by Ian Royal » 11 Aug 2012 02:17
by Royalwaster » 11 Aug 2012 08:42
by gazzer, loyal royal » 11 Aug 2012 08:55
Royalwaster Unlike Stevie Coppell - MrMad gave him £10million and he spent a fiver ...
by Hampshire Royal » 11 Aug 2012 10:07
TheSiege See the Lukaku thread, which should be subsumed into this one. They both incorrectly think that Long may return to us! We can do much better if we are still prepared to spend money.
by Extended-Phenotype » 11 Aug 2012 10:23
Hampshire RoyalTheSiege See the Lukaku thread, which should be subsumed into this one. They both incorrectly think that Long may return to us! We can do much better if we are still prepared to spend money.
Seems odd to use 'subsumed' when talking about threads speculating on Long and Lukaku. Surely you mean the threads should be merged, unless you think that the signing of Long would be bigger thsn the signing of Lukaku. To my mind, I would simply have said 'merged' but if I found it necessary to use 'subsumed' I might have suggested that the Long thread should be subsumed into the Lukaku thread. But I'm not a prententious little prick who seems to want to show his 'superior knowledge' by using words that are a little bit different to the words used by us 'normal' people.
by RockheadRumple » 11 Aug 2012 16:03
Extended-PhenotypeHampshire RoyalTheSiege See the Lukaku thread, which should be subsumed into this one. They both incorrectly think that Long may return to us! We can do much better if we are still prepared to spend money.
Seems odd to use 'subsumed' when talking about threads speculating on Long and Lukaku. Surely you mean the threads should be merged, unless you think that the signing of Long would be bigger thsn the signing of Lukaku. To my mind, I would simply have said 'merged' but if I found it necessary to use 'subsumed' I might have suggested that the Long thread should be subsumed into the Lukaku thread. But I'm not a prententious little prick who seems to want to show his 'superior knowledge' by using words that are a little bit different to the words used by us 'normal' people.
'Prententious' is a little bit different, to be fair.
by Ian Royal » 12 Aug 2012 00:35
by Royal Bahamas » 12 Aug 2012 04:23
Ian Royal It must be getting very tiring going around with those massive chips on your shoulders. Take them off and have a holiday from egomania for a while.
by Royal Lady » 12 Aug 2012 10:09
by Platypuss » 12 Aug 2012 10:27
Royal Bahamas Siege, as I have stated on here before.....you have a lot of insightful comments made on HobNob.
by Ian Royal » 12 Aug 2012 13:07
Royal Lady With Cox going to Forest, I can't see WBA now also wanting to let Shane go.
End of rumour?
by Royal Ginger » 13 Aug 2012 07:49
TheSiege If being educated, opinionated and knowledgable (with a side salad of 'giving as good as I get') means to you that I have chips on my shoulder - so be it! You may be right but none of them are to do with RFC or this site. Perhaps you should look at yourself in the mirror and confront your feelings of inadequency!
by Extended-Phenotype » 13 Aug 2012 08:53
TheSiegeExtended-PhenotypeHampshire Royal
Seems odd to use 'subsumed' when talking about threads speculating on Long and Lukaku. Surely you mean the threads should be merged, unless you think that the signing of Long would be bigger thsn the signing of Lukaku. To my mind, I would simply have said 'merged' but if I found it necessary to use 'subsumed' I might have suggested that the Long thread should be subsumed into the Lukaku thread. But I'm not a prententious little prick who seems to want to show his 'superior knowledge' by using words that are a little bit different to the words used by us 'normal' people.
'Prententious' is a little bit different, to be fair.
Being Au Fait with the English language is not a Capital Offence. However, being unable to spell Pretentious says it all really! Don't come out with cr*p about things that you don't understand!
by Silver Fox » 13 Aug 2012 13:26
by Big Foot » 13 Aug 2012 14:34
Silver Fox Not reading what has been said on this thread so far, obviously, but my sources tell me this move is quite the possibility
by LightwaterRoyal » 13 Aug 2012 22:49
TheSiegeBig FootSilver Fox Not reading what has been said on this thread so far, obviously, but my sources tell me this move is quite the possibility
If he was a free-transfer on low wages you might well be right. He is'nt and it ain't going to occur!
by Big Foot » 13 Aug 2012 22:53
TheSiegeBig FootSilver Fox Not reading what has been said on this thread so far, obviously, but my sources tell me this move is quite the possibility
If he was a free-transfer on low wages you might well be right. He is'nt and it ain't going to occur!
by Big Foot » 13 Aug 2012 23:22
by Big Foot » 14 Aug 2012 08:41
TheSiege If we had spent the last ten years ONLY signing players that the Managers had worked with previously, we would not now be in the Prem. Players brought into RFC in the last ten years, who had not previously worked with the Manager at the time, probably outweigh the ones who did and were certainly the ones who produced two promotions!
by Millsy » 14 Aug 2012 22:58
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 23 guests