by marlowuk » 17 Sep 2014 02:07
by Man Friday » 17 Sep 2014 06:50
marlowuk It's all about the three points
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 17 Sep 2014 07:01
by West Stand Man » 17 Sep 2014 07:22
Man Fridaymarlowuk It's all about the three points
Short term, yes; long term, no. Performances will eventually equate to points.
But full credit to Adkins and the players for our current position.
by leon » 17 Sep 2014 07:46
West Stand ManMan Fridaymarlowuk It's all about the three points
Short term, yes; long term, no. Performances will eventually equate to points.
But full credit to Adkins and the players for our current position.
Really, show me the column in the league table where the points are added for performance?
by Simon's Church » 17 Sep 2014 07:51
by SpaghettiHoop » 17 Sep 2014 07:57
by Jano » 17 Sep 2014 07:58
by leon » 17 Sep 2014 08:06
Jano Well, we were lucky to get away with that one. Looked good for the first twenty minutes, looked awful for the next 70. Very very poor defensively highlighted by Gunter being turned inside and out all night long. On the plus side it does make for some interesting games this season as we can, in patches, look very good going forward. I have to start by saying I didn't see Saturday's game so it seems to me that result and the performances that went with it seem to me very much down to the quality of opponent and the sending off.
I expected to see something more from Norwood, who does look like he can pick a pass and does move the ball around quickly, but seemed very much on a periphery of the game last night, I actually thought Akpan looked the more comfortable of the two. I also expected more from Murray, and although it was nice to see us winning a couple of the crosses, he didn't hold up the ball any better than Pog for me. For a big guy (not actually sure he's bigger than Pog!) he seemed to get bossed by their centre backs for most of the evening, although he does stay on his feet which is a bonus I guess. Blackman did ok, nice run for the goal and well taken penalty but didn't seem to get involved too much after. Wasn't as much of a willing runner as Taylor is. Mackie clearly pulled up early in the second half so I'm guessing he picked up a strain of some sort, but also didn't get involved enough for me. Cox was undoubtedly the star of the evening and Federici pulled off a few great saves and then ruined it by flapping about like Dumbo for their second goal.
We were very fortunate that Millwall were actually worse in defence than we were.
by Reading4eva » 17 Sep 2014 08:33
by ayjaydee » 17 Sep 2014 08:33
Simon's Church Hector motm yet again, hasn't put a foot wrong since he came into the side.
by 3points » 17 Sep 2014 08:37
leon Gunter looks like he's going backwards. But we can score goals.
by Stuka » 17 Sep 2014 08:40
by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 17 Sep 2014 08:45
Stuka Can Reading finish 2nd? I think Nottingham Forest will be champs and Reading finish 2nd.
by tidus_mi2 » 17 Sep 2014 08:59
by CayeneMatt » 17 Sep 2014 09:07
Reading4eva I think people are forgetting Millwall are a decent side, by no means prolific but I feel they could be one of the teams who make up the playoffs.
As for us, I fancy us to do something. Get Williams or Karacan back (or put in Kuhl again) where Akpan is and we could be onto a winner. McCleary coming back would be a godsend. Norwood is better than Guthrie in every department.
A good team doesn't win when playing well, they win when playing substandard/poorly
by melonhead » 17 Sep 2014 09:13
by leww_rfc » 17 Sep 2014 09:16
Who Moved The Goalposts?Stuka Can Reading finish 2nd? I think Nottingham Forest will be champs and Reading finish 2nd.
Hmmm. Think Forest won't last the pace - at the moment it's hard to see past Norwich as champions.
by Sanguine » 17 Sep 2014 09:17
Big Ern Things are looking 1000 times better than they were this time 12 months ago and credit is due to Adkins for sticking with it as he is now starting to put a half decent team together.
by LoyalRoyal22 » 17 Sep 2014 09:29