by St. Brynjar » 30 Dec 2013 18:15
by MmmMonsterMunch » 30 Dec 2013 18:48
RoyalBlue More seriously if, as some are suggesting, Adkins has lost the dressing room, then let's get rid of those players rather than the manager. Not many in the dressing room that we would really miss and/or couldn't be replaced.
by percy_freeman » 30 Dec 2013 19:37
I am liking this very much but we are more likely to get Colin Wakner in which case I would stop going after 45 years.....St. Brynjar If Adkins were to be (very harshly) sacked the only possible name I'd like is Clarke.
by Cureton's Volley » 30 Dec 2013 20:45
Royal Lady Anyway, my answer to the question would be McD with help from Sir Steve Coppell - they would be my dream team - can do wonders with a group of not very expensive players and both have an eye for a bargain who ends up making us money - what's not to like?
by Pseud O'Nym » 30 Dec 2013 20:59
by Cureton's Volley » 30 Dec 2013 21:14
MmmMonsterMunchRoyalBlue More seriously if, as some are suggesting, Adkins has lost the dressing room, then let's get rid of those players rather than the manager. Not many in the dressing room that we would really miss and/or couldn't be replaced.
Totally agree. I don't really have any 'connection' with the current set of players so may as well get shot & get some in that can actually string 3 passes together.
I gave this a lot of thought & in all seriousness who would we miss bar McCarthy? I would miss Jobi a bit perhaps but other than that I couldn't give a toss.
by Royal Lady » 31 Dec 2013 10:06
facaldaquiOilroyalfacaldaqui
But are you nursing a grudge that when the club went upmarket, they started hiring a better quality of motor?
No at all I'm happy for SJM and the possibility of new investment with this I can see him once again enjoying his stewardship of this great club. As for holding a grudge I stopped financial sponsorship a while back as I'm now in the oil industry and my company wouldn't benefit from the connection.
I was only joking. (Oil industry, eh? Ooooh!)
St. Brynjar If Adkins were to be (very harshly) sacked the only possible name I'd like is Clarke.
by Once were Biscuitmen » 31 Dec 2013 12:25
by Chuckle Brother » 31 Dec 2013 15:52
OilroyalThe Prisoner The team is in transition. Ownership all over the place. We have a load of injuries. We are in the top ten. We have potential. We have a manager with a proven track record. We have a manager who has only had one transfer window. We have a manager with a track record for producing intelligent teams who play the right way.
Despite all this, and with Adkins not even having had a full year the Football Manager brigade want a head on a stick.
I honestly despair of the instant gratification demanded by some of you mongs.
If anyone wants sacking it's you!
30 odd years of supporting this club. Also supplied youth team coach back in the elm park day, sponsored Shaka with a car, Dylon Kerr attended my wedding and I know SJM who asked me to be a patron of the club so I hardly think I'm looking for instant gratification
by Westwood52 » 31 Dec 2013 16:46
St. Brynjar If Adkins were to be (very harshly) sacked the only possible name I'd like is Clarke.
by Barry the bird boggler » 31 Dec 2013 16:54
by ZacNaloen » 31 Dec 2013 16:58
by facaldaqui » 31 Dec 2013 17:07
Barry the bird boggler It has been quoted elsewhere in this forum that NA was not happy on Sunday with what was on display and has said the issue is largely with a central midfield that is too slow to read and spot a forward pass.
If that assessment is correct then it's pretty damning for the likes of Guthrie although I would consider whoever plays in those roles is not helped by a lack of movement or intelligence from elsewhere in the team, a lack of confidence in whatever is masquerading as a back 4 on the day and incessant fiddling about in team selection/formation by the management further denying any hope of understanding ever bring developed.
by Ascotexgunner » 31 Dec 2013 17:27
The Prisoner The team is in transition. Ownership all over the place. We have a load of injuries. We are in the top ten. We have potential. We have a manager with a proven track record. We have a manager who has only had one transfer window. We have a manager with a track record for producing intelligent teams who play the right way.
Despite all this, and with Adkins not even having had a full year the Football Manager brigade want a head on a stick.
I honestly despair of the instant gratification demanded by some of you mongs.
If anyone wants sacking it's you!
by Platypuss » 31 Dec 2013 17:56
Westwood52 Sacking NA would not be harsh-on Sunday's evidence we are going backwards at a rate of knots-I was willing to give him my support last season but he has completely failed to bring anything positive to RFC-I agree though Clarke would be my choice also-he was very unfairly sacked by West Brom.
by Za Vas » 31 Dec 2013 18:23
by Chuckle Brother » 31 Dec 2013 19:05
Za Vas Not getting this whole Adkins out thing at all.
Yes it's a bit shit, but aren't we always shit in the run up to the new year?
by Rfc1987 » 04 Jan 2014 22:54
by andrew1957 » 04 Jan 2014 22:56
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 210 guests