MK Dons (H) Match Thread - Sponsored by AFC Wimbledon

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: MK Dons (H) Match Thread - Sponsored by AFC Wimbledon

by Ian Royal » 22 Aug 2015 23:35

Nameless The players who can genuinely play wide are youngsters with less than a handful of appearances between them, and have both just come back from injury. To throw Stacey and Fosu in would be brave, and potentially exciting but I'd be worried what it would do to us defensively.
You're obviously right that the current lack of proper width is hurting us, but Williams and Quinn are still putting in major contributions. If we played Stacey and Fosu then potentially two of Alex, Williams and Quinn would be on the bench !!

Well two of them are surely going to be on the bench when McCleary and Hurtado are fit and ready.

We also have Obita as a wide option with Taylor at left back. If Stacey's been fit enough for the bench for four games he's fit enough to have at least made a 20 minute cameo to add width late on by now.

I'm not saying it's ideal, but give us a chance to win a game by having a crack at giving some service.

marlowuk We played very well today - except, of course, in the shooting department. We are light years better than we were last season under Clarke or Adkins. After 2 games we had had more shots on goal than any other championship club. I don't know if that still holds now but only Bolton had more shots than us today (21 while we had 20). So far as shots on our goal are concerned, after 4 games only Preston (6) have fewer than us (9). Our defence is solid and we are creating chances. We 'simply' need a goalscorer - preferably two!

Yeah, but how many of those many shots have looked anything like troubling the goal?

It's not like we're coming away from games having arrowed shot after shot fractionally wide or over. Nor like we're coming away from games saying the opposition keeper has had an outstanding day. Yeah there's been some good saves, but not huge numbers of great ones to stop us. In fact, people have scoffed at the number of shots recorded in the stats saying they can only remember a handful of decent chances in some games.

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: MK Dons (H) Match Thread - Sponsored by AFC Wimbledon

by melonhead » 22 Aug 2015 23:54

A handful of good. Chances should be enough to win most games.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: MK Dons (H) Match Thread - Sponsored by AFC Wimbledon

by Ian Royal » 23 Aug 2015 00:07

melonhead A handful of good. Chances should be enough to win most games.

I didn't say good though did I. And not putting away good chances is a part of the problem, if a smaller one than not taking enough poor or ok chances and turnign them into good ones.

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: MK Dons (H) Match Thread - Sponsored by AFC Wimbledon

by melonhead » 23 Aug 2015 01:20

But we had a handful of good chances. Whether u say so or not.
We don't have a striker yet, and most of our best attacking players are out.

marlowuk
Member
Posts: 887
Joined: 18 Aug 2012 16:25

Re: MK Dons (H) Match Thread - Sponsored by AFC Wimbledon

by marlowuk » 23 Aug 2015 01:31

Ian Royal Yeah, but how many of those many shots have looked anything like troubling the goal?


Absolutely that is the problem. But we have created those chances and we need striker(s) who can make the most of these; who can trouble the goal! Maybe Hurtado is the answer? Or maybe Pog can come into his own now we are creating chances? Maybe we can create even more chances with McCleary and/or Fosu as wing men once they are fit? There are so many 'maybe's but all point to a significantly better season than the last one! But we need to get behind the players to help ensure that is the case!


User avatar
frimmers3
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6820
Joined: 04 Jan 2010 20:46
Location: a thorn in the flesh.............

Re: MK Dons (H) Match Thread - Sponsored by AFC Wimbledon

by frimmers3 » 23 Aug 2015 06:45

Having lost the sausage sandwich game, was it any real surprise that the game against the Dons was not as perhaps rewarding as it could have been?

User avatar
Fluff
Member
Posts: 622
Joined: 25 Jan 2006 16:46
Location: HNA? Prediction league champion 2012/13

Re: MK Dons (H) Match Thread - Sponsored by AFC Wimbledon

by Fluff » 23 Aug 2015 07:35

frimmers3 Having lost the sausage sandwich game, was it any real surprise that the game against the Dons was not as perhaps rewarding as it could have been?


Was it any surprise that we failed to score in both?
:(

MR. CYNICAL
Member
Posts: 176
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 22:33
Location: Basingstoke

Re: MK Dons (H) Match Thread - Sponsored by AFC Wimbledon

by MR. CYNICAL » 23 Aug 2015 09:56

The stats say that they dominated possession 52% -48%!

User avatar
tidus_mi2
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7413
Joined: 15 Jun 2012 15:24

Re: MK Dons (H) Match Thread - Sponsored by AFC Wimbledon

by tidus_mi2 » 23 Aug 2015 12:14

MR. CYNICAL The stats say that they dominated possession 52% -48%!

They passed it around defence a lot under 0 pressure.


User avatar
Lower West
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4984
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:35
Location: Admiring Clem Morfuni at Work

Re: MK Dons (H) Match Thread - Sponsored by AFC Wimbledon

by Lower West » 23 Aug 2015 17:23

marlowuk Or maybe Pog can come into his own now we are creating chances?


Looking forward to seeing Pog and Sa pair up. Pog likes to drop off while Sa plays on the shoulder of the defensive line. So may well complement each other.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jammy Dodger, Royals and Racers, Tinpot Royal and 223 guests

It is currently 29 Nov 2024 17:35