Stadium Expansion

1747 posts
User avatar
Royal Ginger
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7208
Joined: 27 Mar 2012 19:05
Location: New Forest

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Royal Ginger » 16 Sep 2013 21:30

If people sit in the seats or not the club still gets the cash. 36,000 is a bit big, but we don't know the details of the planning permission, so it may be 'up to' that figure.

Blue Label
Member
Posts: 99
Joined: 05 May 2005 22:34
Location: Hants

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Blue Label » 16 Sep 2013 22:02

Current capacity from official site 24161 + proposed increase 12400 = 36561. Maybe one day

No Fixed Abode

Re: Stadium Expansion

by No Fixed Abode » 17 Sep 2013 11:44

Blue Label Current capacity from official site 24161 + proposed increase 12400 = 36561. Maybe one day


18,000 at the last home game. Would be half empty if they expanded to 36k.

IMO. The club would be better improving what they've got. Fill in the the 'floating roof' gap, to improve acoustics. Improve the concourse areas. Improve the catering.

User avatar
Winchester Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1749
Joined: 15 Mar 2005 14:42
Location: GEEK

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Winchester Royal » 17 Sep 2013 11:46

No Fixed Abode
Blue Label Current capacity from official site 24161 + proposed increase 12400 = 36561. Maybe one day


18,000 at the last home game. Would be half empty if they expanded to 36k.

IMO. The club would be better improving what they've got. Fill in the the 'floating roof' gap, to improve acoustics. Improve the concourse areas. Improve the catering.


And reduce the prices to try to get more people in through the doors. Nobody wants to watch football in a half-empty stadium and extra bums on seats means increased merchandise and food sales.

User avatar
SPARTA
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4742
Joined: 23 Sep 2012 17:40
Location: If you give us 90 minutes, we'll give you a lifetime

Re: Stadium Expansion

by SPARTA » 17 Sep 2013 12:19

SLAMMED The attendance they announce is calculated on tickets sold though, not how many people are actually at the game.


Only at the back end of the season were there a few games where STH's decided to stay at home though. You look at the previous two Premiership seasons as well and it was only away fans that'd let us down. We should definitely build onto the East Stand. The rest can wait.


User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13760
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Royal Lady » 17 Sep 2013 12:42

http://www.getreading.co.uk/news/local-news/reading-fc-given-until-next-6029119

LOLz

So, anyway, can someone explain to me why the club need until next Monday before signing the legal paperwork? :|

User avatar
SPARTA
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4742
Joined: 23 Sep 2012 17:40
Location: If you give us 90 minutes, we'll give you a lifetime

Re: Stadium Expansion

by SPARTA » 17 Sep 2013 12:59

Royal Lady http://www.getreading.co.uk/news/local-news/reading-fc-given-until-next-6029119

LOLz

So, anyway, can someone explain to me why the club need until next Monday before signing the legal paperwork? :|


It doesn't really matter. The club has a reason for it and it makes no difference to our lives.

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Platypuss » 17 Sep 2013 13:23

Royal Lady http://www.getreading.co.uk/news/local-news/reading-fc-given-until-next-6029119

LOLz

So, anyway, can someone explain to me why the club need until next Monday before signing the legal paperwork? :|


Perhaps because they reviewed the terms of the application as they were up for renewal and wanted to vary the conditions but needed more time to finalise the new condition?

If it was a truly serious issue they'd surely be asking for a longer extension than a week.

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Stadium Expansion

by melonhead » 17 Sep 2013 15:19

agreed.

jeez RL

there are probably a load more real issues to be worried about than that imo


User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13760
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Royal Lady » 17 Sep 2013 16:23

I'm only asking because I want to understand. :roll:

We'll see if the explanations given were correct, at some stage, I suppose. Thank you.

kwik-silva
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1909
Joined: 11 Feb 2008 07:26

Re: Stadium Expansion

by kwik-silva » 17 Sep 2013 19:16

you're not allowed to understand. You have to blindly pick a side here.

User avatar
One8Seven1
Member
Posts: 627
Joined: 02 Jul 2013 18:41

Re: Stadium Expansion

by One8Seven1 » 17 Sep 2013 19:36

Platypuss
Royal Lady http://www.getreading.co.uk/news/local-news/reading-fc-given-until-next-6029119

LOLz

So, anyway, can someone explain to me why the club need until next Monday before signing the legal paperwork? :|


Perhaps because they reviewed the terms of the application as they were up for renewal and wanted to vary the conditions but needed more time to finalise the new condition?

If it was a truly serious issue they'd surely be asking for a longer extension than a week.


Exactly. Why do our fans look for a conspiracy with everything, or feel they need to know the reason for everything? Think back a little, Anton said the club would renew the planning permission, and he also said the plans in place may change, and they appear to have done so.

User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13760
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Royal Lady » 18 Sep 2013 08:58

Just seems odd that they only want a week's grace before signing the forms - they must have known when it was up for renewal and known what changes they wanted to make - still, I'll bow to everyone else's better "knowledge" and lack of worrying....


M Brook
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 1347
Joined: 16 Apr 2004 12:54
Location: Between Yateley & Bideford

Re: Stadium Expansion

by M Brook » 18 Sep 2013 11:51

Royal Lady Just seems odd that they only want a week's grace before signing the forms - they must have known when it was up for renewal and known what changes they wanted to make - still, I'll bow to everyone else's better "knowledge" and lack of worrying....


The report that went to the RBC Planning Committee is available via this page - http://www.reading.gov.uk/meetings/details/3584/

The newspaper report is a little misleading but it is quite a complex matter. The Council's report explains that the original 2007 permission to extend was renewed in 2010 and is due to run out this coming November. The renewal contained a number of conditions. It looks like RFC want to proceed with part of the permission, the upgrading of the Outside Broadcast Unit, before the November deadline but don't want to be constrained by the conditions originally imposed until they proceed with the rest of the permission. It would appear that, in agreeing to this, the council is insisting that RFC agree to some additional (replacement/interim?) conditions and that these have to be agreed by 23rd September.

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Stadium Expansion

by melonhead » 18 Sep 2013 12:03

Platypuss
Royal Lady http://www.getreading.co.uk/news/local-news/reading-fc-given-until-next-6029119

LOLz

So, anyway, can someone explain to me why the club need until next Monday before signing the legal paperwork? :|


Perhaps because they reviewed the terms of the application as they were up for renewal and wanted to vary the conditions but needed more time to finalise the new condition?

If it was a truly serious issue they'd surely be asking for a longer extension than a week.


it says it in the article youve linked to RL

please do try and read it before going all oxf*rd david icke on us

Its application involves a variation of one condition.

The changes, which involve engineering works, are to ease the phasing of the development, particularly the new outside broadcast unit area.

User avatar
PieEater
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6542
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 15:42
Location: Comfortably numb

Re: Stadium Expansion

by PieEater » 18 Sep 2013 12:16

IIRC they had to do some modifications to Hurst Way first before doing anything else, so it makes sense they wouldn't want to do that if they just want to build some new OB area.

G'La
Member
Posts: 304
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 12:35

Re: Stadium Expansion

by G'La » 19 Sep 2013 13:59

Plans for the media area are detailed on RBC Planning website. This link may work... http://documents.reading.gov.uk/AniteIM ... sults.aspx

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Platypuss » 19 Sep 2013 14:13

That is a pretty shoddy set of documents and drawings it has to be said. You'd think they'd be able to spell the name of the stadium right every time.

User avatar
PieEater
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6542
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 15:42
Location: Comfortably numb

Re: Stadium Expansion

by PieEater » 19 Sep 2013 14:26

Interesting link G'La. It looks like it's just a parking area behind the SE corner with some walls built and presumably some fencing to make it into a compound.

In the application text it says:

"In November 2012 the Premier League amended their rules relating to media access and specification for stadium.
The Premier League will work with all Clubs to assess existing facilities and their plans to implement the new rules but the new rules are extensive and relate to: television cameras, dedicated rooms for broadcasters, mixed media zones, dedicated car park spaces and the location of that Outside Broadcast Compound (OBC). The rules also relate to radio and photography and the requirements to accommodate overseas broadcasting companies. As an example for a Premier League match televised live and in 3D, 33 cameras would be required and an additional 8 3D cameras. All of these will require multimedia and power connections provided by the Club"

User avatar
Alexander Litvinenko
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2709
Joined: 23 Jan 2012 13:58
Location: Winner - HNA? Music Quiz 2013. The Great Sounds of Polonium 210.

Re: Stadium Expansion

by Alexander Litvinenko » 19 Sep 2013 14:29

PieEater Interesting link G'La. It looks like it's just a parking area behind the SE corner with some walls built and presumably some fencing to make it into a compound.

In the application text it says:

"In November 2012 the Premier League amended their rules relating to media access and specification for stadium.
The Premier League will work with all Clubs to assess existing facilities and their plans to implement the new rules but the new rules are extensive and relate to: television cameras, dedicated rooms for broadcasters, mixed media zones, dedicated car park spaces and the location of that Outside Broadcast Compound (OBC). The rules also relate to radio and photography and the requirements to accommodate overseas broadcasting companies. As an example for a Premier League match televised live and in 3D, 33 cameras would be required and an additional 8 3D cameras. All of these will require multimedia and power connections provided by the Club"


And that, I think, is the essential difference from the initial application - 3D means a lot more space is required in the compound for a couple of extra lorries, so that needs to be incorporated into the amended application.

1747 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests

It is currently 19 Nov 2024 04:14