18 January 2003: LEAGUE DIVISION ONE
READING 0 WALSALL 0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
goals
|
Reading:
- Walsall: - |
Half Time: 0-0
Attendance: 11,786
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
teams
|
Reading: Hahnemann, Murty,
Shorey, Mackie, Brown, Igoe, Harper, Newman (Salako 45), Hughes, Butler
(Tyson 82), Forster (Cureton 62). Subs not used: Ashdown, Viveash. Walsall: Walker, Bazeley, Aranalde, Carbon (Matias 26), Hay, Wrack, Simpson, Emblen, Corica, Junior, Leitao (Zdrilic 62). Subs not used: Ward, Wright, Martinez. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bookings
|
Reading: Brown, Igoe. Walsall: Corica, Emblen, Junior. Referee: Phil Joslin (Newark) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
report
|
We weren't expecting the best afternoon's entertainment from our third game against Walsall in four fixtures - and we got what we expected. Reading's lowest league crowd of the season will have gone home massively disappointed at another average performance from the Royals that our exposed our massive inability to find the back of the net. In the three recent games against the Saddlers the only goal we managed was an own goal in the cup replay - unless one out of the three penalties counts as well. It was our inability up front that let us down today against a Walsall side that clearly came for the point - and went away with it as they planned. Pardew once again opted to leave Cureton on the bench, but gave Hughes a starting place with Tyson relegated to the subs bench. Hughes looked a little out of place in Tyson's role and Reading were to rely on Murty and Shorey to work the ball forward with Igoe having a quiet first half. Right from kick-off it was clear that Walsall were keen to play time out and take the point and as a result the game instantly took on a slow scrappy pattern with neither side looking that excited about the game. We probably played into their hands by failing to step up the speed of the game until the last part of the second half. The first half flicked between high hoofing and mis-placed passes to slow build up play that failed to trouble either side. At least Reading's defence looked solid throughout with Brown and Mackie containing the Walsall attack and Hahnemann looked back in control overall. Reading had the best chances of a very quiet first half but failed to take them. Butler looked nervous up front and prefered to be working the ball forward to Forster rather than taking the chances himself. In the air, he once again was always second to the ball behind the defence as Walsall continually cleared with ease. Forster looked lively but didn't have enough chances to break free with Reading losing possession in the final third on a regular basis on the rare occassions they tried to break through. The best chances of the first half came when Butler played an excellent through ball to Nicky Forster. Forster ran onto it and looked favourite to score with just the keeper to beat. It might have taken a slight deflection off of the Walsall keeper to force it onto the base the far post. The rebound came to Butler who sent the ball flying into the air and was over the crossbar, deep into the South Stand - it was typical of another frustrating performance from Butler. Down the other end, Walsall never looked likely to score with the best attempts being two attempts from Junior from outside the area that Hahnemann saved with ease. Salako replaced Newman at half time and Reading were to have a better second half. Our greatest problem continued to be the pace of the game - too slow to launch any dangerous attacks with Walsall ready for anything with all eleven men behind the ball. The introduction of Cureton at last gave us an injection of pace and ambition that might have earnt us the win. Everyone expected Butler to make way for Cureton and Pardew's decision to replace Forster was met with a chorus of boos around the Madejski Stadium. Forster was one of the few dangerous players on the pitch. Having survived this substitution Butler was to have his best period of the game, linking up well on a few forward moves with Cureton. Butler was eventually reaplaced with Tyson with just eight minutes of the game remaining - and it was our strongest eight minutes of the game up front. Perhaps a combination of Forster and Cureton from the start might have been just what we needed against this Walsall defence. But sadly it wasn't to be. Cureton's introduction coincided with Igoe bursting
into life across the pitch, winning balls and playing some good passes
forward to generate a bit of interest. Harper had a decent second half
too and almost won the game for Reading after a great move saw him released
into the area on the left. The keeper was straight out of his goal however
and Harper's shot was straight at the keeper. Andy Hughes should have
knocked the ball back into the middle but chose to head the ball wide
of the target. Jamie Cureton continued to give Reading options up front
by doing his usual job of being in the right place at the right time.
A Murty cross from the right saw Cureton hit a close range shot at the
keeper and then put the rebound over the top from close range. It was
too little too late. Reading finished well on top but they'd spent too
much of the game allowing Walsall's time wasting tactics to get the better
of them. It was up to Reading to come up with ideas today and they seemed
completely without them. From the kick-off Walsall conceded possession with a sloppy pass and that seemed to set the tone for the game. Reading were quite frankly a shambles in the first half. They lacked width in attack. Everyone seemed to want to play in the congested centre of the field, nobody seemed to want to break forward quickly, and consequently very little was created. Only Harper seemed to want to force the issue in midfield. Butler worked hard up front, but the main threat, as usual, was Forster. I can only recall two chances in the first half. Just after half an hour Butler somehow stumbled through the Walsall defence and found himself with a sight of goal. His attempted finish was feeble and when the ball rebounded to him he frustratingly failed to find anyone with his cross. Shortly afterwards Butler put Forster through who at least struck a decent shot which Walker deflected onto the post. The ball came back off the post to Butler on the edge of the box who made a real hash of a reasonable chance with keeper out of position. With the back four having little deal with, Pardew felt he didn't need Newman's defensive contribution and replaced him with Salako after the interval, which seemed a good idea at the time. The second half didn't produce much action in front of goal either. Forster was substituted after sixty-two minutes and the change clearly upset the striker who appeared to have a few sharp comments to make to Pardew as he took up his place on the bench. I must admit I thought he should have stayed on with maybe Igoe vacating the spot wide on the right. Cureton seemed eager to seize his opportunity when came on and looked very sharp. He got himself into good positions but when a good chance did arrive from a good ball across the box from Murty, he hit his shot straight at Walker, and then threw himself at the rebound and sending the ball flying high into the crowd. Harper also managed to get into the a scoring position by exchanging passes with Butler on the edge of the box, but it was only a half chance. He was at least looking like he wanted to get forward and score. Butler was eventually replaced by Tyson who played up the middle. By then we really were clutching at straws. When the board went up showing three minutes of added time Reading suddenly seemed to realise that the game was about to end in a draw and pressed forward with greater urgency. Too little, too late! It was a poor result and to hear the manager talking about how negative Walsall were does not alter the fact that we have just played a struggling side three times and failed to score a goal against them in open play. We are in the middle of a bad run - one win and five goals scored in nine games, including a very tame exit from the Cup. Defensively we still look strong, so we do have the foundations to build on. The addition of Brown is a real asset. He was very assured today and his distribution was of higher quality than any centre back we've had for a while. We are strong enough in midfield although Newman has become a bit sloppy with his passing and although the accuracy of Hughes' passing has improved, the timing of his passing leaves a lot to be desired! The problem of being a bit lightweight up front is not going to be solved within the present squad. We have a real chance of making the play offs but it is going to slip away because we are simply not scoring enough goals. An obvious point but nobody seems to want to do anything about it. |
FANS' POST MATCH OPINION
|
|
ken c
|
If you don't score goals, you don't win games. In the
three games against Walsall, we have looked the better team, but we have
failed to win the matches. That has been down to our inability to hit the
back of the net. Whilst the strikers must take the bulk of the responsibility,
it is not as if we get many goals from elsewhere, the back four don't score
and only Hughes scores from midfield. The starting line up was a bit of
a surprise with neither Tyson nor Solako operating down the left. That slot
was left to Hughes whose performance was like so many of his team mates.
Lots of effort, good running but a bit like a rabbit in front of a car's
headlights when he got near to the penalty box. Right at the end he did
a great run beat a couple of players and put the ball into the box and you
were left wondering why he hadn't done that before. The first half was largely forgettable. The back four were solid, Murty (my man of the match) and Shorey trying to get high up the field. We could not hold onto the ball well enough. The best chance fell to Forster who was put in with a delightful ball by Butler. Forster hit the post and Butler's attempt with the rebound was somewhat embarrassing. Butler had a typical Butler day. I don't think he won a header, his control was poor, he did not look like scoring. He worked hard and played Forster in twice, but he really has not shown that he can do it at this level. In the time that Tyson was on he won more in the air! Fortser was not as sharp as he has been and when Cureton came on, he looked sharper but was guilty of the worst misses of the game. We are still striving to get the right combination and it is understandable why Pardew is after a midfield player who can score. Our main attacking asset is pace. That is a quality that we have in abundance, but if the opposition sit deep we are not good at playing in front of them. We lack a physical presence to upset the opposition unless Henderson can shrug off his injuries, and also lack a crafty player. This is really why we are better playing away from home with just one up front, but that puts a lot of pressure on Forster and doesn't really work at home. I think the break should do the squad good. It will give them time to regroup and work on some basics and lets hope that they come out fighting, but with a bit more subtlety against Leicester (not the most subtle team themselves!) |
nick newbury
|
Well that was a great week in the life of a Reading
FC fan! If, if, if... if we had won at Sheff Weds, and if we'd still be
in the FA Cup and if we'd have one yesterday, we'd all be well chuffed and
looking forward to the rest of the season with relish and excitement. Well
we're blinking not, although all three games we should have won with ease,
the season that only a month ago promised so much and stimulated one into
having mad fantasies (not involving her with the big wotsits) about the
promised land have well and truly disappeared as fast as the ink dried on
Pardew's new contract. God help us if we have another three and a half years
of this crap. What a load of bollocks this was, how on earth have we gone from a team the whole league feared playing, to this pile of boring, uninventive, lack lustre, gutless, amateur shite? Tell you what we'll do thinks Pards, Hughes who couldn't hit a cows arse with a banjo, and who had a mare on Tuesday, we'll play him, and we'll drop Tyson, who though raw, can take players on, and we'll leave Butler on as he's at the top of his game and while at it, we'll leave the best goal scorer on the bench to catch a cold, oh and while we're 0-0 down we'll take off our best player Forster just to spice things up! This really was a game to be banished into history as one of the most boring games ever. Highlight for our gang was who was gonna win "guess the crowd" and win a tenner in our sweepstake! Just imagine having to wait for the crowd announcement being the highlight of your afternoon, at least big Paddy was happy as he won! It's know it's not going to happen, but I would finally like to put on record, that we should have broken the bank to sign Upson. Never has one man had such an effect on a team's standing. We've not looked a shadow since he's gone, but gone he has. Still, nice break till the Crisp Men return , plenty of time for our hero's to practise passing to a hooped shirt, having shots at a thing called a goal, taking corners that give us a chance of scoring, passing a ball to a midfield player from defence and finally playing the game of football to a standard that we expect for so called professionals. Oi Pards! Sign on Kingsley, while the transfer window is still open!! |
paul
thatcham royal |
What total shite. After Tuesday's inept performance,
surely big changes should have happened. But no. Pardew decided to play
the same team (bar Tyson), the same formation. A few complete clangers typified
the tactics. Butler - what the hell is he doing on the pitch? He is totally out of his depth in this league. His first touch, his heading ability, his passing. All shit. Hughes - in the first half he was supposed to replace tyson. Why? We all know he can't cross the ball, he doesn't have a left foot and he persistently left Shorey all alone on the entire left side of the pitch. Any decent side would have taken us to the cleaners with that much space. Harper - always looks best the further up the pitch. He was left so deep I couldn't tell if he was a centre back, sweeper, left back etc. Why? And last of all, why is Cureton on the bench watching Butler flounder? And then Pardew replaces Forster with Cureton. Why won't he play Cureton & Forster? If they don't like each other, TOUGH! It's his job to pick the best team, irrespective of personalities. I just can't understand where the drive and the committment have gone. The first half was dreadful. Every time we got the ball the players just stopped. No movement at all. We could only pass sideways or backwards. The last 10 minutes of the game were most lively (can't bring myself to say enjoyable) I count myself as a Pardew fan, but when he gets things wrong the mistakes are spectacular and very hard to live with. Our next game is the Leicester replay. I was confident before the original game. Now I'm dreading it. We have to play our strongest team to stand any chance. |
marc s
|
I dont think we did that bad but I think we could do
better the amount of chances we had we should of put at least one away and
I think that we should of got all 3 points. Our defence looked very good
with Mackie and Brown playing very well together, our midfield lacked but
hopfully when we sign Sidwell that should sort out some things. Urzzz! |
michael
brummie royal |
By the end of the 90 minutes everyone i the ground must
have been fed up with playing Walsall - including the players! In a game
Reading never looked likely to lose we didn't have the flair or invention
to break down a very average Walsall team. Don't get me wrong - I do feel
that our current squad should be good enough to maintain an upper-middle
position in this division but a total lack of confidence coupled with the
weight of expectation that this should be 3 points in the bag seems to have
been too much for the team. On today's evidence Butler needs a rest - or a change of scene - and Tyson should be given a go. I was surprised at how much Tyson won in the air in the last few minutes - should we try him up fron alongside Cureton/Forster? the defence looks relatively good - we've certainly got the best full-back pair in the league. Also I think Watson needs to be playing alongside Harper in the middle - Harpers work rate was excellent today but he needs to be further forward. Hopefully the break before our next match will give the players some time to have a rest and get focused. Surely the hard work of ensuring we'll play Div 1 football next season is over and therefore we need to build and experiment to push ourselves forward from here. |
lobby
thatcham |
zzzzzzzzzzzzz..... Sums it up really. The highlight of the afternoon was awaiting the attendance figure because we had all had a friendly wager. And the tight git Paddy didn't even buy a round with his winnings. |
emmer green royal
|
Tuesday 14 January 2003 must have been Groundhog day.
There’s no other explanation for it. Surely Reading couldn’t have played
such dull ineffective and completely crap football twice in one week? There
isn’t a lot I can say about the game other than I managed to stay awake…..just!
Instead I have a few comments to make instead. After the tuesday game someone said we should spend £3m on a new striker. Well there are two problem with that, firstly where will this £3m come from and secondly if there are never any decent crosses or through balls what is this wonderful striker going to feed off? Forster has been having some success recently because he takes players on himself so doesn’t have to rely on the non-existent service but this doesn’t always work. We desperately need some spark from someone to create decent opening for whoever plays up front. Although he was a lazy git it’s games like these that show how much creativity Caskey brought to the side. We desperately need someone of that type to help us. Can anyone tell me what happened when Forster was substituted? For some reason there was some booing. Why? Were people booing Cureton for coming on? That would be stupid as he’d done nothing wrong. Or were they booing the fact that Forster was subbed? That again would be stupid as it was a good decision. Forster has looked dangerous this season but in both this weeks games and particularly Saturday he looked ineffective. Walsall had him sussed and he looked unlikely to score. When Cureton came on there is no doubt we looked more dangerous. Unfortunately he isn’t at his best at the moment, which is no surprise seeing as he’s rarely on the pitch. Out off the 3 main strikers we have Butler is by far the weakest link at the moment. Pardew MUST try Cureton and Forster together. Hughes is having a major dip in form at the moment. I think he should be dropped from the squad for a few games to try and sort his head out and get his form back. At the moment he is a waste of space. Having said that this game as his best recently. Harper needs a big kick up the bum from someone. He obviously has a lot of talent but seems to have absolutely no confidence. He came to the club as a supposed dead ball specialist and yet never takes them. (was the last one the disallowed ‘goal’ at QPR?) Whenever he does shoot he looks like he’s got a great shot on him and can certainly produce the spark we need sometimes but unless he can be made to produce that bit extra he is not what we are after. I have to make a comment about a couple of c**** who were sat near me. In the first half Butler put a great through ball in to Forster who hit the post and then Butler skied it. These two ‘fans’ just called Butler a wanker and the like. Very helpful. Ok so he’s not looking particular wonderful at the moment but he did look better this game and definitely put in a lot of work and a few good balls. If the team play crap then make that clear at the end but don’t single out players for abuse. I do hope the next 3 ½ years of Pardews contract aren’t as bad. If they are he will be out of a job way before then and Reading will be in full reverse. |
caversham royal
|
I was wrong, we were stuck in a time-loop of playing poorly against Walsall. Both teams took up where they left off Tues eve in that neither looked like they could score if they'd played all day and night. The midfield is still the problem as far as I see it. It lacks someone with the creativity to create chances consistently during a game. Harper shows flashes of real skill and always looks busy and keen, but seems to lack either the confidence or real ability to unlock defences; Watson (who would have appear to have vanished completely in recent weeks) can pass well and looks the most composed and consistent of the midfielders, but again lacks the flair to provide the killer ball; Hughes has pace and his work-rate (as it was Sat) is to be praised, but his distribution can be woeful at times; and Newman (when on-song) can be a fair ball-winner, but is never going to create much if anything. Also, our lack of threat from a dead-ball situation, whether free kick or corner, is now embarrassing. When Harper first came here I remember him touted as a free-kick specialist, and yet I cannot remember him taking one save for his disallowed goal vs. QPR last season. Instead he leaves it to such 'specialists' as Murty, Newman, and now even Brown! I was surprised at the boos when Forster was taken off, as apart from hitting the post, he seemed to provide little threat on Sat. I'm also almost certain I saw the linesman flag for offside for the chance Cureton fluffed from close range near the end. Or was it my sleep-filled eyes deceiving me...? If Sidwell comes, will he be the answer? Not if he's in the same mould as what we already have. Not since Caskey (all be it on his 'good' days) have Reading had someone in the centre with flair and the creativity to unlock defences. Putting this right to improve the service to the strikers would be my priority, but hey, I know little.... A week off to improve. Thank God. COME ON...... |
royal royce
|
Junior looked very good yesterday. He controlled the ball well, could turn, and he often made something of nothing. He would make a good target man for Reading and would be a strong combination with either Forster or Cureton. Butler’s work rate doesn’t justify a place in the starting 11, and Reading will won’t the top 6 without a change to its attacking options. |
Got an opinion? E-Mail us at opinion@royals.org
Appropriate submissions will appear on match report pages |
Copyright Hob Nob Anyone? © 1994-2003
The Original
Reading Football Club Internet Site