RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

525 posts
User avatar
Rawlie19
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 1930
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:16
Location: Nepal

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by Rawlie19 » 17 Jul 2009 14:48

Royal Rother Quite how that has enabled him to reach 1500 posts (or whatever) is incredible, but as you rightly say, he is an argumentative sod!!

He posts a point...

User avatar
Rawlie19
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 1930
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:16
Location: Nepal

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by Rawlie19 » 17 Jul 2009 14:49

...Then he posts it again straight away in saying slightly different stuff...

User avatar
Rawlie19
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 1930
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:16
Location: Nepal

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by Rawlie19 » 17 Jul 2009 14:49

...Then for good measure he'll hammer it home once more...

User avatar
Rawlie19
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 1930
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:16
Location: Nepal

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by Rawlie19 » 17 Jul 2009 14:49

...And there you go. 4 posts, all making the same point, within a minute.

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20777
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by Snowball » 17 Jul 2009 15:00

It's called rhetoric.

I could try to get down to your level, I suppose.


User avatar
Rawlie19
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 1930
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:16
Location: Nepal

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by Rawlie19 » 17 Jul 2009 15:26

This post was made by Snowball who is currently on your ignore list. Display this post.

User avatar
Geekins
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2477
Joined: 07 Aug 2007 12:33
Location: Back on a kayak

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by Geekins » 17 Jul 2009 15:29

Rawlie19 This post was made by Snowball who is currently on your ignore list. Display this post.

He said... "It's called rhetoric. I could try to get down to your level, I suppose."

:lol: :wink:

User avatar
bigmike
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1497
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 00:33

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by bigmike » 17 Jul 2009 15:33

Oh dear looks like this thread has decended in to


User avatar
Rawlie19
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 1930
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:16
Location: Nepal

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by Rawlie19 » 17 Jul 2009 15:35

Geekins
Rawlie19 This post was made by Snowball who is currently on your ignore list. Display this post.

He said... "It's called rhetoric. I could try to get down to your level, I suppose."

:lol: :wink:

yes, and my post was made to clarify that I don't care :wink:


User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by brendywendy » 17 Jul 2009 15:58

im not assigning blame for this thread, or the reported thread

but this is the gayest thing ive ever read

stop it.

Terminal Boardom
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7791
Joined: 15 Aug 2008 19:50
Location: No more egodome until the daft old coot leaves

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by Terminal Boardom » 17 Jul 2009 16:46

"There are lies, damned lies, and statistics" Benjamin Disraeli

Look, everyone is right ok? Just kiss and make up ffs.

Stats have their place but are not the be all and end all otherwise Snowflake's sex life could be very interesting. I can imagine the conversation?

Mrs S - That was great darling
Mr S - Thats the 27th time that you have orgasmed inside 16 minutes and the 452nd time that I have orgasmed within 5 minutes or so as you my little pumpkin. Have I shown you my graph justifying that Shane Long is actually, minute by minute, a better prospect for Reading up front than anyone else?

Sorry if this causes offence but I am bored of this. I only check this thread to see how much more vomit inducing bollox has been written.

User avatar
Vision
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5129
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 20:53

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by Vision » 17 Jul 2009 16:55

Terminal Boardom "There are lies, damned lies, and statistics" Benjamin Disraeli

Look, everyone is right ok? Just kiss and make up ffs.

Stats have their place but are not the be all and end all otherwise Snowflake's sex life could be very interesting. I can imagine the conversation?

Mrs S - That was great darling
Mr S - Thats the 27th time that you have orgasmed inside 16 minutes and the 452nd time that I have orgasmed within 5 minutes or so as you my little pumpkin. Have I shown you my graph justifying that Shane Long is actually, minute by minute, a better prospect for Reading up front than anyone else?

Sorry if this causes offence but I am bored of this. I only check this thread to see how much more vomit inducing bollox has been written.


LOL. It never disappoints does it?

User avatar
Maguire
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12094
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:26

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by Maguire » 17 Jul 2009 17:14

Christ, a good reminder as to why I don't read this board. How to ruin a thread 1.01


Super_horns
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1004
Joined: 22 Sep 2004 09:19
Location: Harpeden

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by Super_horns » 17 Jul 2009 17:36

No Smith for either of our friendlies tomorrow..club say he is injured but make of that what you will.

User avatar
One Beer is never enough.
Member
Posts: 607
Joined: 13 Aug 2005 17:26
Location: X - None of the Above

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by One Beer is never enough. » 17 Jul 2009 17:49

Super_horns No Smith for either of our friendlies tomorrow..club say he is injured but make of that what you will.


Dave Kitson was 'injured' became for our friendlies at the start of last year.............. If your club say he's injured, I'm sure he is. Mr Russo wouldnt want anything to reflect on his integrity, would he?

User avatar
bigmike
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1497
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 00:33

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by bigmike » 17 Jul 2009 17:58

One Beer is never enough.
Super_horns No Smith for either of our friendlies tomorrow..club say he is injured but make of that what you will.


Dave Kitson was 'injured' became for our friendlies at the start of last year.............. If your club say he's injured, I'm sure he is. Mr Russo wouldnt want anything to reflect on his integrity, would he?



LMAO

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20777
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by Snowball » 17 Jul 2009 18:25

Terminal Boardom "There are lies, damned lies, and statistics" Benjamin Disraeli

Look, everyone is right ok? Just kiss and make up ffs.

Stats have their place but are not the be all and end all otherwise Snowflake's sex life could be very interesting. I can imagine the conversation?

Mrs S - That was great darling
Mr S - Thats the 27th time that you have orgasmed inside 16 minutes and the 452nd time that I have orgasmed within 5 minutes or so as you my little pumpkin. Have I shown you my graph justifying that Shane Long is actually, minute by minute, a better prospect for Reading up front than anyone else?

Sorry if this causes offence but I am bored of this. I only check this thread to see how much more vomit inducing bollox has been written.



My Mrs asks, "What's an orgasm?"

Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20777
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by Snowball » 17 Jul 2009 18:26

Maguire Christ, a good reminder as to why I don't read this board. How to ruin a thread 1.01



How do you know?

User avatar
bigmike
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1497
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 00:33

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by bigmike » 17 Jul 2009 18:33

Does posting 1522 posts in just over 6 months make you a professional writer???

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: RUMOUR - Tommy Smith

by Ian Royal » 17 Jul 2009 19:34

Snowball
Ian Royal
Royal Rother The logical conclusion is to accept that his meaning of "a million or so" is different to most other people's.

Why do we choose not to accept others' statements about their own beliefs / values / interpretations etc.? It would truly be a bizarre thing to lie about - far better just to accept it and move on imho.


I have accepted that snowball believes a million or so = £750k/£800k - £1.something million.

Hence why I said if he'd just explained that, to my honest (if slightly barbed) question, all of this could have been avoided. He'd still be wrong about that interpretation, as evidenced by just about everyone disagreeing with his interpretation, but his post would have made much more sense.

Instead he went off on one trying to spin what he'd said as it was handily vague, to get at me.

I'm happy to leave it there as I've said several times already. I just don't feel like I should step back and allow others to misinterpret me, like you appear to me, to have just done.



I didn't "spin" anything. I just repeated my personal beliefs. YOU are the stalker.

If the beer in a pub is £1:75 to £2:25 that, to me, is "The beer is a coupla quid or so."



Give me the Goddamn address of that Pub now!

I was just paying £3.00 a pint.

525 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests

It is currently 19 Nov 2024 20:19