by Archie's penalty » 03 Jan 2013 13:42
by Alexander Litvinenko » 03 Jan 2013 13:46
by Royal91 » 03 Jan 2013 13:47
by Alexander Litvinenko » 03 Jan 2013 13:49
by Wimb » 03 Jan 2013 13:51
by Simon's Church » 03 Jan 2013 13:57
by moonwalklikebas » 03 Jan 2013 14:02
by Wimb » 03 Jan 2013 14:11
by Archie's penalty » 03 Jan 2013 14:13
Alexander Litvinenko This is worth looking at :
With compliments to The Swiss Ramble - full article, highly recommended is here : http://swissramble.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/reading-fc-dear-prudence.html
by noelgallagher » 03 Jan 2013 14:15
by Hoop Blah » 03 Jan 2013 14:22
Wimb The notable things from me, re-reading that is that the wage bill more than doubled between 06 and 07, despite only really adding Halford, Duberry, Seol & De La Cruz.
Also the fact that our wage bill in the last play-off final season was 50% higher than it was when we won the league in 05/06.
by Wimb » 03 Jan 2013 14:23
Hoop BlahWimb The notable things from me, re-reading that is that the wage bill more than doubled between 06 and 07, despite only really adding Halford, Duberry, Seol & De La Cruz.
Also the fact that our wage bill in the last play-off final season was 50% higher than it was when we won the league in 05/06.
Lots of new contracts for existing players and salary increases for those who already had that in their existing contracts.
The extra wages in the play off year, compared to 05/06, probably show the effect the Premier League was still having on our finances. Interesting to note that the revenue pretty similarily effected too.
by melonhead » 03 Jan 2013 15:08
Alexander Litvinenko This is worth looking at :
With compliments to The Swiss Ramble - full article, highly recommended is here : http://swissramble.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/reading-fc-dear-prudence.html
by Wimb » 03 Jan 2013 15:13
by Alexander Litvinenko » 03 Jan 2013 15:13
melonhead is the loss of 5.4 million last year antons money in jan? or is that before it happened.
also- oxf*rd ever running a football club this size.
tiny profits at best if you run sensibly. big losses if you in any way try and go for it.
interesting to see that blackpool tried to keep their wage bill/spending sensible. and also went down
by Hoop Blah » 03 Jan 2013 15:23
melonhead also- oxf*rd ever running a football club this size.
by Alexander Litvinenko » 03 Jan 2013 15:27
Hoop Blahmelonhead also- oxf*rd ever running a football club this size.
You have to do it for the love and glory of the game really. There isn't any money to be made in it unless you rip a club apart, and even then I can't think there's much to be made.
The alternative, perhaps modern way, is that you use it as a very expensive PR machine.
by melonhead » 03 Jan 2013 15:47
Hoop Blahmelonhead also- oxf*rd ever running a football club this size.
You have to do it for the love and glory of the game really. There isn't any money to be made in it unless you rip a club apart, and even then I can't think there's much to be made.
The alternative, perhaps modern way, is that you use it as a very expensive PR machine.
by Wimb » 03 Jan 2013 15:51
melonheadHoop Blahmelonhead also- oxf*rd ever running a football club this size.
You have to do it for the love and glory of the game really. There isn't any money to be made in it unless you rip a club apart, and even then I can't think there's much to be made.
The alternative, perhaps modern way, is that you use it as a very expensive PR machine.
think the only way is to take smaller clubs, run them sensibly, grow their infrastructure and profile over a long period, and sell at the correct time
by Esteban » 03 Jan 2013 15:53
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 123 guests