by londinium » 08 Oct 2007 11:53
by Wycombe Royal » 08 Oct 2007 11:53
The whole year innIan RoyalThe whole year innWycombe RoyalThe whole year inn Would you rather have Koumas on the wing, or Leroy Rosenoir?
Koumas prefers central midfield and is also left footed.
So, still infinitely better than our right wing options, then?
What is it with you and Koumas!? We were in no position to buy him when we needed a right winger. He may be marginly better than Oster and Seol, but thats hardly going to improve the team a great deal so why waste lots of money on a guy who is barely better than what we have. Oh and I say again, he;d already gone elsewhere.
Are you his freaking mother or something?
Just an example of a player we could have realistically signed, but ended up at a club of similar stature to ours.
Considering our total absence of a right winger in our team I don't think it is stupid.
Just a point of view Ian, no need to aggravate your ulcer about it FFS. Chill out
Yes I am his mum
Instead of spending in quality we are forced to bring in the likes of Koumas who is finally starting to show his true colours - three times he gave the ball away today and three times it lead to a United goal. Not ONCE did he even attempt to track back and win the ball back.
by RobRoyal » 08 Oct 2007 11:56
Vision Just a question.
If last season hadn't happened and this was our first in the Premier Division, would those people ringing their hands in dismay now, actually be commending us on our fine start to the season.?
by brendywendy » 08 Oct 2007 11:56
londinium Message for Blue_Elm who felt he had to create a new thread that has rightly been locked....
You are a TOTAL PLANK.
If you think Derby could have been 4 up by half time I think you was watching the wrong game.
If you said that Reading could and should have been leading 4-0 by half time then it would make sense.
2 decent Hunt chances, 1 decent header from Doyle, 2 penalty shouts of which one was so blatant I almost laughed that it wasnt given.
IDIOT
by SpaceCruiser » 08 Oct 2007 12:05
brendywendylondinium Message for Blue_Elm who felt he had to create a new thread that has rightly been locked....
You are a TOTAL PLANK.
If you think Derby could have been 4 up by half time I think you was watching the wrong game.
If you said that Reading could and should have been leading 4-0 by half time then it would make sense.
2 decent Hunt chances, 1 decent header from Doyle, 2 penalty shouts of which one was so blatant I almost laughed that it wasnt given.
IDIOT
i thought that
was gutted it got locked so i couldnt give him a piece of whats left of my mind
by Yorkshire Royal » 08 Oct 2007 12:28
by Dirk Gently » 08 Oct 2007 12:30
Yorkshire Royal What exactly was Gunnarson picked for?
by Huntley & Palmer » 08 Oct 2007 12:31
Yorkshire Royal What exactly was Gunnarson picked for?
by Royal Rother » 08 Oct 2007 13:23
by BR2 » 08 Oct 2007 13:30
sheshnu There's no way Reading put out their best 11 players yesterday but the team is still ticking over and picking up important points against the likes of Derby. I'm hoping that once the starting 11 contains more of the best players at the club we'll start to see a few more positive results, and fingers crossed that'll be sooner rather than later.
Still, 3 points away from the top half ain't too bad considering the stuttering start..!
by Top Flight » 08 Oct 2007 13:43
by RoyalBlue » 08 Oct 2007 13:45
Huntley & PalmerYorkshire Royal What exactly was Gunnarson picked for?
His heading ability at set pieces
Top Flight Everybody knows that there are issues that need to be sorted out. Coppell knows himself and has already admitted that we have shortcomings.
Only in January can Coppell solve those problems. So what is the point discussing the same issues after every game. We've already thrashed this one out after the Wigan game.
The result doesn't paper over the cracks. Everyone knows that there are cracks. Most importantly Coppell knows. He will sort it out when the transfer window allows.
by Barry the bird boggler » 08 Oct 2007 13:47
londinium Message for Blue_Elm who felt he had to create a new thread that has rightly been locked....
You are a TOTAL PLANK.
If you think Derby could have been 4 up by half time I think you was watching the wrong game.
If you said that Reading could and should have been leading 4-0 by half time then it would make sense.
2 decent Hunt chances, 1 decent header from Doyle, 2 penalty shouts of which one was so blatant I almost laughed that it wasnt given.
IDIOT
by Top Flight » 08 Oct 2007 14:08
RoyalBlueHuntley & PalmerYorkshire Royal What exactly was Gunnarson picked for?
His heading ability at set pieces
In which case Shorey and Rosenior need to improve their delivery from set pieces!
I've lost count of how many freekicks we were awarded to us within 30 yards of the Derby goal. All were wasted. One of the players mentioned that they were having double training sessions ever since the Portsmouth fiasco. This may be true but they certainly can't have been practising set pieces in our favour!Top Flight Everybody knows that there are issues that need to be sorted out. Coppell knows himself and has already admitted that we have shortcomings.
Only in January can Coppell solve those problems. So what is the point discussing the same issues after every game. We've already thrashed this one out after the Wigan game.
The result doesn't paper over the cracks. Everyone knows that there are cracks. Most importantly Coppell knows. He will sort it out when the transfer window allows.
Some of the problems can and must be sorted out now. For example our wage structure. We need to pay sensible PL wages if we really wish to compete and survive at the top level. If we don't, not only will SC stand little chance of attracting all of the players we need come January but our existing squad are likely to be pretty peed off knowing that they are paid well below those they are expected to compete against week in week out and also knowing that a good number of them could move elsewhere for better money.
by retro royal » 08 Oct 2007 15:12
by Royal Rother » 08 Oct 2007 15:16
by Denver Royal » 08 Oct 2007 15:41
Vision Just a question.
If last season hadn't happened and this was our first in the Premier Division, would those people ringing their hands in dismay now, actually be commending us on our fine start to the season.?
by RoyalBlue » 09 Oct 2007 08:22
Denver RoyalVision Just a question.
If last season hadn't happened and this was our first in the Premier Division, would those people ringing their hands in dismay now, actually be commending us on our fine start to the season.?
I doubt it. It wouldn't have taken long for the pi$$ing and moaning to start in earnest. The 'Coppell out!' brigade would have been in full force by Xmas.
by brendywendy » 09 Oct 2007 10:04
RoyalBlueDenver RoyalVision Just a question.
If last season hadn't happened and this was our first in the Premier Division, would those people ringing their hands in dismay now, actually be commending us on our fine start to the season.?
I doubt it. It wouldn't have taken long for the pi$$ing and moaning to start in earnest. The 'Coppell out!' brigade would have been in full force by Xmas.
I'm not sure they would have been moaning at Sir Steve. If we had started our first season (i.e 2006/07) in the manner we have this, I think the flack would have been justifiably aimed at the Chairman for hitting us with absolutely exhorbitant increases in season ticket prices (86% in the case of my family) to 'enable us to compete effectively at this level, whilst still maintaining a Championship wage structure.
People seem to have short memories and this year's freeze in season tickets appears to have pacified most, despite the fact the club should be considerably better off thanks to the increase in TV money coming into the PL.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 260 guests