by Winchester Royal » 10 Feb 2014 09:11
by RoyalBlue » 10 Feb 2014 09:21
Nameless I've watched that over and over and it's impossible to make a decision based on the angle. You can guess, which I suspect is what the ref did. The linesman should have had an excellent angle but he didn't give a pen.
Gorkss gets to the ball just about as Afobe goes down, and it looks like the ball was always too far ahead of Afobe for him to have had a shot.
I agree that in he early stages of the tussle Afobe just used his strength, whereas from my live view I was sure he had fouled Pearce
It would be interesting to know if the ref thought the pen was for holding or a trip. The way Afobe goes down I suspect Pearce my have just clipped his heel although not intentionally. A trip is a trip though, whether you intend it or not.
by paddy20 » 10 Feb 2014 09:30
Walkley_OwlWoodcote Royal My first game since September and, despite the result (not to mention being one of Adkins strongest critics) I left seriously impressed with both the team and its manager's performance on one of those inevitable days in the course of a long season when, sh*t happens.
As Pearce sloped off after seeing red, I said to my neighbour "That's Alf done for the afternoon"
Before Adkins saw the light and adopted the McDermott approach of getting the very best out of available resources whatever it takes, Le Fondre would have been sat next to Pearce within minutes. The fact the manager elected to retain our Championship player of the month in such adversity should give us all much hope for the rest of the season.
Playing a man short at this level for 80 minutes is a very tall order and, to state the blindingly obvious, something has to give. We needed at least one goal to get anything from the game and with just an ounce of luck here or there we would have succeeded. I thought our "10" covered the ground amazingly well right to the final whistle and the 2 strikers insured Wedneday always had something think about in defence. Meanwhile, the pace of Obita and McCleary at full back meant they could get forward from time to time to good effect and half way through the second half our heavily worked central midfield was swapped for fresh legs. Yes, this all made us more direct and, yes, some tired legs misplaced a few passes but as a means to play almost an entire match one man and one goal down, it was nothing short of impressive ..........................what do some of you want, blood
With 11 men on the pitch we would have wiped the floor with a simply dire Wednesday, whose first half negativity beggared belief at times. What I didn't understand was everyone getting so upset with their time wasting. Whenever one of their players elected to give us a breather by rolling on the floor for a few minutes rather than running us into the ground with their numerical advantage, I was saying "Thanks very much"
With the benefit of subsequent media, in my view Pearce appears to have been somewhat clumsy and a tad naïve but this is a sh*t rule that we have benefited from in the past and one most centre halves succumb to more than once in their career. As an eminent Northern Royal observed as we left the Upper West, conceding a penalty and losing a man for the rest of the match in these situations is tantamount to double jeopardy.
Sh*t happens but FINALLY I'm looking forward to seeing this team perform with a full compliment and looking infinitely more effective than just a few weeks ago ............................better late than never, Nige!
I'm sorry but that is crap, we did a job, yes we were helped by the dismissal but in the 2nd period we controlled the game, you had 0 shots on target!
by RoyalBlue » 10 Feb 2014 09:36
Huckleberry HoundRoyalBlue Right, so there has been absolutely no mention of the appalling weather, localised flooding (yes, even in the Reading area) over the past few days?! And no mention of the traffic problems in the Mad Stad area from at least midday onwards? What's more from the moment Adie and co were on air they were telling people to leave early for the game due to the problems.
I checked the AA website at midday & the only problems on the M4 at the time were eastbound at J5. Was on the approach to J11 just after two o'clock, but missed the first five minutes of the game.
.
by creative_username_1 » 10 Feb 2014 09:59
by Walkley_Owl » 10 Feb 2014 10:00
paddy20Walkley_OwlWoodcote Royal My first game since September and, despite the result (not to mention being one of Adkins strongest critics) I left seriously impressed with both the team and its manager's performance on one of those inevitable days in the course of a long season when, sh*t happens.
As Pearce sloped off after seeing red, I said to my neighbour "That's Alf done for the afternoon"
Before Adkins saw the light and adopted the McDermott approach of getting the very best out of available resources whatever it takes, Le Fondre would have been sat next to Pearce within minutes. The fact the manager elected to retain our Championship player of the month in such adversity should give us all much hope for the rest of the season.
Playing a man short at this level for 80 minutes is a very tall order and, to state the blindingly obvious, something has to give. We needed at least one goal to get anything from the game and with just an ounce of luck here or there we would have succeeded. I thought our "10" covered the ground amazingly well right to the final whistle and the 2 strikers insured Wedneday always had something think about in defence. Meanwhile, the pace of Obita and McCleary at full back meant they could get forward from time to time to good effect and half way through the second half our heavily worked central midfield was swapped for fresh legs. Yes, this all made us more direct and, yes, some tired legs misplaced a few passes but as a means to play almost an entire match one man and one goal down, it was nothing short of impressive ..........................what do some of you want, blood
With 11 men on the pitch we would have wiped the floor with a simply dire Wednesday, whose first half negativity beggared belief at times. What I didn't understand was everyone getting so upset with their time wasting. Whenever one of their players elected to give us a breather by rolling on the floor for a few minutes rather than running us into the ground with their numerical advantage, I was saying "Thanks very much"
With the benefit of subsequent media, in my view Pearce appears to have been somewhat clumsy and a tad naïve but this is a sh*t rule that we have benefited from in the past and one most centre halves succumb to more than once in their career. As an eminent Northern Royal observed as we left the Upper West, conceding a penalty and losing a man for the rest of the match in these situations is tantamount to double jeopardy.
Sh*t happens but FINALLY I'm looking forward to seeing this team perform with a full compliment and looking infinitely more effective than just a few weeks ago ............................better late than never, Nige!
I'm sorry but that is crap, we did a job, yes we were helped by the dismissal but in the 2nd period we controlled the game, you had 0 shots on target!
Have to say you looked a very good team. If you hadn't had a bad start I'm sure you would be up there challenging. Thought sending off was harsh but tug on shirt was there so probably a penalty. Just wish refs could make up their minds on whether shirt tugging is a foul or not. They are never given at
corners! I think it would have been a tight game with 11 v 11 but based on the chances we were creating beforehand I think we may have just edged it.
by stealthpapes » 10 Feb 2014 10:06
MmmMonsterMunchfloyd__streeteAgent Balti All the moaners on BBC Berks blaming Adkins for this result need a reality check.
0-2 down with more than 30 mins left we then resorted to hitting diagonals towards Pog and Kirkland didn't have a shot to save. Adkins can take the blame for that, if not the many individual mistakes made by the players he (allegedly) coaches during the week.
So you're blaming Adkins for Pearce's red card?
Ok then
by loyalroyal4life » 10 Feb 2014 10:38
by Extended-Phenotype » 10 Feb 2014 10:58
sandmanbcubedsandman Ah a loss, must be time to have a go at Jobi.
Not really he's been the weak link in last few games IMO, the one player I would have thought about changing
He usually flatters to deceive but yesterday he didn't even bother with the flattering, hence the negative comments from quite a number on here
No, sorry, just no. He has not been the weak link in the last few games at all in fact if it wasn't for him and the security he gives I doubt Obita would have taken to left back as well as he has.
by Wycombe Royal » 10 Feb 2014 11:14
Walkley_Owl I do think you'd have beaten us had it been a less controversial start but considering we had 5 centre backs out and played a midfielder at centre half I thought we nullified the threat of ALF and POG after a shaky beginning, we have pace and width in the side which causes plenty of problems and in Kieran Lee we have a midfielder who can almost do it all but goes unnoticed.
by Walkley_Owl » 10 Feb 2014 11:28
Wycombe RoyalWalkley_Owl I do think you'd have beaten us had it been a less controversial start but considering we had 5 centre backs out and played a midfielder at centre half I thought we nullified the threat of ALF and POG after a shaky beginning, we have pace and width in the side which causes plenty of problems and in Kieran Lee we have a midfielder who can almost do it all but goes unnoticed.
You didn't nullify the threat of Pog and ALF, the ref did that for you.
by Wycombe Royal » 10 Feb 2014 11:37
Walkley_OwlWycombe RoyalWalkley_Owl I do think you'd have beaten us had it been a less controversial start but considering we had 5 centre backs out and played a midfielder at centre half I thought we nullified the threat of ALF and POG after a shaky beginning, we have pace and width in the side which causes plenty of problems and in Kieran Lee we have a midfielder who can almost do it all but goes unnoticed.
You didn't nullify the threat of Pog and ALF, the ref did that for you.
Not really, the ref hindered you but you left two up top and they simply didn't work hard enough, 0 shots on target.
by royals pete » 10 Feb 2014 11:49
by Walkley_Owl » 10 Feb 2014 11:53
Wycombe Royal Playing with 10 men for 80 minutes and an opposition team who had a player go down injured whenever we tried to break it hardly surprising is it? I think you need to look at the first 7 minutes to see the shape the game was taking before the ref intervened.
by Swanny1871 » 10 Feb 2014 11:58
by creative_username_1 » 10 Feb 2014 11:58
Walkley_OwlWycombe Royal Playing with 10 men for 80 minutes and an opposition team who had a player go down injured whenever we tried to break it hardly surprising is it? I think you need to look at the first 7 minutes to see the shape the game was taking before the ref intervened.
Did you have a shot on target in the first 7 minutes? No.
by winchester_royal » 10 Feb 2014 12:04
Walkley_OwlWycombe Royal Playing with 10 men for 80 minutes and an opposition team who had a player go down injured whenever we tried to break it hardly surprising is it? I think you need to look at the first 7 minutes to see the shape the game was taking before the ref intervened.
Did you have a shot on target in the first 7 minutes? No.
by Wycombe Royal » 10 Feb 2014 12:08
Walkley_OwlWycombe Royal Playing with 10 men for 80 minutes and an opposition team who had a player go down injured whenever we tried to break it hardly surprising is it? I think you need to look at the first 7 minutes to see the shape the game was taking before the ref intervened.
Did you have a shot on target in the first 7 minutes? No.
by Walkley_Owl » 10 Feb 2014 12:13
Wycombe RoyalWalkley_OwlWycombe Royal Playing with 10 men for 80 minutes and an opposition team who had a player go down injured whenever we tried to break it hardly surprising is it? I think you need to look at the first 7 minutes to see the shape the game was taking before the ref intervened.
Did you have a shot on target in the first 7 minutes? No.
Forced Kirkland into making a very good save from ALF as he was going round him and then another cleared 2 yards from the line after Pog had attempted to be honest and stay on his feet when challenged by three of your players. It's not all about shots on target. Obviously if it was Afobe in the same position as Pog he would have gone down, won a penalty and got a player sent off.
Honesty wins you nothing these days.
by Maguire » 10 Feb 2014 12:13
Users browsing this forum: ankeny, Jammy Dodger and 260 guests