by loyalroyal4life » 12 Aug 2010 21:19
by loyalroyaldaz » 12 Aug 2010 21:40
LoyalRoyal22loyalroyaldaz Dont sell him for anything less than £15 million. Does anyone seriously believe that the chairman would allow more than half the money go back into the squad ?
My bet is most of the dosh would end up in the bank for a rainy day or to repay some loan somewhere !
If Bmc ended up with £5m to spend he couldnt replace The Sig and solve our defensive issues with that.
I would like to know why we werent back in for Betrand .
We wouldnt get anything near 15 million for him if we sold him this transfer window. Anywhere between 5-6.5 million would be more realistic.
by ScottishRoyal » 12 Aug 2010 22:14
by Hoop Blah » 12 Aug 2010 22:56
ScottishRoyal To be honest if the rumours on here of a £5m relaease clause are true then any talk of a transfer fee over £5m is just wasted breathe. He's probably worth over that now because of his potential, so selling him would be a real shame. As someone else suggested Walcott went to Arsenal for £12m, admittedly this comprised of numerous bonus payments, but it was a high fee nonetheless.
by peeping bernal » 12 Aug 2010 23:15
by leon » 13 Aug 2010 00:11
Hoop BlahScottishRoyal To be honest if the rumours on here of a £5m relaease clause are true then any talk of a transfer fee over £5m is just wasted breathe. He's probably worth over that now because of his potential, so selling him would be a real shame. As someone else suggested Walcott went to Arsenal for £12m, admittedly this comprised of numerous bonus payments, but it was a high fee nonetheless.
It was high, was good business for Southampton, but more importantly was what, 5 years ago now? There isn't quite as much money about these days.
Agree with the plaudits on this thread though. It's great to see a proper footballer and not just an athlete with just flashes of ability coming to the fore, and I'll be gutted if we don't get another season out of him before he takes the next step up.
by Terminal Boardom » 13 Aug 2010 09:17
ScottishRoyal To be honest if the rumours on here of a £5m relaease clause are true then any talk of a transfer fee over £5m is just wasted breathe. He's probably worth over that now because of his potential, so selling him would be a real shame. As someone else suggested Walcott went to Arsenal for £12m, admittedly this comprised of numerous bonus payments, but it was a high fee nonetheless.
by IcelandicStokie » 13 Aug 2010 09:46
by Hoop Blah » 13 Aug 2010 10:22
leonHoop Blah It was high, was good business for Southampton, but more importantly was what, 5 years ago now? There isn't quite as much money about these days.
Agree with the plaudits on this thread though. It's great to see a proper footballer and not just an athlete with just flashes of ability coming to the fore, and I'll be gutted if we don't get another season out of him before he takes the next step up.
spot on, the problem with English football encapsulated by sunderlands chief scout who said - we look for 6 ft plus players with power and pace - no mention there of vision, technical ability, passing etc...unsurprising then that the one player at rfc is from Iceland.
Anyway don't leave us, you're mint.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Plymouth exile and 185 guests