by RoyalChicagoFC »
19 Feb 2007 14:09
Colour coded for the purpose of some sorely-needed clarity...
RoyalChicagoFC 2 world wars, 1 world cup And I just happen not to be a fan of Bikey personally: always makes me nervous.
I quite like him, myself. He's still got plenty of learning to do, but he'll have ample opportunity to continue to learn on the job.
On the other hand, a glance at the highlights loop from Saturday reveals that he got away with plenty, not least of all
when he was bailed out by the lino on Solskjaer's disallowed goal and
again by Federici after Larsson ghosted in for Ronaldo's goalward chip.
There are other missteps on there as well. Point being, the full-time score is the only thing
that spared him an unmitigated hiding for his performance on Saturday --but, as I said, I still like the guy and think he'll continue to improve.
Talking out of the hole between his arse cheeks as always, the class pedant stupidly He wouldn't have got a hiding, what are you on about?
Answer: Among other things...
zac naloen Pretty much every breakthrough they made was because Bikey was half heartedly marking someone.
But this was against World Class players, which he certainly isn't, so I suppose he can be let off. Plus he got away with it.
In a customarily clever retort, the class pedant then Do you two actually go to any football matches?
Answering solely for myself: No, but it's evident that I can watch a highlights loop --
this one, which clocks in at 7:38 (and which YouTube had taken down by the time I chimed in on the subject last evening, alas, but for now it's viewable again)-- and draw the same conclusions as another, because (as previously mentioned)...
Stranded If Solskjaer's goal had stood (as it should have) he would have got serious stick on here.
And another (again, as previously mentioned)...
Vision He also went to sleep for Larssons's chance which Federici somehow saved.
Ergo, and in sum, I seem to've been "on about" the things that I --and at least three others-- saw through a working pair of eyes.
With that, I shall await the class pedant's next rhetorical challenge --which, if past performance is anything to go on, will come in the form of a(n ungrammatical) correction of an innocent spelling error attributable to nothing more than hurried typing and rushed proofreading on my part.
Should be a thoroughly constructive use of everyone's time as usual, I'm sure.