Pepe the Horseman No team news on the OS yet. Probably trying to decide what "injury" to give him.
It's bound to be along the lines of 'picked up a knock in training' didn't train this morning lark and hoping he will be fit for Friday.
by paulholsgrove » 14 Feb 2012 14:02
Pepe the Horseman No team news on the OS yet. Probably trying to decide what "injury" to give him.
by marcusopp » 14 Feb 2012 14:03
winchester_royalmarcusopp Why are people questioning the legality of the agreement?
The fact that it's a gentlemens agreement means it's got nothing to do with anyone else.
There are probably a few bits and pieces we're not aware of regarding the contracts etc.
Maybe derby loaned him to us, where he joins properly in the summer??
Other wingers;
Obita (loaned to barnet)
Shepperd (must be fit by now)
Kebe (fit at last!)
Mills (did alright according to most)
by Snowball » 14 Feb 2012 14:55
winchester_royal [
On a similar note, why do people keep saying that it's a sign of a good team that we keep winning despite getting outplayed? Hunt said a similar thing in an interview on the OS, and I'd argue that a sign of a good team is one that actually deserves to win a game, and I'd rather the players don't pat themselves on the back after a win like that on Saturday and instead concentrate on improving. Fair enough, if it was a one off poor performance away at somewhere like Donny and we grind out a 1-0 win then I could cope with the overuse of this particular footballing cliche, but we haven't dominated a game for a long time.
by pea » 14 Feb 2012 14:59
marcusoppwinchester_royalmarcusopp Why are people questioning the legality of the agreement?
The fact that it's a gentlemens agreement means it's got nothing to do with anyone else.
There are probably a few bits and pieces we're not aware of regarding the contracts etc.
Maybe derby loaned him to us, where he joins properly in the summer??
Other wingers;
Obita (loaned to barnet)
Shepperd (must be fit by now)
Kebe (fit at last!)
Mills (did alright according to most)
Alright mate, i was only guessing as to why!
by Hoop Blah » 14 Feb 2012 15:04
by chilipepper91 » 14 Feb 2012 15:06
by The Rouge » 14 Feb 2012 15:11
winchester_royal
On a similar note, why do people keep saying that it's a sign of a good team that we keep winning despite getting outplayed?
by Hoop Blah » 14 Feb 2012 16:26
The Rougewinchester_royal
On a similar note, why do people keep saying that it's a sign of a good team that we keep winning despite getting outplayed?
- Its a cliche wheeled out removes a bit of heat from interviews and to steer away any criticism
- It is probably actually a sign of a good team as it means, generally, that you are not conceding many whilst under pressure (which you will be if you are not playing that great)
by Ian Royal » 14 Feb 2012 16:47
winchester_royalScarface Jordan Obita's progress may be going well at Barnet, but surely he'd be much better playing for us in this injury crisis? He can't be worse than Mills was Saturday. It's not Mill's fault, he's not a winger, it was lucky we were playing the worst team in the league, which is apparently a banana skin.
On a similar note, why do people keep saying that it's a sign of a good team that we keep winning despite getting outplayed? Hunt said a similar thing in an interview on the OS, and I'd argue that a sign of a good team is one that actually deserves to win a game, and I'd rather the players don't pat themselves on the back after a win like that on Saturday and instead concentrate on improving.
Fair enough, if it was a one off poor performance away at somewhere like Donny and we grind out a 1-0 win then I could cope with the overuse of this particular footballing cliche, but we haven't dominated a game for a long time.
by rfc2001 » 14 Feb 2012 17:49
by Ian Royal » 14 Feb 2012 17:53
rfc2001 Championship is not about playing Barcelona type football its about being efficient like the Germans. QPR were not the most attractive team in the world but where did they finish. This league is all about getting promoted.
I'm happy
by sandman » 14 Feb 2012 18:06
Scarface Jordan Obita's progress may be going well at Barnet, but surely he'd be much better playing for us in this injury crisis? He can't be worse than Mills was Saturday. It's not Mill's fault, he's not a winger, it was lucky we were playing the worst team in the league, which is apparently a banana skin.
by RoyalJames101 » 14 Feb 2012 18:32
TheWearing tomasz cywka wont play tonight due to a gentlemen's agreement, not to play against his former club.
Meaning our third choice LB will be playing at LM. HRK, Jobi and Antonio all out.
http://www.thisisderbyshire.co.uk/Cywka ... um=twitter
by Snowball » 14 Feb 2012 18:50
Hoop Blah
I've been saying this for months. We're great at getting results but we're really not playing that well at all (depending on your definition I guess).
Ultimately I believe that, in the long run, results follow performances. At the moment this team is going some way to prove that wrong, but god it's not pretty to watch.
I think you're summing up of the cliche is pretty spot on though. It's just like using 'it's a tough place to go' in the build up to a game to line up an excuse nice and early.
by melonhead » 14 Feb 2012 18:52
by Snowball » 14 Feb 2012 18:53
by melonhead » 14 Feb 2012 18:55
by tomrfcurz » 14 Feb 2012 19:07
by Hoop Blah » 15 Feb 2012 08:47
SnowballHoop Blah
I've been saying this for months. We're great at getting results but we're really not playing that well at all (depending on your definition I guess).
Ultimately I believe that, in the long run, results follow performances. At the moment this team is going some way to prove that wrong, but god it's not pretty to watch.
I think you're summing up of the cliche is pretty spot on though. It's just like using 'it's a tough place to go' in the build up to a game to line up an excuse nice and early.
Hoop, they don't inspire me with confidence. No "magic". I can barely think of a great performance,
but surely a 23-game run where we have more ppg than any team in the league can't be an accident?
I suspect it's more to do with how McDermott sets us up. We win games without being pretty.
We could play a more expansive game and win some/lose some 3-2/2-3 but the way we are
setting out to play is ultra-safe in terms of hard-to-score against but is not so good for
generating chances, and thus our strikers have less goals etc.
by Alan Partridge » 15 Feb 2012 08:59
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 229 guests