by Hoop Blah » 10 Sep 2010 13:39
by sheshnu » 10 Sep 2010 13:45
by roadrunner » 10 Sep 2010 18:02
rabidbeeroadrunner It certainly doesn't make sense bringing him in on trial with a view to a permanent deal when McDermott says we already have enough players that can play in that position. Odd.
Until McD saw him on trial, how could he really judge whether Hendrie was better than what we already have?
by rabidbee » 11 Sep 2010 00:02
roadrunnerrabidbeeroadrunner It certainly doesn't make sense bringing him in on trial with a view to a permanent deal when McDermott says we already have enough players that can play in that position. Odd.
Until McD saw him on trial, how could he really judge whether Hendrie was better than what we already have?
McDermott was quoted as saying we didn't need Hendrie because we have enough players who can play in his position, not that we had 'better' players in that position. If he'd said the latter I wouldn't question bringing the lad in on trial.
by glass half full » 11 Sep 2010 03:11
by From Despair To Where? » 11 Sep 2010 09:18
Jeffers217
I agree, we definately have more of a team spirit about us at the moment which is good but you hit the nail on the head when you said it comes down to the quality of the players which is something we do lack. Yes we are better than Palace and Leicester as a whole but then they have players we don't have. Palace have Ambrose (admittedly not playing 2moro) who can hit a good few goals from centre mid- we don't have one of those now. Leicester have Fryatt who's gonna score goals, again we lack a prolific striker. What good is it in having a really good defence, if we have no one who can score goals to win the games?!
by dean horrix legend » 17 Sep 2010 16:05
by Royal With Cheese » 18 Sep 2010 23:56
dean horrix legend Hendrie has signed for Bradford City on a short term deal,
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 190 guests