Sarah Star Does that mean we'll lose O'Dea and Ingimarsson in January?
Free to talk in January, contracted 'til the end of the season.
by Ian Royal » 26 Nov 2009 22:45
Sarah Star Does that mean we'll lose O'Dea and Ingimarsson in January?
by Tony Le Mesmer » 26 Nov 2009 22:53
Focher
Whitlock>>>>Pearce
Royalee i know where you live
by Cookie » 26 Nov 2009 22:59
by Terminal Boardom » 26 Nov 2009 23:11
by loyalroyal4life » 27 Nov 2009 00:01
Royalee The fact that he's rejected it would indicate that BR clearly doesn't rate him as highly as some on here...
by SLAMMED » 27 Nov 2009 00:01
Archie's penaltyDOYLERSAROYALERNR_Royal
We HAVE to sign a RB, 1 or 2 CBs and a ST in January. We HAVE to.
To which Egoman will say "give youth a chance" - he's the new Grand Old Duke of York - hes taking his men back down again - no chance of any purchases
Are you THOU VOICE?
by Sarah Star » 27 Nov 2009 00:07
Ian RoyalSarah Star Does that mean we'll lose O'Dea and Ingimarsson in January?
Free to talk in January, contracted 'til the end of the season.
by Archie's penalty » 27 Nov 2009 00:32
SLAMMED DO YOU SEE?
by SLAMMED » 27 Nov 2009 00:53
Archie's penaltySLAMMED DO YOU SEE?
NO!
by Archie's penalty » 27 Nov 2009 00:56
SLAMMEDArchie's penaltySLAMMED DO YOU SEE?
NO!
You know it makes senseeeeeeeeee
by Royalee » 27 Nov 2009 01:20
loyalroyal4lifeRoyalee The fact that he's rejected it would indicate that BR clearly doesn't rate him as highly as some on here...
No one on here is saying he is amazing (well maybe a few) but to say Pearce is better than him is an eye opener. They are both shit.
Time for mills and a new cb to take over
i would ship Ivar out in Jan
by londinium » 27 Nov 2009 01:31
Royaleeloyalroyal4lifeRoyalee The fact that he's rejected it would indicate that BR clearly doesn't rate him as highly as some on here...
No one on here is saying he is amazing (well maybe a few) but to say Pearce is better than him is an eye opener. They are both shit.
Time for mills and a new cb to take over
i would ship Ivar out in Jan
I'm not saying for one minute that Pearce is the finished article or a top class defender yet, but he's far more consistent than Ingimarsson, who is the one supposedly more experienced and less likely to make more mistakes. I feel far more confident with Pearce there and for his lack of pace he more than makes up for it in anticipation and good use of the ball. With the exception of the Newcastle game, you very rarely see him give the ball away or lose his man. Don't get me wrong, Ivar's been a great servant for the club, but he's had it, just like Gunnarsson and it's no coincidence that when the most 'senior players' played at QPR, we played the worst we have all season.
by Archie's penalty » 27 Nov 2009 01:38
londinium [ Have to totallly disagree... Pearce is a complete and utter liabilty...he is crap in the air, not very fast and has the positional sence and awareness of a cheesecake. Ivar may have had a couple of bad games this season but remember he was injured for a long period. Pearce hasn't had a couple of good games and has been at fault for more goals individually than any other player by a long way.
Ivar may not be the force of old but I would rate him above Pearce at the moment... infact I would rate both Mills and O'dea above Pearce too.
by Royalee » 27 Nov 2009 01:47
londinium Have to totallly disagree... Pearce is a complete and utter liabilty...he is crap in the air, not very fast and has the positional sence and awareness of a cheesecake. Ivar may have had a couple of bad games this season but remember he was injured for a long period. Pearce hasn't had a couple of good games and has been at fault for more goals individually than any other player by a long way.
Ivar may not be the force of old but I would rate him above Pearce at the moment... infact I would rate both Mills and O'dea above Pearce too.
by londinium » 27 Nov 2009 02:05
Royaleelondinium Have to totallly disagree... Pearce is a complete and utter liabilty...he is crap in the air, not very fast and has the positional sence and awareness of a cheesecake. Ivar may have had a couple of bad games this season but remember he was injured for a long period. Pearce hasn't had a couple of good games and has been at fault for more goals individually than any other player by a long way.
Ivar may not be the force of old but I would rate him above Pearce at the moment... infact I would rate both Mills and O'dea above Pearce too.
I'm at a loss as to where Pearce has been 'crap in the air' or has has 'the positional sense and awareness of a cheesecake'...do you actually get to games?
by Royalee » 27 Nov 2009 02:07
by Archie's penalty » 27 Nov 2009 02:13
Royalee I get to nearly all games...it's funny because people who don't post on here all think Pearce is a decent player.
by The whole year inn » 27 Nov 2009 07:26
Royalee I get to nearly all games...it's funny because people who don't post on here all think Pearce is a decent player.
by Stranded » 27 Nov 2009 08:06
Royalee The fact that he's rejected it would indicate that BR clearly doesn't rate him as highly as some on here...
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 27 Nov 2009 09:05