Top FlightTop Flight2 world wars, 1 world cup What many people seem to be misunderstanding is the interest return factor that the payments have resulted in.
His payments to the club have to be offset against outgoing assets dissolved from the real estate value of tenancy shares (or not as the case may be). It's no surprise that with the current interest rates the saleable percentage of the desired sum is roughly £4.5million - this year alone!
If we take this away from an average recuperance of £800,000 per year (plus or minus the instability gap margin) it relocates the assets of forced income to the square root of the ticket prices (per 10,000 assuming we're close to full capacity every game).
The simplest of econonical analyses can be applied to the resulting dividend value of gross difference, scaleable to a factor of 13. That is to say, if we take the current FTSE and the interest rates at present, and apply the above to the AGC (annual growth coefficient) we get a value of around 36.244. Not too bad, I'm sure most of you with even the most elementary of business knowledge will agree!
In other words, of the 74% of the payback rent to John Madejski, the DOW-JONES index manipulator sees that even if we lose all our remaining games the net imbalance multiplier sees that we may not be in such a bad state, thanks to tax relief at the present rate of unitary consistency benefits.
I just thought I'd simplify it as everyone seems to be getting confused. In summary, it doesn't matter whether you understand it all or not. The fact is we're doing oxf*rd well having spent oxf*rd all and we have a lot to thank the Madman for.
You what?
Could you please explain what you mean by the following:
"Unitary consistency benefits"
"Net imbalance multiplier"
?
What don't you get?
Did you do GCSE maths!??
