by paultheroyal » 02 Jan 2016 20:22
by Royality creeps In » 02 Jan 2016 20:23
by marlowuk » 02 Jan 2016 20:24
by TBM » 02 Jan 2016 20:28
by ILoveMoonPig » 02 Jan 2016 20:40
by genome » 02 Jan 2016 20:42
Royal GingerDr_Hfuhruhurr I thought their man up front up was pretty decent.
If he'd spent any time on-side he could have been a threat.
by OldBiscuit » 02 Jan 2016 20:57
RG7FanRG7Fan
Corners - ughhh ...
by CountryRoyal » 02 Jan 2016 21:02
by bobby1413 » 02 Jan 2016 21:25
Chelsea/Royal It was woeful and we committed the cardinal sin of leaving before the end and missed,the bloody goal.
by CountryRoyal » 02 Jan 2016 21:27
bobby1413Chelsea/Royal It was woeful and we committed the cardinal sin of leaving before the end and missed,the bloody goal.
I hope you and the other 1000 or whatever learned your lesson.
I left early a few years ago when a last minute goal that was HUGE went in. I've never left early since, no point.
by John Madejski's Wallet » 02 Jan 2016 21:28
Pepe the Horseman Made such a difference having Quinn back in midfield. Up and down the whole game. Totes <3 him.
by WestRoyal » 02 Jan 2016 21:36
Snowball136 I thought we showed a lot of promise today and fully deserved to win.
El Habsi may make occasional blunders but he looks a far better keeper and actually commands his box
Gunter, IMO played well. He made some important interceptions and going forward got into great positions but at least three times Blackman gave a hospital pass. Solid 7
Cooper. Did VERY well, won more headers than anyone else ever does, made plenty of tackles/interceptions and plenty of excellent passes out. I seriously believe that if he was a regular for twenty games he'd soon be our number 1 CB. Impressed.
McShane (I'll bring my boots next home game just in case). Honestly can't remember much good or bad but he isn't as dominant as the early games
Taylor OK
Norwood mostly excellent but a couple of horrendous mistakes. I think various players making mistakes is coming because our shape goes ragged far too often.
Williams, I was bitching about him first half. He wastes a lot of ball. Remember that a kid with ADHD and a bull in a china shop shop energy. His energy is fantastic and second half it worked. If he had discipline and application he'd be playing at a higher level, As long as he brings this much energy play him, but frankly I ;d rathe have Tish. Second half there was a moment that was almost an exact copy of his goal v Bolton (where really he should have put Blackman clear. This time he shot (again) when the pass to Blackman was a better option and p!ssed 22 off. I think someone should have words. Just those two incidents (today and Bolton) and Blackman could very easily have two more goals. IMO Williams is a "messy" player and contributes less than it appears at first glance
Quinn, excellent again (great little player). good as a midfielder or LW or LB. Quality pro
Blackman (wing) Did OK except too many passes to Gunter that should have cut out the FB instead of allowing him to block. But he was overall OK and in the action a fair bit.
Blackman (striker)... a bit of old fashioned channel running or balls over the top a la Shane Long but a well-taken goal. I do NOT think the should start up front. He should play wide for 60 minutes with Sa-Vydra the front two (wearing down defenders)... Then and only if we are struggling, maybe pull of Sa, put Blackman up front (as today) and play McCleary wide.
Vydra is total quality but just drawing a blank ATM. His first chance was "made" by a brilliant run and him demanding the ball (from Quinn?) just a shame he knocked it wide. The narrow angle flash shot, well they get missed more often than scored. The third move (nice move) he sent it the leg side of the keeper but was unlucky to hit the keep's legs. We should persist with this guy.
Sa, not sure. I think he is by FAR our best hold-up player but he plays like he's not happy at Reading. I honestly think Sa-Vydra is the best front two by a mile.
McLeary was excellent when he came on, so was HRK. No complaints about Ferdinand (solid) but it's pretty clear his body is packing up so we need two CBs ASAP
We are a very good squad of players out of luck and out of confidence. Against Brentford we were done by two VG goals, we deserved something at Wo;res and at Hull, and threw away a 0-0 v QPR. I've lost count of the games we lost or drew this year because of silly goals or a poor defence in a dead ball situation. How many games are there where with 1% more luck we could have got extra points?
Birmingham away, Wednesday away, Hull away, Wolves Away. Derby H, QPR H, Brentford H at least. There are probably more, IMO if we finish say 8th this year, we could win this league with the same players.
We've had very few wins in our last 13 or so games but we have never been hammered. There's just something not clicking, and it may be too n==many loanees or too many foreigners, or a mouthy bad apple, I don't know.... but I fully expect us to come good and for McDermott to be winning more than 1.5 points per game (his current achievement)
by genome » 02 Jan 2016 21:43
by Lower West » 02 Jan 2016 21:45
CountryRoyal I'm amazed with the positive remarks, which I'm sure would not have appeared quite in the same manner had we not got that injury time goal.
by bobby1413 » 02 Jan 2016 21:49
CountryRoyal I'm amazed with the positive remarks, which I'm sure would not have appeared quite in the same manner had we not got that injury time goal.
I thought we were poor and it was an atrocious game of football between two terrible sides. We struggled immensely against one of the worst teams in the division and we looked a million miles away from a credible playoff contender.
by WestRoyal » 02 Jan 2016 22:08
genome Anyway, my comments.
I thought we were pretty bad today and that it was a nailed-on 0-0 draw, but it was superb to grab that goal, I love last minute winners, one of my favourite things in football. A much needed 3 points and the fact it came in the 90th minute might give our confidence more of a boost than a routine win.
I feel most of all we lacked urgency and energy going forward, especially from Blackman and Sa, that may well be a confidence thing. This improved a LOT when G-Mac came on, but I still could've seen a bit more impetus from other players off the ball when he was putting pressure on their left-back. Vydra should've put away some gilt-edged chances and for the fee we paid for him he should be banging those in. I like other aspects of his game though, did well for the goal, although he was winning a ball back that I think he lost in the first place.
Al-Habsi 5 - Not a save to make so hard to rate him. 5 seems harsh, but dunno if I can mark him up for anything!
Gunter 6 - Some good moments, some bad.
Cooper 7.5 - Very good
McShane 5 - Can't remember much of him before he went off.
Taylor 5 - A dodgy mistake that nearly let a player through, otherwise OK
Norwood 6 - His passing was hot and cold, didn't look as good as previous
Williams 7 - I love his energy and work rate, needs better vision, but put the amount of effort in I want to see from the rest of the team.
Quinn 7 - Good, couple of great tackles, moved to LB comfortably
Vydra 6 - As above, should be putting those chances away easily. Just needs a goal.
Blackman 6.5 - Again as above, just looks uninterested and lacking energy at times. Good winner.
Sa 5 - Good hold up play, not much else though.
Subs
Ferdinand 7 - Looked very assured coming back, harshly booked for a 50/50.
McCleary 7 - Changed the game, crossing perhaps could've been better
HRK 6.5 - Brought some energy to the team but not much quality, was a good tactical switch by B-Mac
by JIM » 02 Jan 2016 22:16
by Hoop Blah » 02 Jan 2016 22:17
Lower West Liked the minimal use of loan players today as well in the matchday squad. Along with the fact that everybody is getting a chance to prove their worth. .
by Pepe the Horseman » 02 Jan 2016 22:17
by Dave Gale » 02 Jan 2016 22:24
Hoop Blah Weren't all the loan players available involved?
We had Vydra and Taylor in the starting 11 with Piazon and Fernandez on the bench. The only loanees not involved were Hector and John, both of whom were unavailable. I wouldn't see that as any great change in approach (if that's what you were implying).
Users browsing this forum: bcubed, Bing [Bot], Clyde1998, stealthpapes and 117 guests