by bigmike » 15 Jul 2010 09:29
by wolsey » 15 Jul 2010 10:27
by RoyalChicagoFC » 22 Oct 2010 19:35
Above herein on 30th June 2009, Carlin20
All is fine at Pompey.
I think it's more of a will Reading or southampton go out of business first?
by ankeny » 22 Oct 2010 20:06
by Millsy » 22 Oct 2010 20:33
by Percy's Rocket » 22 Oct 2010 20:41
by RoyalBlue » 22 Oct 2010 21:40
Percy's Rocket I fully agree about the pain for their fans but what an object lesson in not living beyond your means..they got similar crowds to us in the prem I think but tried to employ at salaries which were totally unrealistic and so owe the inland revenue.. (ie us the taxpayer) a vast amount. Madman winds us all up but the conclusions are obvious.
by southstand67 » 22 Oct 2010 21:56
by roadrunner » 22 Oct 2010 22:00
2 world wars, 1 world cup Much as I think they're idiots for gazumping us to get Tommy Smith especially when they couldn't bloody afford it, it's never nice to see a club go under.
by Millsy » 22 Oct 2010 22:17
RoyalBluePercy's Rocket I fully agree about the pain for their fans but what an object lesson in not living beyond your means..they got similar crowds to us in the prem I think but tried to employ at salaries which were totally unrealistic and so owe the inland revenue.. (ie us the taxpayer) a vast amount. Madman winds us all up but the conclusions are obvious.
No they're sodding not. There is an absolutely massive gulf between the approach that Porstmouth adopted and that being followed by the bullsh*tting (genuine PL ambition, my *rse) Madejski.
All many supporters want is an approach somewhere in the middle of that gulf. If Madejski isn't prepared to walk his big mouthed talk and move to that midpoint, he should accept what the market feels that the club is worth, rather than what he in his dreams/arrogance thinks it's worth, and walk away.
by Arch » 23 Oct 2010 02:00
by Wimb » 23 Oct 2010 07:29
Arch What "we" do is adopt a very conservative strategy that you may or may not agree with. But let's not represent it as some kind of opposite extreme of insanity from Portsmouth. Our strategy makes us less competitive in the Championship than you might reasonably think we could or even should be. How competitive has their strategy made them if they don't exist this time next week?
To continue the incontinent spewing about Madejski as though he's comparable in some inverted way to Gaydamak, Storrie, Chanrai, Andronikou, etc is really utterly daft. Can't you criticize the club's policy without splattering us all with your diarrhoea?
by Millsy » 23 Oct 2010 11:28
Arch What "we" do is adopt a very conservative strategy that you may or may not agree with. But let's not represent it as some kind of opposite extreme of insanity from Portsmouth. Our strategy makes us less competitive in the Championship than you might reasonably think we could or even should be. How competitive has their strategy made them if they don't exist this time next week?
To continue the incontinent spewing about Madejski as though he's comparable in some inverted way to Gaydamak, Storrie, Chanrai, Andronikou, etc is really utterly daft. Can't you criticize the club's policy without splattering us all with your diarrhoea?
by RoyalBlue » 23 Oct 2010 11:59
by Elmer Park » 23 Oct 2010 13:31
by RoyalChicagoFC » 23 Oct 2010 13:44
by Arch » 23 Oct 2010 13:53
2 world wars, 1 world cupArch What "we" do is adopt a very conservative strategy that you may or may not agree with. But let's not represent it as some kind of opposite extreme of insanity from Portsmouth. Our strategy makes us less competitive in the Championship than you might reasonably think we could or even should be. How competitive has their strategy made them if they don't exist this time next week?
To continue the incontinent spewing about Madejski as though he's comparable in some inverted way to Gaydamak, Storrie, Chanrai, Andronikou, etc is really utterly daft. Can't you criticize the club's policy without splattering us all with your diarrhoea?
Can't you take reasonable arguments/criticisms that you happen not to like without becoming offensive?
Read my post again and please tell me where I say our situation is an opposite extreme from Portsmouth. The whole point of my post is that pointing to any extreme (be it Pompey or Chelsea) is daft. Therefore I fully agree with your post.
by Svlad Cjelli » 23 Oct 2010 13:56
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests