by The Royal Forester » 31 Oct 2024 13:52
by WestYorksRoyal » 31 Oct 2024 13:54
Snowflake RoyalLinden Jones' TashSnowflake Royal Yeah, Administration is actually looking like our only way out.
And currently we'd still be just above relegation.
Given the football club (brand & STAFF), Training ground, Stadium, and other linked assets & liabilities are owned by a complex web of offshore entities, etc.
Can someone explain to me how defaulting on our commitments would be a good thing....?
I may be naive, but I don't understand why people keep saying this.
Administration means Administrators take charge and sell the club. Dai loses all control. Dai's control is the single biggest problem.
by Snowflake Royal » 31 Oct 2024 14:24
WestYorksRoyalSnowflake RoyalLinden Jones' Tash
Given the football club (brand & STAFF), Training ground, Stadium, and other linked assets & liabilities are owned by a complex web of offshore entities, etc.
Can someone explain to me how defaulting on our commitments would be a good thing....?
I may be naive, but I don't understand why people keep saying this.
Administration means Administrators take charge and sell the club. Dai loses all control. Dai's control is the single biggest problem.
It does create a mess though. Suppose, efforts to sell so far have been for the stadium, Bearwood and the club.
If the club goes into administration by itself, a buyer can buy it for £1, but it would be without all the above which would still be in Dai's tangled web of offshore entities and Chinese legal battles.
by retro royal » 31 Oct 2024 14:38
by RoyalBlue » 31 Oct 2024 19:15
windermereROYAL Somebody please explain to me who can place us into administration? Dai obviously, but who else?
by windermereROYAL » 31 Oct 2024 19:53
by tmesis » 31 Oct 2024 21:48
RoyalBluewindermereROYAL Somebody please explain to me who can place us into administration? Dai obviously, but who else?
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/all-notices/content/101529
In the UK, administrators can sell property used as collateral for a secured loan, but specific rules and considerations must be met:
Consent of the Secured Creditor: The administrator needs to obtain the consent of the secured creditor (e.g., a bank or financial institution holding the loan) before selling the property. This is because the property serves as collateral for the secured loan, and the creditor has legal rights over it.
Court Approval: In some cases, if the secured creditor does not consent to the sale, the administrator can apply to the court for permission to sell the property. The court must be satisfied that the sale is in the best interest of the creditors and the overall administration process.
Purpose of Administration: The primary goal of an administration is to rescue the company, achieve a better result for the creditors than would be likely if the company were wound up (i.e., liquidated), or to realize property to make distributions to one or more secured or preferential creditors. The sale of secured assets can be part of these strategies if it helps to achieve these objectives.
Payment to the Secured Creditor: If the property is sold, the secured creditor's claim must be settled. This means that proceeds from the sale would first go to satisfy the debt owed to the secured creditor before any remaining funds could be used for other purposes or distributed to other creditors.
by Lower West » 31 Oct 2024 23:54
windermereROYAL Somebody please explain to me who can place us into administration? Dai obviously, but who else?
by Mr Angry » 01 Nov 2024 05:29
by Sutekh » 01 Nov 2024 07:05
by Sutekh » 01 Nov 2024 07:07
tmesisRoyalBluewindermereROYAL Somebody please explain to me who can place us into administration? Dai obviously, but who else?
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/all-notices/content/101529
Given that Dai wouldn't do it, nor would the directors, that only really leaves a successful winding up order as the only way it could happen.
We aren't going to get wound up while we still have some money to pay the bills, so that really seems to suggest that it would only happen if we'd spent the season ticket money and the Olise money, and consequently would be lucky to finish the season.
An administrator would then come in and slash costs to the bone while looking for a buyer. It would not be pretty.
The wonders of ChatGPT also suggest that the stadium situation doesn't get easily resolved by going into administrationIn the UK, administrators can sell property used as collateral for a secured loan, but specific rules and considerations must be met:
Consent of the Secured Creditor: The administrator needs to obtain the consent of the secured creditor (e.g., a bank or financial institution holding the loan) before selling the property. This is because the property serves as collateral for the secured loan, and the creditor has legal rights over it.
Court Approval: In some cases, if the secured creditor does not consent to the sale, the administrator can apply to the court for permission to sell the property. The court must be satisfied that the sale is in the best interest of the creditors and the overall administration process.
Purpose of Administration: The primary goal of an administration is to rescue the company, achieve a better result for the creditors than would be likely if the company were wound up (i.e., liquidated), or to realize property to make distributions to one or more secured or preferential creditors. The sale of secured assets can be part of these strategies if it helps to achieve these objectives.
Payment to the Secured Creditor: If the property is sold, the secured creditor's claim must be settled. This means that proceeds from the sale would first go to satisfy the debt owed to the secured creditor before any remaining funds could be used for other purposes or distributed to other creditors.
In other words we could go into administration without being able to sell the club as a whole, in which case the clubs becomes much less valuable or viable.
by mikey_1871 » 01 Nov 2024 10:13
Sutekhtmesis
Given that Dai wouldn't do it, nor would the directors, that only really leaves a successful winding up order as the only way it could happen.
We aren't going to get wound up while we still have some money to pay the bills, so that really seems to suggest that it would only happen if we'd spent the season ticket money and the Olise money, and consequently would be lucky to finish the season.
An administrator would then come in and slash costs to the bone while looking for a buyer. It would not be pretty.
The wonders of ChatGPT also suggest that the stadium situation doesn't get easily resolved by going into administrationIn the UK, administrators can sell property used as collateral for a secured loan, but specific rules and considerations must be met:
Consent of the Secured Creditor: The administrator needs to obtain the consent of the secured creditor (e.g., a bank or financial institution holding the loan) before selling the property. This is because the property serves as collateral for the secured loan, and the creditor has legal rights over it.
Court Approval: In some cases, if the secured creditor does not consent to the sale, the administrator can apply to the court for permission to sell the property. The court must be satisfied that the sale is in the best interest of the creditors and the overall administration process.
Purpose of Administration: The primary goal of an administration is to rescue the company, achieve a better result for the creditors than would be likely if the company were wound up (i.e., liquidated), or to realize property to make distributions to one or more secured or preferential creditors. The sale of secured assets can be part of these strategies if it helps to achieve these objectives.
Payment to the Secured Creditor: If the property is sold, the secured creditor's claim must be settled. This means that proceeds from the sale would first go to satisfy the debt owed to the secured creditor before any remaining funds could be used for other purposes or distributed to other creditors.
In other words we could go into administration without being able to sell the club as a whole, in which case the clubs becomes much less valuable or viable.
Equally though any Administrators have to balance that side with maintaining a club that is reasonably competitive in the league (though I think it might be seen as pretty pointless after the 12 point deduction).
by Sutekh » 01 Nov 2024 10:42
by Crusader Royal » 01 Nov 2024 11:06
mikey_1871Sutekhtmesis Given that Dai wouldn't do it, nor would the directors, that only really leaves a successful winding up order as the only way it could happen.
We aren't going to get wound up while we still have some money to pay the bills, so that really seems to suggest that it would only happen if we'd spent the season ticket money and the Olise money, and consequently would be lucky to finish the season.
An administrator would then come in and slash costs to the bone while looking for a buyer. It would not be pretty.
The wonders of ChatGPT also suggest that the stadium situation doesn't get easily resolved by going into administration
In other words we could go into administration without being able to sell the club as a whole, in which case the clubs becomes much less valuable or viable.
Equally though any Administrators have to balance that side with maintaining a club that is reasonably competitive in the league (though I think it might be seen as pretty pointless after the 12 point deduction).
I don't think it would. We'd still be outside the relegation zone if a 12 point deduction was applied today. Very good chance of staying up if we can remain competetive,
by windermereROYAL » 01 Nov 2024 11:35
by tmesis » 01 Nov 2024 12:02
Crusader Royal It would be the sale of all our senior players at knock down prices and probably having an Academy coach managing the team that would be the issue. I don’t think administrators would have to make decisions about a ‘competitive’ side, they would just need to try and ensure we fulfilled our fixtures.
by Sutekh » 01 Nov 2024 13:56
Crusader Royal
It would be the sale of all our decent senior players at knock down prices and probably having an Academy coach managing the team that would be the issue. I don’t think administrators would have to make decisions about a ‘competitive’ side, they would just need to try and ensure we fulfilled our fixtures.
by mikey_1871 » 01 Nov 2024 15:01
Crusader Royalmikey_1871Sutekh
Equally though any Administrators have to balance that side with maintaining a club that is reasonably competitive in the league (though I think it might be seen as pretty pointless after the 12 point deduction).
I don't think it would. We'd still be outside the relegation zone if a 12 point deduction was applied today. Very good chance of staying up if we can remain competetive,
It would be the sale of all our senior players at knock down prices and probably having an Academy coach managing the team that would be the issue. I don’t think administrators would have to make decisions about a ‘competitive’ side, they would just need to try and ensure we fulfilled our fixtures.
by Crusader Royal » 01 Nov 2024 15:07
mikey_1871Crusader Royalmikey_1871
I don't think it would. We'd still be outside the relegation zone if a 12 point deduction was applied today. Very good chance of staying up if we can remain competetive,
It would be the sale of all our senior players at knock down prices and probably having an Academy coach managing the team that would be the issue. I don’t think administrators would have to make decisions about a ‘competitive’ side, they would just need to try and ensure we fulfilled our fixtures.
Well yes, if that happens then we're buggered.
But that was not the point I was questioning, it was whether it would be seen as pointless to remain competetive after a 12 point deduction
by SouthDownsRoyal » 02 Nov 2024 11:48
Users browsing this forum: Armadillo Roadkill, Mr Angry and 228 guests