by Jagermesiter1871 » 10 Feb 2022 11:02
by NathStPaul » 10 Feb 2022 11:02
Jagermesiter1871 Am I the only one who thought that pretty good management from Pauno?
by Snowflake Royal » 10 Feb 2022 11:05
by Jagermesiter1871 » 10 Feb 2022 11:05
NathStPaulJagermesiter1871 Am I the only one who thought that pretty good management from Pauno?
Yes.
by Jagermesiter1871 » 10 Feb 2022 11:06
Snowflake Royal There were some high risk, but positive selection decisions. Some high risk and poor selection decisions.
Some positive sub decisions. Some terrible sub decisions.
And overall shambolic direction and structure to the team.
The phrase too little too late is rather apt.
by Theroyalbox » 10 Feb 2022 11:07
by NathStPaul » 10 Feb 2022 11:09
Jagermesiter1871NathStPaulJagermesiter1871 Am I the only one who thought that pretty good management from Pauno?
Yes.
What decision was poor? Or is it a case of lose game = Pauno bad.
by Snowflake Royal » 10 Feb 2022 11:11
Jagermesiter1871Snowflake Royal There were some high risk, but positive selection decisions. Some high risk and poor selection decisions.
Some positive sub decisions. Some terrible sub decisions.
And overall shambolic direction and structure to the team.
The phrase too little too late is rather apt.
Please expand, particularly what were the poor.
by YorkshireRoyal99 » 10 Feb 2022 11:15
Jagermesiter1871 Am I the only one who thought that was pretty good management from Pauno?
Dropped Drinkwater. Dropped Swift and brought him on at the moment I thought he should for Dele who I thought was starting to look poor. Also didn't disagree with dropping Southwood, although wasn't blown away by the GK.
by windermereROYAL » 10 Feb 2022 11:17
by URZZZZ » 10 Feb 2022 11:23
by Jagermesiter1871 » 10 Feb 2022 11:28
Snowflake RoyalJagermesiter1871Snowflake Royal There were some high risk, but positive selection decisions. Some high risk and poor selection decisions.
Some positive sub decisions. Some terrible sub decisions.
And overall shambolic direction and structure to the team.
The phrase too little too late is rather apt.
Please expand, particularly what were the poor.
Dropping Southwood for a 19 year old. Throwing Ince straight in.
Bringing on Drinkwater.
Not bringing on Clarke or Camara.
Not making a change at HT and waiting for us to go 2 down.
The entire structure, approach and attitude of the team.
Playing Hoilett central and TDB wide.
by URZZZZ » 10 Feb 2022 11:31
Jagermesiter1871Snowflake RoyalJagermesiter1871
Please expand, particularly what were the poor.
Dropping Southwood for a 19 year old. Throwing Ince straight in.
Bringing on Drinkwater.
Not bringing on Clarke or Camara.
Not making a change at HT and waiting for us to go 2 down.
The entire structure, approach and attitude of the team.
Playing Hoilett central and TDB wide.
after a half you probably edged?
by NathStPaul » 10 Feb 2022 11:32
URZZZZJagermesiter1871Snowflake Royal Dropping Southwood for a 19 year old. Throwing Ince straight in.
Bringing on Drinkwater.
Not bringing on Clarke or Camara.
Not making a change at HT and waiting for us to go 2 down.
The entire structure, approach and attitude of the team.
Playing Hoilett central and TDB wide.
after a half you probably edged?
by URZZZZ » 10 Feb 2022 11:35
NathStPaulURZZZZJagermesiter1871
after a half you probably edged?
Cannot be serious surely? Must be on a wind up.
by Hound » 10 Feb 2022 11:36
by Snowflake Royal » 10 Feb 2022 11:50
Jagermesiter1871Snowflake RoyalJagermesiter1871
Please expand, particularly what were the poor.
Dropping Southwood for a 19 year old. Throwing Ince straight in.
Bringing on Drinkwater.
Not bringing on Clarke or Camara.
Not making a change at HT and waiting for us to go 2 down.
The entire structure, approach and attitude of the team.
Playing Hoilett central and TDB wide.
Southwoods been crap. Keeper was fine. Ince was MOTM for me.
Drinkwater was on for our most effective period
Do you really make changes when 1 nil down after a half you probably edged?
by Royal_jimmy » 10 Feb 2022 12:36
andrew1957 Not surprised Southwood dropped as we clearly promised Arsenal that Hein would be first choice but I think it is a disgraceful decision - especially as Southwood was arguably MOTM against QPR. I can only imagine the howls on here if Hein makes some errors tonight and costs us 3 points. He had better be very good.
by Stranded » 10 Feb 2022 12:42
Royal_jimmyandrew1957 Not surprised Southwood dropped as we clearly promised Arsenal that Hein would be first choice but I think it is a disgraceful decision - especially as Southwood was arguably MOTM against QPR. I can only imagine the howls on here if Hein makes some errors tonight and costs us 3 points. He had better be very good.
Southwood isn't all that. All he's done is make mistakes and cost us important points
by URZZZZ » 10 Feb 2022 13:28
Hound Both sides were equally poor in the first half tbh.
I thought Bristol were the worst side I've seen us play this year. Really, really bad.
Users browsing this forum: Starry Blue Hooped Wonder, stealthpapes, WestYorksRoyal and 100 guests