by Forest Gump » 22 Jan 2007 21:30
by Avon Royal » 22 Jan 2007 21:34
Forest Gump Still think he was entirely innocent in connection with the Cech incident and no blame appears to attach over the clash with Gillespie - however he does seem to attract controversy!
It appears that his role is to ruffle the opposition with his energy and "in the face" style but after the game on Saturday I felt myself wishing that he hadn't caried out the two footed tackle on the corner flag as part of the goal celebration. It seemed very inappropriate after all the aggression that had surrounded his clash with Gillespie.
Reading had a superb disciplinary record last season with very few bookings and (if I am correct) no sendings off. This time there have been more cards and more ontroversies. Most of these have been as a natural result of the increased pressure on the premiership game and Reading can claim to remain a fair team. However, we don't really need players to act over-aggressively or in a provocative way.
I am sure that Messers Madejski and Coppel will agree - and will probably have a quiet word with the player.
by Banjax » 22 Jan 2007 21:36
by phil in cornwall » 22 Jan 2007 21:36
by Rhys The Royal » 22 Jan 2007 21:38
by Fat Leather Jacket » 22 Jan 2007 21:40
Forest Gump Still think he was entirely innocent in connection with the Cech incident and no blame appears to attach over the clash with Gillespie - however he does seem to attract controversy!
It appears that his role is to ruffle the opposition with his energy and "in the face" style but after the game on Saturday I felt myself wishing that he hadn't caried out the two footed tackle on the corner flag as part of the goal celebration. It seemed very inappropriate after all the aggression that had surrounded his clash with Gillespie.
Reading had a superb disciplinary record last season with very few bookings and (if I am correct) no sendings off. This time there have been more cards and more ontroversies. Most of these have been as a natural result of the increased pressure on the premiership game and Reading can claim to remain a fair team. However, we don't really need players to act over-aggressively or in a provocative way.
I am sure that Messers Madejski and Coppel will agree - and will probably have a quiet word with the player.
by phil in cornwall » 22 Jan 2007 21:42
Fat Leather JacketForest Gump Still think he was entirely innocent in connection with the Cech incident and no blame appears to attach over the clash with Gillespie - however he does seem to attract controversy!
It appears that his role is to ruffle the opposition with his energy and "in the face" style but after the game on Saturday I felt myself wishing that he hadn't caried out the two footed tackle on the corner flag as part of the goal celebration. It seemed very inappropriate after all the aggression that had surrounded his clash with Gillespie.
Reading had a superb disciplinary record last season with very few bookings and (if I am correct) no sendings off. This time there have been more cards and more ontroversies. Most of these have been as a natural result of the increased pressure on the premiership game and Reading can claim to remain a fair team. However, we don't really need players to act over-aggressively or in a provocative way.
I am sure that Messers Madejski and Coppel will agree - and will probably have a quiet word with the player.
What a total load of shite.
by jenster81 » 22 Jan 2007 21:43
by willz_royal » 22 Jan 2007 21:43
by exileinleeds » 22 Jan 2007 21:53
by Banjax » 22 Jan 2007 21:54
by MR. CYNICAL » 22 Jan 2007 21:54
by Royal Rother » 22 Jan 2007 21:55
by hughsies no.1 » 22 Jan 2007 22:18
by roland* » 22 Jan 2007 22:31
Forest Gump Still think he was entirely innocent in connection with the Cech incident and no blame appears to attach over the clash with Gillespie - however he does seem to attract controversy!
It appears that his role is to ruffle the opposition with his energy and "in the face" style but after the game on Saturday I felt myself wishing that he hadn't caried out the two footed tackle on the corner flag as part of the goal celebration. It seemed very inappropriate after all the aggression that had surrounded his clash with Gillespie.
by Ian Royal » 22 Jan 2007 22:43
by M4 Junction 11 » 22 Jan 2007 22:48
by Denver Royal » 22 Jan 2007 22:49
Forest Gump Still think he was entirely innocent in connection with the Cech incident and no blame appears to attach over the clash with Gillespie - however he does seem to attract controversy!
It appears that his role is to ruffle the opposition with his energy and "in the face" style but after the game on Saturday I felt myself wishing that he hadn't caried out the two footed tackle on the corner flag as part of the goal celebration. It seemed very inappropriate after all the aggression that had surrounded his clash with Gillespie.
Reading had a superb disciplinary record last season with very few bookings and (if I am correct) no sendings off. This time there have been more cards and more ontroversies. Most of these have been as a natural result of the increased pressure on the premiership game and Reading can claim to remain a fair team. However, we don't really need players to act over-aggressively or in a provocative way.
I am sure that Messers Madejski and Coppel will agree - and will probably have a quiet word with the player.
by brighton_royal » 22 Jan 2007 23:00
by shadesrwrf » 22 Jan 2007 23:17
Denver Royal his antics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 306 guests