RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

353 posts
Deathy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3998
Joined: 01 Sep 2008 08:45

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Deathy » 17 Jun 2009 12:30

brendywendy
rg6royal ahhh just imagine if we had lescott and mensah 8)


with a midfield of brown and matejovski........


Just imagine a team that played with the same heart they did in our first season in the Premiership. No need for these Mensah's and Brown's then.

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by brendywendy » 17 Jun 2009 12:53

so its the heart s fault now is it?

User avatar
Mike Hunt
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2812
Joined: 01 Jul 2008 08:24
Location: Blue and White

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Mike Hunt » 28 Jun 2009 08:45

May be QPR bound ?

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... -21477346/

Southampton could this week be forced to sell exEngland Under-21 midfielder Andrew Surman this week just to meet the club's wage bill.

Qpr are expected to head a queue of clubs willing to pay a cut-price £400,000 for the 22-year-old who has made 133 appearances for the Saints.

Administrator Mark Fry was unable to pay any of the club'staff their June salaries on Thursday after a takeover deal with the Matt Le Tissier-fronted Pinnacle Group broke down.

And while a group of Swiss investors are now considering a £15million bid for Saints, Fry is under pressure from two directions to complete a deal in the week.

While they remain unpaid, any member of Saints staff or players could call in the receivers to close the club down. And time is fast running out for Saints to convince the League that they have a new owner in place and the finances to compete in League One when the new season starts in August.

And there was a hint of desperation from Fry.

He said: "If towards the end of the week we are in a situation where no bids for the football club are forthcoming, then I will meet with the directors of the club to discuss options."



Common Reading - get on that sh!t

Dennis the Butler
Member
Posts: 176
Joined: 10 May 2006 19:13
Location: Wallowing in the Premiership glory ... oh bollox !!

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Dennis the Butler » 28 Jun 2009 09:06

C,mon ... this is Reading ... horse bolted ... gate open ... springs to mind !!

hutch
Member
Posts: 229
Joined: 21 May 2008 16:44
Location: Actually my name`s Marina.

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by hutch » 29 Jun 2009 10:36

Come on Reading, pull your finger out for christs sake, 400 grand for a proven player,tipped by many to be a hell of a player,its criminal if we don`t even make a bid for him. I`ve heard he`s a bit of a homebird and doesn`t want to leave the Southampton area, fair enough but Reading is closer to home than QPR, he could even commute every day from Southampton if need be.
400 grand? Come on!!


Sun Tzu
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3996
Joined: 08 Oct 2008 10:00

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Sun Tzu » 29 Jun 2009 11:54

He will cost a lot more than 400k !

His agent will know that and his signing on fee / wages will have risen to soak up the available cash. Simply means Southampton get less of the money and he gets more.

Scarface
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1050
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:59
Location: I Love Spacecruiser

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Scarface » 29 Jun 2009 11:56

it would be absolutely criminal if we don't at least make a bid.

Sun Tzu
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3996
Joined: 08 Oct 2008 10:00

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Sun Tzu » 29 Jun 2009 11:58

Why ?

Would be a waste of time if he's going somewhere else.

Or if Rogers doesn't want him.

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6682
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Wycombe Royal » 29 Jun 2009 12:04

Scarface it would be absolutely criminal if we don't at least make a bid.

What law would we be breaking?


User avatar
FiNeRaIn
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6231
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 17:44
Location: Los Angeles

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by FiNeRaIn » 29 Jun 2009 13:00

Wycombe Royal
Scarface it would be absolutely criminal if we don't at least make a bid.

What law would we be breaking?



The law of " stupidity", we need a player of his class. We should snap the trio up IMO. Mcgoldrick, lallana and surman. Good players.

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6682
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Wycombe Royal » 29 Jun 2009 13:03

FiNeRaIn
Wycombe Royal
Scarface it would be absolutely criminal if we don't at least make a bid.

What law would we be breaking?



The law of " stupidity", we need a player of his class. We should snap the trio up IMO. Mcgoldrick, lallana and surman. Good players.

You said it would be "criminal" - so what "criminal" law would we be breaking? I don't remember hearing about anyone being charged for being stupid. :wink:

Why would we want to be raiding a club that was relegated from the Championship? Normally the negative people on here would be claiming what little ambition that shows.........

User avatar
Row Z Royal
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 10365
Joined: 07 Jan 2006 20:01
Location: LOLandmarks come and go. There'll only ever be one "Clickety Clique"

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Row Z Royal » 29 Jun 2009 13:16

FiNeRaIn
Wycombe Royal
Scarface it would be absolutely criminal if we don't at least make a bid.

What law would we be breaking?



The law of " stupidity", we need a player of his class. We should snap the trio up IMO. Mcgoldrick, lallana and surman. Good players.


Lallana should be signed for one reason and one reason alone: LOLaLOLLOLana

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Platypuss » 29 Jun 2009 14:11

FiNeRaIn
Wycombe Royal
Scarface it would be absolutely criminal if we don't at least make a bid.

What law would we be breaking?



The law of " stupidity", we need a player of his class. We should snap the trio up IMO. Mcgoldrick, lallana and surman. Good players.


McGoldrick gone to Forest by the looks of it.


User avatar
rg6royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3734
Joined: 17 Aug 2006 22:38
Location: Lowers

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by rg6royal » 29 Jun 2009 15:49

Yeah saw that on BBC, was one of the players I thought would be a excellent signing for Reading. Forest splashing out £1m showing ambition.

Sun Tzu
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3996
Joined: 08 Oct 2008 10:00

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Sun Tzu » 29 Jun 2009 15:51

rg6royal Yeah saw that on BBC, was one of the players I thought would be a excellent signing for Reading. Forest splashing out £1m showing ambition.


Well when you've been as rubbish as them for the last few years you start getting desperate !
Are you suggesting we should follow the Forest path to success ?

User avatar
Southbank Old Boy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1954
Joined: 15 Aug 2006 18:42

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Southbank Old Boy » 29 Jun 2009 15:56

The Saints youngsters are all pretty good, with Surman and Lallana being the pick of the bunch from what I've seen

Just because they got relegated doesn't mean those youngsters aren't any good and wont flourish in a better team with the right players around them to compliment them

If Surman is going for that sort of price I would really hope we were in there fighting for his services as he is a genuinely good player and has a peach of a left foot. Rodgers might not fancy him, or think we need to get a player in for the positions he can play, but I would be surprised if that were the case

My only real worry would be that we look like having a young side already with our own youngsters tipped to play a bigger role under Rodgers. That might mean we wont really be looking for younger players from elsewhere as every side needs a blend of youth and experience

User avatar
Southbank Old Boy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1954
Joined: 15 Aug 2006 18:42

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Southbank Old Boy » 29 Jun 2009 16:19

Wycombe Royal
Scarface it would be absolutely criminal if we don't at least make a bid.

What law would we be breaking?


Do you have NHA? aspergers WR?

Criminal is a turn of phrase as well you know :roll:

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6682
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Wycombe Royal » 29 Jun 2009 16:39

Southbank Old Boy
Wycombe Royal
Scarface it would be absolutely criminal if we don't at least make a bid.

What law would we be breaking?


Do you have NHA? aspergers WR?

Criminal is a turn of phrase as well you know :roll:

None of the above, just being argumentative and an all round annoying twat today. It helps the day pass quicker, especially when someone like AP bites.......

Terminal Boardom
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7791
Joined: 15 Aug 2008 19:50
Location: No more egodome until the daft old coot leaves

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Terminal Boardom » 29 Jun 2009 18:44

Wycombe Royal None of the above, just being argumentative and an all round annoying twat today.


What's so different about today? :lol:

Terminal Boardom
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7791
Joined: 15 Aug 2008 19:50
Location: No more egodome until the daft old coot leaves

Re: Andrew Surman

by Terminal Boardom » 29 Jun 2009 18:45

Terminal Boardom
gazzer, loyal royal would prefer mcgoldrick

13 goals from midfield in a team that got relegated


So McGoldrick, Surman and Lallana or whatever his name is are supposed to be half decent and worth a punt? If they are so o*ford good, how come southampton got relegated?


I think my post from 30 April still stands.

353 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests

It is currently 29 Nov 2024 17:38