawn up for the extension originally.
I can't see the plans being the same.
Reckon that TSI will adjust the expansion to include more corporate hospitality. Boxes.
I actually hope they do change the plans and add a row of boxes at the top of the current East Stand. It makes financial sense, and would create a beast of a stand when it's finished with another 7000 on top.
The fancy idea of sloping roofs isn't my cup of tea either. It's actually a waste of space if we wanted to maximise what available space there is to expand the stadium. Just expand straight back. Later we can do the same behind the goals if required, and then the corners if need be.
by Royal91 » 07 Feb 2013 18:50
by SPARTA » 07 Feb 2013 19:00
Royal91 Do we have any photoshop gurus will to knocking their interpretation!
Is it me or does the Madstad feel bigger and more open than most stadiums. Because most neutrals I talk think it already holds 30,000
larry1971
by notloyalenuffroyal » 07 Feb 2013 20:37
ZacNaloen I'd also like to see provisioning for easy installation of safe standing...
by ruprecht » 07 Feb 2013 21:27
by ScottishRoyal » 07 Feb 2013 21:33
by SLAMMED » 07 Feb 2013 21:36
by Ian Royal » 07 Feb 2013 22:22
Royal Lady But I thought AZ said we'd start expansion at the end of this season, if we stayed up? If we started it this Summer, we wouldn't need to reapply for planning permission. Why the change of heart I wonder?
ZacNaloen I'd also like to see provisioning for easy installation of safe standing...
by Rex » 07 Feb 2013 22:23
SLAMMED The expansion can fuck off. Having a prawn sandwich section across the middle of the East stand will kill any remaining atmosphere we have.
by Rex » 07 Feb 2013 22:28
ruprecht If you go the planning portal on RBCs website they have all the technical drawings there in the planning application. The East stand just gets extended back with no step with provision at the top for the media. I really like the look of the design as just one tier.
by SLAMMED » 07 Feb 2013 22:41
royalexileSLAMMED The expansion can fuck off. Having a prawn sandwich section across the middle of the East stand will kill any remaining atmosphere we have.
Aside from moving your seat i agree. Can the corporate please put up with the knuckle biting swearing.
by Royal With Cheese » 07 Feb 2013 22:45
royalexileruprecht If you go the planning portal on RBCs website they have all the technical drawings there in the planning application. The East stand just gets extended back with no step with provision at the top for the media. I really like the look of the design as just one tier.
AZ states the design spec and planning permission have lapsed. Stick an extension on the corporate in the North Stand, and extend to the North East Corner. Made the East Stand one continuous stand with no split level.
by Rex » 07 Feb 2013 22:56
SLAMMEDroyalexileSLAMMED The expansion can fuck off. Having a prawn sandwich section across the middle of the East stand will kill any remaining atmosphere we have.
Aside from moving your seat i agree. Can the corporate please put up with the knuckle biting swearing.
My seat is within the zone they've designated for corporate so I have to move
by Rex » 07 Feb 2013 23:00
Royal With Cheeseroyalexileruprecht If you go the planning portal on RBCs website they have all the technical drawings there in the planning application. The East stand just gets extended back with no step with provision at the top for the media. I really like the look of the design as just one tier.
AZ states the design spec and planning permission have lapsed. Stick an extension on the corporate in the North Stand, and extend to the North East Corner. Made the East Stand one continuous stand with no split level.
I thought it elapsed in November this year?
Have we any planners in the Nob community?
Planning laws in NI are similar but not exaclty the same. Here you have two years from permission being granted to start a development. Once work has begun on the foundations there is no limit on how long it can take.
Are there rules in GB on how long you have to complete a project?
I'm hoping that Anton's vision for the ground is somewhat grander than Madejski's and this is why they want to reapply for planning permission.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests